Employees State Insurance ... vs Dwarka Nath Bhargwa
Judges: S B Majmudar, S Saghir Ahmad
21 August, 1997·Present:Hon`ble Mr. Justice S.B. Majmudar Hon`ble Mr. Justice S. Saghir Ahmad Arvind Kr. Sharma, Ms. Anubha Jain, Advs. for S.N. Terdol, Advs for the appellant J U D G M E N T The following Judgment of the Court was delivered: MAJMUDAR, J.The Employees State Insurance Corporation has brought in chal...
Supreme Court Of India
Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. vs K.V. Baby And Anr.
Judges: S V Manohar, D Wadhwa
21 August, 1997·1. These appeals are filed by the Union of India and Southern Railway against the decision of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Ernakulam Bench, dated 28-10-1993 under which the Tribunal has held that the respondents are entitled to regularisation in accordance with law and has held that they sho...
Supreme Court Of India
Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur ... vs Veer Singh Rajput And Ors.
Judges: S V Manohar, D Wadhwa
21 August, 1997·1. Respondents 1 to 28 are daily-rated muster-roil casual labour employed by ihe appellant-Municipal Corporation. Their services were terminated w.e.f. 26-8-1993, Therefore, they filed a writ petition before the High Court praying that they be considered for regularisation. By the impugned judgment,...
Supreme Court Of India
Jagdish Negi, ... vs State Of U.P. And Anr
Judges: S B Majmudar, D P Wadhwa
21 August, 1997·J U D G M E N T S.B. MAJMUDAR, J By an earlier order of this Court dated 5th May, 1997 this writ petition was ordered to be placed for final disposal. That is how it has reached final hearing before us. This petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India is moved by way of public interest li...
Supreme Court Of India
M/S L.M.L. Limited vs Collector Of Central ...
Judges: J S Verma, B N Kirpal
21 August, 1997·J U D G M E N T Kirpal, J.The appellant is engaged in the manufacture and sale of two-wheeler vehicles and it has been granted central excise licence by the respondent for the manufacture of the scooters together with the parts and accessories.For the purpose of manufacturing of scooters and parts a...
Supreme Court Of India
L.M.L. Limited vs Collector Of Central Excise, ...
Judges: J Verma, B Kirpal
21 August, 1997·JUDGMENT B.N. Kirpal, J.1. The appellant is engaged in the manufacture and sale of two-wheeler vehicles and it has been granted central excise licence by the respondent for the manufacture of the scooters together with the parts and accessories.2. For the purpose of manufacturing of scooters and par...
Supreme Court Of India
The State Of Maharashtra vs M/S Embee Corporation, Bombay
Judges: S P Bharucha, V N Khare
21 August, 1997·(with S.L.P. (C) No. 6771/94) J U D G M E N T V.N. Khare, J.The short question that arises for consideration in this appeal is whether the expression "sale or purchase occasions such import" occurring in sub-section (2) of Section 5 of the Central Sales Tax Act (in short the Act) requires that a com...
Supreme Court Of India
Bholaprasad vs State Of Maharashtra
Judges: M Mukharji, K Thomas
21 August, 1997·1. The appellant and seven others were placed on trial before an Additional Sessions Judge of Chandrapur on the allegations that on 2-1 -1990 at or about 8.00 a.m. they committed rioting on Chandrapur Tadoba Road and, in course thereof, the murder of Alakh Niranjan. On conclusion of the trial the le...
Supreme Court Of India
Shabad Pulla Reddy & Ors vs State Of Andhra Pradesh
Judges: M K Mukherjee, S Saghir Ahmad Act Headnote
20 August, 1997·PETITIONER:SHABAD PULLA REDDY & ORS.Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH DATE OF JUDGMENT: 20/08/1997 BENCH:M.K. MUKHERJEE, S. SAGHIR AHMAD ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:Present:THE 20TH DAY OF AUGUST,1997 Hon’ble Mr.Justive M.K.Mukherjee Hon’ble Mr.Justive S.Saghir Ahmad D. Prakash Reddy and G. Naras...
Supreme Court Of India
Shriji Vidyalaya And Anr. vs Patel Anil Kumar Lallubhai And ...
Judges: K Venkataswami, V Khare
20 August, 1997·1. This appeal is filed against the order of the Tribunal constituted under the Gujarat Secondary Education Act, 1972. The appellants after initiating disciplinary proceedings and after holding a regular inquiry found that the charges framed against the first respondent were proved and consequently ...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.