Reliance Industries Ltd vs Pravinbhai Jasbhai Patel & Ors
Judges: S B Majmudar, S Saghir Ahmad Act Headnote
29 August, 1997·http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 1 PETITIONER:RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LTD.Vs. RESPONDENT:PRAVINBHAI JASBHAI PATEL & ORS. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 29/08/1997 BENCH:S. B. MAJMUDAR, S. SAGHIR AHMAD ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:O R D E R This Special Leave Petition challenges the ju...
Supreme Court Of India
Reliance Industries Ltd vs Pravinbhai Jasbhai Patel & Ors
Judges: S B Majmudar, S Saghir Ahmad Act Headnote
29 August, 1997·PETITIONER:RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LTD.Vs. RESPONDENT:PRAVINBHAI JASBHAI PATEL & ORS. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 29/08/1997 BENCH:S. B. MAJMUDAR, S. SAGHIR AHMAD ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:S.B. Majmudar, J.J U D G M E N T Leave granted in Special Leave Petitions challenging the judgment and order dated 24th and 25t...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Tripura And Ors. vs Namita Majumdar [Barman] (Smt)
Judges: S Agrawal, G Nanavati
29 August, 1997·1. Delay condoned.2. Special leave granted.3. We have heard learned counsel for the parties.4. The question that falls for consideration in this appeal is whether a person born in a forward caste family can be treated as belonging to a Scheduled Caste by virtue of his/her marriage to a person who be...
Supreme Court Of India
Nagappa Mahadev Doddaamani vs New India Assurance Co. Ltd. And ...
Judges: J Verma, B Kirpal
29 August, 1997·1. Leave granted.2. The Tribunal awarded a sum of Rs. one lakh for an injury which resulted in shortening of one leg of the victim by approximately two inches. The question of adequacy of the amount of Rs. one lakh as compensation does not arise for consideration since the claimant did not demand a ...
Supreme Court Of India
Gram Panchayat Village Kot-Mana vs Additional Director, ...
Judges: S Majmudar, S S Ahmad
29 August, 1997·1. Leave granted.2. We have heard learned counsel for the appellant as well as for the contesting respondents.3. The short question raised by the appellant-Gram Panchayat before us is whether the contesting respondents could have invoked the provisions of Section 42 of the Punjab Consolidation of Ho...
Supreme Court Of India
Chhotu And Others vs State Of Maharashtra
Judges: M Mukharji, K Thomas
29 August, 1997·ORDER M.K. Mukherjee J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated June 14, 1993 passed by the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, in Criminal Appeal No. 300 of 1992 whereby it reversed the order of the Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur acquitting the four appellants (hereinafter re...
Supreme Court Of India
Ramesh vs Laxmi Bai (Smt)
Judges: A Anand, V Khare
29 August, 1997·1. Leave granted.2. The appellant divorced the respondent, Smt. Laxmi Bai through a decree of divorce dated 16-12-1993. Amit, son of the parties bom on 26-2- 987 was at that time living with the appellant. On 16-2-1995, the respondent sought search warrants under Section 97 of the CrPC for recovery ...
Supreme Court Of India
Ram Harakh (Dead) By Lrs. vs Hamid Ahmed Khan (Dead) By Lrs. And ...
Judges: S Majmudar, B Kirpal
28 August, 1997·1. These three appeals arise out of a common judgment of the High Court of Allahabad whereby the learned Single Judge of the High Court disposed of two writ petitions and confirmed the order passed in revision by the Deputy Director of Consolidation functioning under the U.P. Consolidation of Holdin...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Orissa vs M/S Orissa Road Transport Co Ltd , Chief Accounts Officer ,
Judges: S C Sen, B N Kirpal, K T Thomas Act Headnote
28 August, 1997·PETITIONER:STATE OF ORISSA Vs. RESPONDENT:M/S. ORISSA ROAD TRANSPORT CO. LTD., CHIEF ACCOUNTS OFFICER, DATE OF JUDGMENT: 28/08/1997 BENCH:S. C. SEN, B. N. KIRPAL, K. T. THOMAS ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:Present:THE 28TH DAY OF AUGUST, 1997 Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.C. Sen Hon’ble Mr. Justice B.N. Kirpal Ho...
Supreme Court Of India
Collector Of Central Excise, ... vs Usha Martin Industries
Judges: Suhas C Sen, B N Kirpal, K T Thomas
28 August, 1997·WITH [Civil Appeal Nos. 2080-2081 of 1996, 10440-10441 of 1995) J U D G M E N T THOMAS, J.The common question involved in all these appeals is whether the benefit of excise duty exemption (granted by the Central Government as per certain notifications) can be claimed in respect of commodities made o...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.