State Of Karnataka vs Diwakara Bhat
Judges: Faizan Uddin J
23 September, 1996·J U D G M E N T Faizan Uddin, J.1. This appeal by the State has been directed against the reversing judgment of the High Court of Karnataka in Criminal Appeal No. 660 of 1986 setting aside the conviction of the respondent recorded by the Session Judge, Kannada, Bangalore in Sessions Case No. 65 of 1...
Supreme Court Of India
Lend Acquisition Officer vs R.K. Hanmantenawar Or Anr
Judges: K Ramaswamy, G B Pattanaik
23 September, 1996·O R D E R Leave granted.We have heard learned counsel on both sides. Notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act 1894 (for short, the 'Act') was published on April 14, 1977 acquiring an extent of 3 acres 34 gunthas, 1 acre 2 gunthas for extension of Agricultural Produce Marketing Com...
Supreme Court Of India
Gridhari Paramanand Vadhava Etc vs State Of Maharashtra
Judges: G N Ray, G B Pattanaik
23 September, 1996·JUDGMENT 1996 Supp(6) SCR 631 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by G.N. RAY, J. These appeals have been filed under Section 19 of the Terrorists and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (hereinafter referred to as TADA) against convictions and sentences passed by the learned Judge. Designate...
Supreme Court Of India
The Agricultural Produce Marketcommittee By Its Secretary Et vs The Land Acquisition Officerand Asstt Commissioner & Anr , E
Judges: K Ramaswamy, G B Pattanaik Act Headnote
23 September, 1996·PETITIONER:THE AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE MARKETCOMMITTEE BY ITS SECRETARY ET Vs. RESPONDENT:THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICERAND ASSTT. COMMISSIONER & ANR, E DATE OF JUDGMENT: 23/09/1996 BENCH:K. RAMASWAMY, G.B. PATTANAIK ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:Present Hon’ble Mr.Justice K,Ramaswamy Hon’ble Mr.Justice G.B.Pa...
Supreme Court Of India
Gupta Steel Industries vs M/S Jolly Steel Industriespvt Ltd & Anr
Judges: K Ramaswamy, G B Pattanaik Act Headnote
23 September, 1996·PETITIONER:GUPTA STEEL INDUSTRIES Vs. RESPONDENT:M/S. JOLLY STEEL INDUSTRIESPVT. LTD. & ANR. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 23/09/1996 BENCH:K. RAMASWAMY, G.B. PATTANAIK ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:C. A. Nos . 13001-13005/-96 @ With/S.L.P.(C)No.18933-18937/96 O R D E R Leave granted We have heard learned counsel on ...
Supreme Court Of India
Madhavkrishna & Anr vs Chandra Bhaga & Ors
Judges: K Ramaswamy, G B Fattanaik Act Headnote
23 September, 1996·http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 1 PETITIONER:DR. (SMT.) SHIPRA Vs. RESPONDENT:SHRI SHANTI LAL KHOIWAL DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/04/1996 BENCH:RAMASWAMY, K. BENCH:RAMASWAMY, K. BHARUCHA S.P. (J) PARIPOORNAN, K.S.(J) CITATION:1996 AIR 1691 1996 SCC (5) 181 JT 199...
Supreme Court Of India
Harjinder Singh Sodhi vs State Of Punjab & Ors
Judges: K Ramaswamy, G B Pattanaik Act Headnote
23 September, 1996·PETITIONER:HARJINDER SINGH SODHI Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 23/09/1996 BENCH:K. RAMASWAMY, G.B. PATTANAIK ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:O R D E R This special leave petition is filed against the order of the Division Bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court made on January 29...
Supreme Court Of India
Madhavkrishna & Anr vs Chandra Bhaga & Ors
Judges: K Ramaswamy, G B Fattanaik Act Headnote
23 September, 1996·PETITIONER: MADHAVKRISHNA & ANR.Vs. RESPONDENT:CHANDRA BHAGA & ORS.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 23/09/1996 BENCH:K. RAMASWAMY, G.B. FATTANAIK ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:Leave granted.O R D E R This appeal by special leave arises from the judgment and order dated July 3, 1995 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pra...
Supreme Court Of India
U.P. State Road Transport ... vs Gobardhan and Anr
Judges: K Ramaswamy, G B Pattanaik
20 September, 1996·O R D E R Leave granted.We have heard learned counsel on both sides. This appeal by special leave arises from the judgment of the Allahabad High Court made on August 31, 1995 in Writ Petition 6727/93. For the recruitment in the year 1980, the Regional Manager of the appellant-corporation had prepare...
Supreme Court Of India
Inarco Limited vs Collector Of Central Excise
Judges: Bharucha S P J
20 September, 1996·J U D G M E N T BHARUCHA.J This appeal against the judgment and order of the Customs, Excise & Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, concerns the classification of "aprons" and "cots'.Aprons and cots are manufactured by the appellants. They are components of textile machinery. Synthetic rubber is the r...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.