Paramjit and Anr vs State Of Haryana
Judges: A S Anand, K T Thomas
26 September, 1996·J U D G M E N T DR. ANAND. J.This appeal under Section 16 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1985 (hereinafter 'TADA') is directed against the judgment and order of the Judge, Designated Court, Rohtak dated 18.4.1987/20.4.1987 vide which appellant No. 1 Paramjit was convict...
Supreme Court Of India
The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Gujarat , Ahmedabad vs Sakarlal Balabhai & Co Ltd Others
Judges: Paripoornan, K S J Paripoornan, K S J Jeevan Reddy, B P J Act Headnote
26 September, 1996·PETITIONER:THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,GUJARAT, AHMEDABAD Vs. RESPONDENT:SAKARLAL BALABHAI & CO. LTD. OTHERS DATE OF JUDGMENT: 26/09/1996 BENCH:PARIPOORNAN, K.S.(J) BENCH:PARIPOORNAN, K.S.(J) JEEVAN REDDY, B.P. (J) ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:WITH CIVIL APPEALS NOS. 3358, 4635, 4238, 4636 OF 1992 AND...
Supreme Court Of India
M/S Escorts Farms ( Ramgarh ) Limited vs The Commissioner Of Income Tax , New Delhi
Judges: Paripoornan, K S J Paripoornan, K S J Jeevan Reddy, B P J Act Headnote
26 September, 1996·PETITIONER:M/S V.B.C. EXPORTS PVT. LTD & ANR.Vs. RESPONDENT:COMMANDER S.D. BAIJAL & ORS.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 01/08/1996 BENCH:MUKHERJEE M.K. (J) BENCH:MUKHERJEE M.K. (J) KURDUKAR S.P. (J) CITATION:JT 1996 (7) 528 1996 SCALE (5)520 ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:With Crl. A. No. 567-68/87, 569-570/87, 571-...
Supreme Court Of India
M/S Escorts Farms ( Ramgarh ) Limited vs The Commissioner Of Income Tax , New Delhi
Judges: Paripoornan, K S J Paripoornan, K S J Jeevan Reddy, B P J Act Headnote
26 September, 1996·1. The appellant, a private limited company, is an Assessee to income tax. It derives income from investment, agriculture and brick kiln business. It is an investor in shares. In the assessment years 1967-68 and 1968-69, the relevant previous years ending on 30th June 1966 and 30th June 1967, the a...
Supreme Court Of India
Bandlamuddi Atchuta Ramaiah & Others vs State Of Andhra Pradesh
Judges: Thomas K T J Thomas K T J Anand, A S J Act Headnote
26 September, 1996·PETITIONER:BANDLAMUDDI ATCHUTA RAMAIAH & OTHERS Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH DATE OF JUDGMENT: 26/09/1996 BENCH:THOMAS K.T. (J) BENCH:THOMAS K.T. (J) ANAND, A.S. (J) ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:THOMAS, J.J U D G M E N T How the barks of a dog could have snowballed into the murder of a young st...
Supreme Court Of India
Collector Of Customs, Bombay vs Automatic Electric Ltd., Bombay
Judges: A Ahmadi, S V Manohar
26 September, 1996·1. The short question raised in this appeal sought by the Revenue is whether insulators/bushings of 220 KV imported by the respondents fall within Item 85.18/27(1) or 85.18/27(7), the former being a residuary item --not elsewhere specified -- whereas the latter being an item covering insulators desi...
Supreme Court Of India
Balbir Singh vs State
Judges: A S Anand, K T Thomas Act Headnote
26 September, 1996·PETITIONER:BALBIR SINGH .Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 26/09/1996 BENCH:A.S. ANAND, K.T. THOMAS ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:O R D E R This appeal under section 19 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (hereinater called the ’TADA’) is directed against the judgment an...
Supreme Court Of India
Balbir Singh vs State
Judges: A S Anand, K T Thomas Act Headnote
26 September, 1996·PETITIONER:T. VENKATA NARAYANA & ORS.Vs. RESPONDENT:SMT.VENKATA SUBBAMMA (DEAD) & ORS DATE OF JUDGMENT: 29/03/1996<table cellspacing="0" style="border-collapse:collapse;margin-left:5.5pt"><tbody><tr style="height:61pt"><td style="width:90pt"><p class="s1" style="padding-left: 2pt;text-indent: 0pt;...
Supreme Court Of India
Collector Of Customs, Madras vs Lotus Inks
Judges: A Ahmadi, S V Manohar
26 September, 1996·ORDER Sujata V. Manohar, J.1. This appeal by the Revenue is directed against the order of the Customs, Excise and Gold Control Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi, dated 10th May, 1983. The respondents who are manufacturers of Ink used Alkali Blue Flushing in the preparation of printing ink and the questi...
Supreme Court Of India
Thiagaraja Engineering ... vs Assistant Collector Of Central ...
Judges: S Bharucha, K Paripoornan
26 September, 1996·ORDER S.P. Bharucha and K.S. Paripoornan, JJ.1. These appeals arise upon decisions of the Customs, Excise & Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal upon substantially similar facts.2. The Excise duty exemption notification in question provided that the exemption would not apply to bolts, nuts and screws m...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.