State Of J & K vs Romesh Chander & Ors
Judges: K Ramasawamy, G T Nanavati Act Headnote
27 November, 1996·PETITIONER:STATE OF J. & K.Vs. RESPONDENT:ROMESH CHANDER & ORS.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 27/11/1996 BENCH:K. RAMASAWAMY, G.T. NANAVATI ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:Delay condoned. Leave granted.O R D E R We have heard learned counsel on both sides.This appeal by special leave arises from the order of the High Co...
Supreme Court Of India
Phoolan Devi vs State Of M P & Ors
Judges: J S Verma, Sujata V Manohar Act Headnote
27 November, 1996·PETITIONER:ZILA DASTAVEJ LEKHAK ASSOCIATIONBANDA & ANR.Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF U.P. & ORS.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 02/04/1996 BENCH:RAMASWAMY, K. BENCH:RAMASWAMY, K.G.B. PATTANAIK (J) CITATION:1996 AIR 2107 JT 1996 (4) 738 1996 SCALE (4)34 ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:O R D E R The petitioner, which is an...
Supreme Court Of India
Phoolan Devi vs State Of M P & Ors
Judges: J S Verma, Sujata V Manohar Act Headnote
27 November, 1996·PETITIONER:DHANNA ETC.Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH DATE OF JUDGMENT: 25/07/1996 BENCH:THOMAS K.T. (J) BENCH:THOMAS K.T. (J) ANAND, A.S. (J) CITATION:JT 1996 (6) 652 1996 SCALE (5)467 ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:Present :THE 25TH DAY OF JULY, 1996 Hon’ble Dr. Justice A.S. Ananad Hon’ble Mr....
Supreme Court Of India
Jagtar Singh vs Pargat Singh & Ors
Judges: K Ramaswamy, G T Nanavati Act Headnote
27 November, 1996·PETITIONER:JAGTAR SINGH Vs. RESPONDENT:PARGAT SINGH & ORS DATE OF JUDGMENT: 27/11/1996 BENCH:K. RAMASWAMY, G. T. NANAVATI ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:O R D E R This special leave petition arises from the order of the High Court of Punjab & Haryana made, on July 19, 1996 in Civil Revision NO. 4233/95.Res...
Supreme Court Of India
Marshall Sons & Co [India] Ltd vs Income Tax Officer
Judges: B P Jeevan Reddy, Suhas C Sen Act Headnote
27 November, 1996·PETITIONER:MARSHALL SONS & CO. [INDIA] LTD.Vs. RESPONDENT:INCOME TAX OFFICER DATE OF JUDGMENT: 27/11/1996 BENCH:B.P.JEEVAN REDDY, SUHAS C.SEN ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T B.P. JEEVAN REDDY, J.These appeals are preferred by Marshall Sons and Company [India] Limited [hereinafter referred to...
Supreme Court Of India
Phoolan Devi vs State Of M P & Ors
Judges: J S Verma, Sujata V Manohar Act Headnote
27 November, 1996·PETITIONER:SCINDIA EMPLOYEES UNION Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/05/1996 BENCH:RAMASWAMY, K. BENCH: RAMASWAMY, K. FAIZAN UDDIN (J) G.B. PATTANAIK (J) CITATION:1996 SCALE (5)75 ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:O R D E R We have heard Ms. Indira Jaisingh, learned senior counsel...
Supreme Court Of India
Phoolan Devi vs State Of M P & Ors
Judges: J S Verma, Sujata V Manohar Act Headnote
27 November, 1996·PETITIONER:ANSARAM RAMBHAU YOLVE & ORS.Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF MAHARASTRA DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/02/1996 BENCH:MUKHERJEE M.K. (J) BENCH:MUKHERJEE M.K. (J) KIRPAL B.N. (J) CITATION:JT 1996 (3) 24 1996 SCALE (2)236 ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:M.K. MUKHERJEE, J.J U D G M E N T Eleven persons, including t...
Supreme Court Of India
Phoolan Devi vs State Of M P & Ors
Judges: J S Verma, Sujata V Manohar Act Headnote
27 November, 1996·PETITIONER:THE SECRETARY,HAILAKANDI BAR ASSOCIATION Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF ASSAM AND ANOTHER DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/05/1996 BENCH:SEN, S.C. (J) BENCH:SEN, S.C. (J) AHMADI A.M. (CJ) CITATION:1996 AIR 1925 JT 1996 (5) 88 1996 SCALE (4)290 ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT: SEN, J.J U D G M E N T This case ...
Supreme Court Of India
Phoolan Devi vs State Of M P & Ors
Judges: J S Verma, Sujata V Manohar Act Headnote
27 November, 1996·PETITIONER:PHOOLAN DEVI Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF M.P. & ORS .DATE OF JUDGMENT: 27/11/1996 BENCH:J.S. VERMA, SUJATA V. MANOHAR ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:J.S. VERMA.J.J U D G M E N T The petitioner - Smt. Phoolan Devi was in custody since February 12, 1983 when she claims to have voluntarily surrendered ...
Supreme Court Of India
M/S. Goodyear India Ltd vs The Regional Director, ...
Judges: K Ramaswamy, G T Nanavati
27 November, 1996·O R D E R This Appeal by special leave arises from the judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, made on January 30, 1985 in FAO No.21/85 and C.M. No.192-CII.The appellant-establishment was covered under the provision of the Employees' state Insurance Act. 1940 (for short, the 'Act'). On Decemb...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.