Simmonds Marshall Ltd. vs H.R. Bareliker And Ors.
Judges: M Punchhi, K Venkataswami
28 November, 1996·1. The controversy which fell for determination was whether the nut manufactured by the appellants in these connected appeals was such a nut which could fall within the compass of Entry 52 of the Schedule to the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. The appellants were successful in hammering their po...
Supreme Court Of India
Sovrin Knit Works Etc vs Employees' State Insurance ...
Judges: K Ramaswamy, G T Nanavati
28 November, 1996·WITH CIVIL APPEAL NOS.403(NL)/86, 2057-58/81/3257 & 3258/82 O R D E R These appeals by special leave arise from the orders of the E.S.I. Court, Faridabad, Harayana. The facts in CA No. 402/86 are sufficient for disposal of all the appeals. The appellants are establishments covered under the provisio...
Supreme Court Of India
Collector Of Customs, Bombay And ... vs Kirloskar Cummins Ltd. And Ors.
Judges: A Ahmadi, S V Manohar
28 November, 1996·1. The short question involved in the present appeals is whether parts such as pistons, gaskets, etc. are assessable to C.V. duty under the old Tariff Entry 34-A as is contended by the Revenue or they fall within the residuary Entry 68 as is urged by the assessees. The assessees' contention has been...
Supreme Court Of India
Commissioner Of Income Tax ... vs Maganlal Chhaganlal (P) Ltd.
Judges: B J Reddy, K Paripoornan
28 November, 1996·1. Of the six questions which were sought to be raised by the Revenue and which application under Section 256(2) of the Income Tax Act was dismissed by the High Court, this Court granted special leave in respect of only one of the six questions namely; "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances ...
Supreme Court Of India
Thacker Pragji Anandji vs Mansukh Ambalal (Dead) ...
Judges: K Ramaswamy, G T Nanavati
28 November, 1996·THE 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 1996 Present:Hon'ble Mr. Justice K. Ramaswamy Hon'ble Mr. Justice G.T. Nanavati Vimal Dave, Adv. for the appellant S.C.Patel, Adv. for the Respondents O R D E R The following Order of the Court was delivered Pragji Anandji and Damji Anandji are brothers. House Nos. 247 & 248...
Supreme Court Of India
Mithailal And Ors. vs State Of Maharashtra
Judges: G Ray, S S Ahmad
28 November, 1996·1. In this appeal the conviction of the appellants for the offence of murder by creating a situation by which Sita Bai the wife of Appellant 1 Mithailal had to meet death on account of starvation and consequential sentence passed by the learned Sessions Judge since upheld by the High Court are under...
Supreme Court Of India
Raja Ram Singh vs Phoolan Devi and Ors
Judges: J S Verma, Sujata V Manohar
27 November, 1996·O R D E R In view of the order made today disposing of writ petition no. 43 of 1993, Phoolan Devi Vs. state of M.P.& Ors. this writ petition has become infructuous.It is, accordingly, dismissed....
Supreme Court Of India
Charan Singh Etc vs State Of Punjab and Ors. Etc
Judges: K Ramaswamy, G T Nanavati
27 November, 1996·WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.15403-06 OF 1996,15408-17,&15407/96 (Arising out of SLP (C) Nos.10416-19/94, 7006-15/95 and 4886/96.AND CONTEMP PETITION (C) NO.534 OF 1996 O R D E R Substitution allowed.Leave granted. We have heard learned counsel on both sides.The facts in appeal arising out of SLP (C) No.826...
Supreme Court Of India
M/S Mohan Meakin Ltd vs Excise and Taxation ...
Judges: K Ramaswamy, G T Nanavati
27 November, 1996·O R D E R This appeal by special leave arises from the Judgment of the Division Bench of the Himachal Pradesh High Court, made on July 2, 1980 in Writ Petition No.121/79. The question is: at what stage the beer is exigible to duty under the Punjab Excise Act, 1914 (1 of 1914) (for short, the `Act')....
Supreme Court Of India
Sita Ram Bansal & Ors Etc Etc vs State Of Punjab & Ors Etc Etc
Judges: K Ramaswamy, G T Nanavati Act Headnote
27 November, 1996·PETITIONER:SITA RAM BANSAL & ORS. ETC.ETC.Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS.ETC.ETC. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 27/11/1996 BENCH:K.RAMASWAMY, G.T.NANAVATI ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:O R D E R These special leave petitions have been filed against the judgment of the division bench of the punjab & Haryana High...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.