Dr K Madan vs Smt Krishnawati & Anr
Judges: Sujata V Manohar, B N Kirpal Act Headnote
06 November, 1996·PETITIONER:KHACHAR BHIKHUBHAI UNADBHAIAND TWO OTHERS.Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF GUJARAT AND ANOTHER DATE OF JUDGMENT: 10/05/1996 BENCH:FAIZAN UDDIN (J) BENCH:FAIZAN UDDIN (J) KULDIP SINGH (J) CITATION:1996 AIR 2104 1996 SCC (4) 738 JT 1996 (6) 264 1996 SCALE (4)492 ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:Faiza...
Supreme Court Of India
Air India Statutory Corporation vs United Labour Union & Ors
Judges: K Ramaswamy, B L Hansaria, S B Majmudar Act Headnote
06 November, 1996·PETITIONER:AIR INDIA STATUTORY CORPORATION.Vs. RESPONDENT:UNITED LABOUR UNION & ORS.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/11/1996 BENCH:K. RAMASWAMY, B.L. HANSARIA, S.B. MAJMUDAR ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:Present :THE 6TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 1996.Hon’ble Mr. Justice K. Ramaswamy Hon’ble Mr. Justice B.L. Hansaria Hon’ble ...
Supreme Court Of India
S P Anand , Indore vs H D Deve Gowda & Others
Judges: Cjt, Sujata V Manohar Act Headnote
06 November, 1996·PETITIONER:SHAHEEN WELFARE ASSOCIATION Vs. RESPONDENT:UNION OF INDIA & ORS.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 27/02/1996 BENCH:MANOHAR SUJATA V. (J) BENCH:MANOHAR SUJATA V. (J) AHMADI A.M. (CJ) CITATION:1996 SCC (2) 616 JT 1996 (2) 719 1996 SCALE (2)481 ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T Mrs.Sujata V.Manoha...
Supreme Court Of India
S P Anand , Indore vs H D Deve Gowda & Others
Judges: Cjt, Sujata V Manohar Act Headnote
06 November, 1996·PETITIONER:MILLS DOUGLAS MICHAEL & ORS.Vs. RESPONDENT:UNION OF INDIA & ORS.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 02/04/1996 BENCH:G.B. PATTANAIK (J) BENCH:G.B. PATTANAIK (J) AGRAWAL, S.C. (J) CITATION:1996 AIR 1905 JT 1996 (4) 189 1996 SCALE (3)393 ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:PATTANAIK. J.Leave granted.J U D G M E N ...
Supreme Court Of India
Dr K Madan vs Smt Krishnawati & Anr
Judges: Sujata V Manohar, B N Kirpal Act Headnote
06 November, 1996·PETITIONER:DR. K MADAN Vs. RESPONDENT:SMT. KRISHNAWATI & ANR.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/11/1996 BENCH:SUJATA V. MANOHAR, B.N. KIRPAL ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:KIRPAL, J.Leave granted.J U D G M E N T This is an appeal by the appellant-tenant in which the challenge is to an order which had been passed under S...
Supreme Court Of India
M Poornachandran & Anr vs State Of Tamil Nadu & Ors
Judges: K Ramaswamy, B L Hansaria, S B Majmudar Act Headnote
06 November, 1996·http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 1 PETITIONER:M. POORNACHANDRAN & ANR.Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF TAMIL NADU & ORS.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/11/1996 BENCH:K. RAMASWAMY, B.L. HANSARIA, S.B. MAJMUDAR ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:O R D E R The record of the appeal indicates that ...
Supreme Court Of India
M/S. Reliance Silicon (I) Pvt. Ltd vs The Collector, Central Excise, ...
Judges: S P Bharucha, S B Majmudar
06 November, 1996·W I T H [Civil Appeal Nos.2162-70/88; 1942-53/88; 3657-72/90; 3284- 85/90; 1507/84; 3105/88; 5929/90; 6263/95; 1768/90] J U D G M E N T S.B Majmudar, J.This group of appeals arising from diverse orders passed by Customs, Excise & Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as 'CEGAT')...
Supreme Court Of India
Vijay Kumar Nigam (Dead) Through ... vs State Of M.P. And Others
Judges: K Ramaswamy, G Pattanaik
06 November, 1996·1. Though the legal representatives of the appellant have been brought on record, they did not appear either in person or through counsel. We have taken the assistance of Shri S.K. Agnihotri, learned Counsel for the State.2. The appellant, while working as Sub-Inspector, and being in-charge of the P...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Kerala And Ors. vs Joy Varghese, Kerala Rubber ...
Judges: S Bharucha, K Venkataswami
06 November, 1996·1. We have read the principal judgment and order under appeal (which is reported in [1986] 62 STC 227 (Ker) (Joy Varghese v. State of Kerala). The Division Bench of the Kerala High Court has set down in the judgment the various relevant statutory provisions and having analysed them has, in our view,...
Supreme Court Of India
Smt. Gulab Devi vs The Deputy Director Of ...
Judges: M M Punchhi, K S Paripoornan
06 November, 1996·O R D E R We have remained unassisted because no one has appeared for the respondents.From the judgment under appeal we gather that the High Court has proceeded on the basis of the genealogy drawn that Jageshwar Singh had 1/4th share in a joint holding. On the death of Jageshwar Singh, his widow Bha...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.