Prabhat Sound Studios vs Additional Collector Of Central ...
Judges: S Bharucha, K Venkataswami
07 November, 1996·1. The appeal directed against the order of a Full Bench of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi. Two learned Members held against the appellant-assessee and one Member held in its favour.2. It is not in dispute that the appellant, on job-work basis, recorded sound on...
Supreme Court Of India
Saroj Bhardwaj (Smt) And Anr. vs Additional Civil Judge And Ors.
Judges: M Punchhi, K Paripoornan
07 November, 1996·1. The claim made by Mr. Bagga, learned Senior Counsel for the appellants, is that a wife who had separated in property from her husband, shall be treated to be a judicially separated wife for the purposes of Section 3(7) of the U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960 (the Act). The co...
Supreme Court Of India
Ceakay Rubber Industries vs Collector Of Central Excise, ...
Judges: S Bharucha, K Venkataswami
07 November, 1996·ORDER S.P. Bharucha and K. Venkataswami, JJ1. The question in this appeal against the judgment of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal is whether the provisions of Rule 9(2) were properly attracted to the appellants' case.2. The majority view of the Tribunal was that the appella...
Supreme Court Of India
Employees' State ... vs M/S. F. Fibre Bangalore (P) Ltd
Judges: K Ramaswamy, G B Pattanaik
07 November, 1996·THE 7TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 1996 Present:Hon'ble Mr. Justice K. Ramaswamy Hon'ble Mr. Justice G. BN. Pattanaik R. Venugopal Reddy, Sr. Adv., S.A. Wasim Qadri, Mrs. Anil Katiyar, Advs, with him for the appellant M.N. Shroff, Adv. for the Respondent O R D E R The following Order of the Court was delivered...
Supreme Court Of India
Mamanchand Ramjidas vs Union Of India (Uoi)
Judges: A Ahmadi, S V Manohar
07 November, 1996·1. In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 35A of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 (hereinafter called 'the Act'), the appellant was served with a show-cause notice dated 21-3-1973 alleging that the goods in question were 'permitted by the Central Excise Officer(s) to be cleared without...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of H P & Ors vs Surinder Kumar Mohindra & Ors
Judges: K Ramaswamy, G B Pattanaik Act Headnote
07 November, 1996·PETITIONER:MAMAD HASSAM BHAGAD AND OTHERS Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF GUJARAT AND OTHERS DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/05/1996 BENCH:VENKATASWAMI K. (J) BENCH:VENKATASWAMI K. (J) ANAND, A.S. (J) CITATION:1996 AIR 2057 JT 1996 (5) 327 1996 SCALE (4)313 ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:K. VENKATASWAMI,J.J U D G M E N...
Supreme Court Of India
Sewa Kaur vs State Of Punjab
Judges: A S Anand, K T Thomas Act Headnote
07 November, 1996·PETITIONER:SEWA KAUR Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF PUNJAB DATE OF JUDGMENT: 07/11/1996 BENCH:A.S. ANAND, K.T. THOMAS ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:O R D E R This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and order of the High Court dated 20.1.1993 upholding the conviction and sentence recorded by...
Supreme Court Of India
Azad And Others vs Dharampal And Others
Judges: N Singh, S Majmudar
07 November, 1996·1. The appellants are the allottees of the lands which had been declared surplus in the year 1960 under the provisions of the Pepsu Tenancy Agricultural Lands Act, 1955. The plaintiffs-respondents (hereinafter referred to as "respondents") are the heirs of the original landholder Ganga Sahai who die...
Supreme Court Of India
Central Coalfields Ltd. vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors.
Judges: J Verma, B Kirpal
07 November, 1996·1. The only point raised for decision in these appeals is whether the prior service of a workman continuing in service after 1-5-1972 under the Coking Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1972 has to be included in the length of service for determining the amount of gratuity payable to such a workman u...
Supreme Court Of India
Gram Panchayat, Nurpur vs State Of Punjab And Ors.
Judges: K Singh, S S Ahmad
07 November, 1996·1. The question before the Additional Director, Consolidation of Holdings, Punjab, was whether the land in dispute was a "shamlat deh" land and as such owned by the Gram Panchayat or it was owned by the proprietors of the village. The Additional Director came to the conclusion that the respondents w...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.