The Committee For The Protection Of Democratic Rights vs The Chief Minister Of The State Of Maharashtra & Others
Judges: B P Jeevan Reddy, K S Paripoornan Act Headnote
20 November, 1996·PETITIONER:THE COMMITTEE FOR THE PROTECTION OF DEMOCRATIC RIGHTS Vs. RESPONDENT:THE CHIEF MINISTER OF THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS DATE OF JUDGMENT: 20/11/1996 BENCH:B.P. JEEVAN REDDY, K.S. PARIPOORNAN ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T B.P.JEEVAN REDDY.J.Leave granted.This appeal is prefe...
Supreme Court Of India
Narayan Dattatraya Ramteerthakhar vs State Of Maharashtra & Ors
Judges: K Ramaswamy, G T Nanaviti, K Venkataswami Act Headnote
20 November, 1996·PETITIONER:NARAYAN DATTATRAYA RAMTEERTHAKHAR Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 20/11/1996 BENCH:K. RAMASWAMY, G.T. NANAVITI, K. VENKATASWAMI ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:Delay condoned.O R D E R The special leave petition arises from the order of Maharashtra Administrative Tribu...
Supreme Court Of India
M/S Metagraphs Pvt Ltd vs Collector Of Central Excise , Bombay
Judges: S P Bharucha, K Venkataswami Act Headnote
20 November, 1996·PETITIONER:M/S. METAGRAPHS PVT. LTD.Vs. RESPONDENT:COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, BOMBAY DATE OF JUDGMENT: 20/11/1996 BENCH:S.P. BHARUCHA, K. VENKATASWAMI ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:Venkataswami, J.J U D G M E N T The only question that arises for our consideration in all these Appeals is whether ‘Printe...
Supreme Court Of India
Bharat Coking Coal Limited vs Madanlal Agrawal
Judges: Subhas C Sen, Sujata V Manohar Act Headnote
20 November, 1996·PETITIONER:BHARAT COKING COAL LIMITED Vs. RESPONDENT:MADANLAL AGRAWAL DATE OF JUDGMENT: 20/11/1996 BENCH:SUBHAS C. SEN, SUJATA V. MANOHAR ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:(With C.A. Nos.1727/1990, 1728/1990, 1729/1990, 1730/1990, 1731/1990 and 4673/1994) J U D G M E N T SEN, J.This appeal arises out of a sui...
Supreme Court Of India
Waldies Ltd vs Commissioner Of Income Tax, West ...
Judges: B P Jeevan Reddy, Suhas C Sen
20 November, 1996·J U D G M E N T SEN. J.The Companies (Profits) Surtax Act impose an additional Tax, apart from Income Tax, on the income of a company. It is a tax on so much of the 'chargeable profits' of a company of the previous year as exceeds the statutory deduction at the rate specified in the Act. 'Chargeable...
Supreme Court Of India
Jose Antonio Cruz Dos R. ... vs Land Acquisition Collector And ...
Judges: A M Ahmadi Cji, S B Majmudar, B N Kirpal
20 November, 1996·JUDGMENT 1996 Supp(8) SCR 910 The Judgment was delivered by AHMADI, C.J.AHMADI, C.J. -Special leave granted2. The question which arises for determination in these two appeals is whether the period of three months prescribed for making an application for redetermination of the amount of compensation ...
Supreme Court Of India
The Committee For The Protection ... vs The Chief Minister Of The State Of ...
Judges: B P Jeevan Reddy, K S Paripoornan
20 November, 1996·J U D G M E N T B.P.JEEVAN REDDY.J.Leave granted.This appeal is preferred by the Committee for the Protection of Democratic Rights against the order of the Bombay High Court summarily dismissing the writ petition. In the writ petition filed in the High Court the appellant had asked for the following...
Supreme Court Of India
Depot Manager, Andhra Pradesh ... vs Mohd. Yousuf Miya Etc
Judges: K Ramaswamy, G T Nanavati, K Venkataswami
20 November, 1996·WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.15420-22 OF 1996 (Arising out of SLP (C) Nos.16386, 16868 and 16920 of 1996) O R D E R Leave granted.We have heard learned counsel on both sides. The facts in appeal arising out of SLP (C) No.16342/96 are sufficient for disposal of the common controversy raised in these cases.Th...
Supreme Court Of India
Chinnamal vs State Of T.N. And Ors.
Judges: M Mukharji, S Kurdukar
20 November, 1996·1. The six accused-respondents were tried for and convicted of offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 307 and 302 IPC (3 counts). In appeal, the High Court set aside their convictions and acquitted them. Aggrieved thereby the appellant, who happens to be the wife of one of the three deceased a...
Supreme Court Of India
Hardev Singh Vs. Respondent: ... vs Harbhej Singh And Others
Judges: M Mukharji, S Kurdukar
20 November, 1996·1. These two Criminal Appeals on obtaining Special Leave have been filed by the appellants challenging the legality and correctness of the judgment and order of acquittal dated January 28, 1988 passed by the Punjab and Haryana High Court at Chandigarh.2. The prosecution had put in the challan before...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.