B R Veerabasavaradhya vs The Devotees Of Lingadgudi Mutt & Ors
Judges: K Ramaswamy, Faizan Uddin, G B Pattanaik Act Headnote
08 May, 1996·PETITIONER:B.R. VEERABASAVARADHYA Vs. RESPONDENT:THE DEVOTEES OF LINGADGUDI MUTT & ORS. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/05/1996 BENCH:K. RAMASWAMY, FAIZAN UDDIN, G.B. PATTANAIK ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:Leave granted.O R D E R We have heard counsel on both sides.It is not in dispute that in OS No.22/62 filed aga...
Supreme Court Of India
B R Veerabasavaradhya vs The Devotees Of Lingadgudi Mutt & Ors
Judges: K Ramaswamy, Faizan Uddin, G B Pattanaik Act Headnote
08 May, 1996·PETITIONER:S.R BHANRALE Vs. RESPONDENT:UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS DATE OF JUDGMENT: 19/07/1996 BENCH:ANAND, A.S. (J) BENCH:ANAND, A.S. (J) THOMAS K.T. (J) CITATION:1996 SCALE (5)693 ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:Leave granted O R D E R This is rather an unfortunate case. the appellant jointed his service a...
Supreme Court Of India
B R Veerabasavaradhya vs The Devotees Of Lingadgudi Mutt & Ors
Judges: K Ramaswamy, Faizan Uddin, G B Pattanaik Act Headnote
08 May, 1996·PETITIONER:STATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS.Vs. RESPONDENT:V.B. HIREGOWDAR DATE OF JUDGMENT: 19/07/1996 BENCH:ANAND, A.S. (J) BENCH:ANAND, A.S. (J) THOMAS K.T. (J) CITATION:1996 SCALE (5)673 ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:O R D E R Special leave granted.The respondent who was serving as an officer of the Governmen...
Supreme Court Of India
B R Veerabasavaradhya vs The Devotees Of Lingadgudi Mutt & Ors
Judges: K Ramaswamy, Faizan Uddin, G B Pattanaik Act Headnote
08 May, 1996·Leave granted.We have heard learned counsel on both sides.The facts are very simple. The appellant-lessee laid the Suit No. 9460/90 for perpetual injunction against the Municipal Corporation af Bombay restraining them from demolishing a portion of the building. The Municipal Corporation had issued...
Supreme Court Of India
Smt. Vijayalakshmi vs B. Himantharaja Chetty and Anr
Judges: Punchhi, M M
07 May, 1996·J U D G M E N T S Punchhi, J.This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and decree dated 1-9-1978, rendered by a Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka in Regular First Appeal No.91 of 1973, affirming that of the Trial Court.Shri Batchu Muniyappa Chetty, statedly the foster...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Maharashtra vs Purshottam and Ors
Judges: G B Pattanaik J
07 May, 1996·J U D G M E N T PATTANAIK. J.Leave granted.This appeal by special leave is directed against the Order dated 25.10.1994 of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal, Nagpur Bench in Transfer Application No. 743 of 1992.The respondents 1 to 4 herein were appointed as Junior Engineers on work charged est...
Supreme Court Of India
The State Of Madhya Pradesh vs Mohan Lal and Ors
Judges: G B Pattanaik J
07 May, 1996·J U D G M E N T PATTANAIK, J.This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and order dated 9.10.1983 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Gwalior in Criminal Appeal No. 450 of 198;3 arising out of Sessions Trial No. 96 of 1980.The respondents were charged under Sections 302/...
Supreme Court Of India
Dhannalal vs D.P. Vijayvargiya and Ors
Judges: Singh N P J
07 May, 1996·J U D G M E N T N.P. SINGH. J Leave granted.The appellant while going on read on 4.12.1990 became victim of an accident, because of the rash and negligent driving of the scooter by respondent No.1 (hereinafter referred to as the 'respondent'). The appellant suffered serious injuries and was admitted...
Supreme Court Of India
Dhannalal vs D.P. Vijayvargiya and Ors
Judges: Singh N P J
07 May, 1996·J U D G M E N T N.P. SINGH. J Leave granted.The appellant while going on read on 4.12.1990 became victim of an accident, because of the rash and negligent driving of the scooter by respondent No.1 (hereinafter referred to as the 'respondent'). The appellant suffered serious injuries and was admitted...
Supreme Court Of India
U.P.State Road ... vs Trilok Chandra and Ors
Judges: Ahmadi A M Cj
07 May, 1996·THE 7TH DAY OF MAY, 1996 Present:Hon'ble the Chief Justice Hon'ble Mr.Justice N.P. Singh Hon'ble Mr.Justice M.K.Mukherjee Raju Ramachandran and Ms.S.Ramachandran, Advs. for the appellants.R.A.Mishra, Adv. for K.K.Gupta, Adv. for the Respondent Nos. 1-4 M.H.Baig, Sr.Adv,(Mrs.P.S.Shroff) Adv. for S.A....
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.