M/S Shiv Shakti Gol Finger vs Asstt Commissioner , Commercial Taxes , Jaipur
Judges: K Ramaswamy, G B Pattanaik Act Headnote
10 May, 1996·PETITIONER:M/S. SHIV SHAKTI GOL FINGER Vs. RESPONDENT:ASSTT. COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAXES, JAIPUR DATE OF JUDGMENT: 10/05/1996 BENCH:K. RAMASWAMY, G.B. PATTANAIK ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:Present:THE 10TH DAY OF MAY, 1996 Hon’ble Mr.Justice K.Ramaswamy Hon’ble Mr.Justice G.B.Pattanaik K.K.Jain, Ajay...
Supreme Court Of India
Union Of India & Ors vs M/S Sharma Coal Co
Judges: K Ramaswamy, G B Pattanaik Act Headnote
10 May, 1996·PETITIONER:UNION OF INDIA & ORS.Vs. RESPONDENT:M/S. SHARMA COAL CO.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 10/05/1996 BENCH:K. RAMASWAMY, G.B. PATTANAIK ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:Present:THE 10TH DAY OF MAY, 1996 Hon’ble Mr.Justice K.Ramaswamy Hon’ble Mr.Justice G.B. Pattanaik C.B.Babu, B.Krishna Prasad and P.Parmeshwaran,...
Supreme Court Of India
Hasmattullah vs State Of Madhya Pradesh And Others
Judges: A A I, N Singh, B Kirpal
10 May, 1996·ORDER B.N. Kirpal, J.1. Leave granted.2. The challenge in this appeal is to the validity of the M.P. Krishik Pashu Parirakshan (Sanshodhan) Adhiniyam, 1991 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Amending Act') by virtue of which a total ban has been imposed on the slaughter of the bulls and bullocks in th...
Supreme Court Of India
M/S. Attabira Regulated ... vs M/S. Ganesh Rice Mills
Judges: Ramaswamy, K
10 May, 1996·WITH SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO.2092 OF 1992 O R D E R Leave granted.We have heard learned counsel for the appellant. Though notice was sent to the respondent on April 14, 1992 till date neither acknowledgement nor unserved envelope has been received. Under these circumstances, the notice mus...
Supreme Court Of India
Cycle Corporation Of India Ltd vs T.I. Raleigh Industriespvt. Ltd. ...
Judges: Ramaswamy, K
10 May, 1996·J U D G M E N T K. Ramaswamy, j.Leave granted.We have heard learned counsel on both sides. The admitted facts are that the respondents through their agents had registered trade mark "Raleigh" and other trade marks (12 marks) under the Indian Merchandise Marks Act, 1889 (4 of 1989) and the Trade Mark...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Manipur vs Thingujam Brojen Meeteil Ongbi Sahayamia Devi
Judges: S C Agrawal, G T Nanavati Act Headnote
10 May, 1996·PETITIONER:STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS.Vs. RESPONDENT:RAJ SINGH & ANR. ETC.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/07/1996 BENCH:RAMASWAMY, K. BENCH:RAMASWAMY, K.G.B. PATTANAIK (J) CITATION:JT 1996 (7) 194 1996 SCALE (5)688 ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:CIVIL APPEAL NO 9522 OF 1996 WITH (Arising out of SLP (C) No.3626 of 1...
Supreme Court Of India
Hashmattullah vs State Of Madhya Pradesh & Ors
Judges: N P Singh, B N Kirpal Act Headnote
10 May, 1996·http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 1 PETITIONER:M/S. ATTABIRA REGULATED MARKETCOMMITTEE Vs. RESPONDENT:M/S. GANESH RICE MILLS DATE OF JUDGMENT: 10/05/1996 BENCH:RAMASWAMY, K. BENCH:RAMASWAMY, K.G.B. PATTANAIK (J) CITATION:JT 1996 (6) 360 1996 SCALE (5)288 ACT...
Supreme Court Of India
Hashmattullah vs State Of Madhya Pradesh & Ors
Judges: N P Singh, B N Kirpal Act Headnote
10 May, 1996·PETITIONER:STATE OF A.P. & ORS.Vs. RESPONDENT:IND. NATALI GRANITE LTD.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/08/1996 BENCH:RAMASWAMY, K. BENCH:RAMASWAMY, K.G.B. PATTANAIK (J) CITATION:JT 1996 (8) 2 1996 SCALE (6)317 ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:Leave granted. Delay condoned.O R D E R Though the respondent has been se...
Supreme Court Of India
Hashmattullah vs State Of Madhya Pradesh & Ors
Judges: N P Singh, B N Kirpal Act Headnote
10 May, 1996·PETITIONER:DEVCHAND KALYAN TANDEL ETC.Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR. ETC.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/08/1996 BENCH:G.B. PATTANAIK (J) BENCH:G.B. PATTANAIK (J) RAMASWAMY, K.CITATION:JT 1996 (7) 256 1996 SCALE (5)658 ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:Present:THE 8TH DAY OF AUGUST, 1996 Hon’ble Mr.Justice K...
Supreme Court Of India
K V Krishnamani vs Lalit Kala Academy
Judges: K Ramaswamy, G B Pattanaik Act Headnote
10 May, 1996·http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 1 PETITIONER:K.V. KRISHNAMANI Vs. RESPONDENT:LALIT KALA ACADEMY DATE OF JUDGMENT: 10/05/1996 BENCH:K. RAMASWAMY, G.B. PATTANAIK ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:Leave granted.O R D E R We have heard learned counsel on both sides.This appea...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.