State Of M.P. And Anr. vs Yusuf Khan And Anr.
Judges: N Singh, S Sen
13 March, 1996·1. It appears that the premises in question belong to Yusuf Khan, Respondent 1 (hereinafter referred to as the respondent) in which a tenant had been inducted. The said respondent persuaded the tenant to vacate the premises because he had become invalid and crippled and wanted to occupy the said pre...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Karnataka vs Satish
Judges: A Anand, S Majmudar
13 March, 1996·1. Truck No. MYE-3236 being driven by the respondent turned turtle while crossing a "nalla" on 25-11-1982 at about 8.30 a.m. The accident resulted in the death of 15 persons and receipt of injuries by about 18 persons, who were travelling in the fully loaded truck. The respondent was charge-sheeted ...
Supreme Court Of India
Ajit Singh vs Niranjan Dass Rahi And Ors.
Judges: M Punchhi, S V Manohar
13 March, 1996·1. We have gone through the judgment of the High Court under appeal which is of the year 1985. Thereby the appellant stands convicted under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 and sentenced to a fine of Rs 2000 only. The appellant was a litigant in a subordinate court where his pleadings ...
Supreme Court Of India
Delhi Auto And General Finance ... vs Tax Recovery Officer, Income Tax ...
Judges: B J Reddy, S S Ahmad
13 March, 1996·ORDER Civil Appeal No. 2109 of 19781. Heard counsel for the parties. Even if it is assumed for the sake of argument that a charge was created by the award made by the arbitrator, it cannot be said to be effective in law. The charge becomes effective only when the award is made a rule of the court an...
Supreme Court Of India
Commissioner Of Income Tax, ... vs M/S.Mafatlal Gansabhai and Co. (P) ...
Judges: Jeevan Reddy, B P J
12 March, 1996·J U D G M E N T B.P.JEEVAN REDDY,J, Leave granted in the Special Leave Petition. The only question in this batch of appeals is whether the payments made in cash by an assessee to its employees are within the mischief of Section 40(a)(v) and Section 40- A(5). Sub-clause (v) was inserted in clause (a)...
Supreme Court Of India
Ram Piari and Anr. Etc vs Land Acquisition Collector, ...
Judges: Ramaswamy, K
12 March, 1996·WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5242-44, 5241 OF 1996.(Arising out of SLP (C) Nos.19947-49, 18644 and 18646 of 1995.) AND CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 6173, 6807, 6825-35 AND 8274-83 OF OF 1995 O R D E R Leave granted in SLP (C) Nos.18543-45, 19947-49, 18644 and 18646 of 1995 Notification under Section 4(i.) of the Land...
Supreme Court Of India
Jagdish Narain and Anr vs State Of U.P
Judges: Mukherjee M K J
12 March, 1996·J U D G M E N T M.K. MUKHERJEE,J.Jagdish Narain, the appellant No.1, alongwith his two sons Avdhesh and Avinash and two friends Rameshwar Dayal, the appellant No.2, and Surya Prakash was tried by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pilibhit, for rioting and murder of his step brother Jitendra Nath. The t...
Supreme Court Of India
Shri Bakshish Singh (Dead) By Lrs vs Arjan Singh and Ors
Judges: Ramaswamy, K
12 March, 1996·O R D E R This appeal by special leave arises from the order of the learned single Judge of the Punjab and Haryana High Court made in Second Appeal No. 477/68 on September 12, 1978.The admitted facts are that one Mathra Singh, Plaintiff No.1 and defendant Nos.1 to 13 were partners of the factory kno...
Supreme Court Of India
Mohan vs Smt. Anandi and Ors
Judges: Venkataswami K J
12 March, 1996·J U D G M E N T K.VENKATASWAMI J.The only question that was argued in this Appeal by learned Senior Counsel for the appellants Shri V.A. Bobde was whether the present suit out of which this Civil Appeal arises was hit by the principles of Res Judicata. We may it once point out that on this issue, th...
Supreme Court Of India
Smt. Ambey Devi vs State Of Bihar and Anr
Judges: Ramaswamy, K
12 March, 1996·O R D E R This appeal by special leave arises from the judgment of the Division Bench of the Patna High Court made in Appeal from Original Decree No. 220 and 221 of 1957 dated September 21, 1976. The only question that arises in this appeal is: whether one of the co-sharers can claim enhancement of ...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.