State Of Madhya Pradesh vs R P Sharma
Judges: Ramaswamy, K Ramaswamy, K G B Pattanaik J Act Headnote
26 July, 1996·PETITIONER:STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Vs. RESPONDENT:R.P. SHARMA DATE OF JUDGMENT: 26/07/1996 BENCH:RAMASWAMY, K. BENCH: RAMASWAMY, K.G.B. PATTANAIK (J) ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:Leave granted.O R D E R We have heard learned counsel on both sides.The respondent a Chief Engineer had entered the Governmen...
Supreme Court Of India
Pralhad Lalchand Chavan vs Iqbal Hussain Inayat Hussain ...
Judges: Agrawal, S C J
26 July, 1996·J U D G M E N T S.C. Agrawal j.Special leave granted.This appeal by the landlord arises out of a suit for eviction from premises governed by the provisions of the Central Provinces and Berar Regulation of Letting of Accommodation Act, 1946 Act, 1946 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') and the Cen...
Supreme Court Of India
Solapur Midc Industries ... vs State Of Maharashtra And Others
Judges: Punchhi, M M
26 July, 1996·O R D E R SLP No.14830/94 and SLP No.17325/94:A Notification issued under sub-section (3) of Section 3 of the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act,1949 (hereafter called the 1949 Act) dated April 23, 1992 published on April 28, 1992, was put to challenge separately by the respective two speci...
Supreme Court Of India
M/S Kashmir Electric And Hardware Corporation vs State Of Jammu And Kashmir
Judges: Punchhi, M M Punchhi, M M Venkataswami K J Act Headnote
26 July, 1996·PETITIONER:SHISH RAM & ORS.Vs. RESPONDENT:THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH& ORS. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 19/07/1996 BENCH:RAMASWAMY, K. BENCH:RAMASWAMY, K.G.B. PATTANAIK (J) CITATION:JT 1996 (7) 353 1996 SCALE (5)785 ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:Leave granted.O R D E R We have heard learned counsel on both si...
Supreme Court Of India
M/S Kashmir Electric And Hardware Corporation vs State Of Jammu And Kashmir
Judges: Punchhi, M M Punchhi, M M Venkataswami K J Act Headnote
26 July, 1996·PETITIONER:M/S. KASHMIR ELECTRIC AND HARDWARE CORPORATION Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR DATE OF JUDGMENT: 26/07/1996 BENCH:PUNCHHI, M.M. BENCH: PUNCHHI, M.M.VENKATASWAMI K. (J) ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:Present:THE 26TH DAY OF JULY, 1996 Hon’ble Mr.Justice Madan Mohan Punchhi Hon’ble Mr.Ju...
Supreme Court Of India
M/S Kashmir Electric And Hardware Corporation vs State Of Jammu And Kashmir
Judges: Punchhi, M M Punchhi, M M Venkataswami K J Act Headnote
26 July, 1996·PETITIONER:RATAN KUMAR TANDON & ORS.Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH DATE OF JUDGMENT: 01/08/1996 BENCH:RAMASWAMY, K. BENCH: RAMASWAMY, K.G.B. PATTANAIK (J) CITATION:1996 SCALE (6)176 ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:Leave granted.O R D E R We have heard learned counsel for the parties in extenso.Notifi...
Supreme Court Of India
Tushar Kanti Bose and Ors vs Savitri Devi And Ors
Judges: G B Pattanaik J
25 July, 1996·THE 25TH DAY OF JULY, 1996 Present :Hon'ble Mr.Justice K.Ramaswamy Hon'ble Mr.Justice G.B.Pattanaik Jayant Das, Sr.Adv., G.S.Chatterjee and Ms.Aruna Banerjee, Advs., with him for the appellants.P.P.Rao, Sr. Adv. S.Banerjee, Sumant Bharadwaj and Mrs. M.R.Bharadwaj, Advs. with him for the Respondents....
Supreme Court Of India
M/S Malwa Oil Mills and Anr vs State Of M.P. and Ors
Judges: K Ramaswamy, G B Pattanaik
25 July, 1996·THE 25TH DAY OF JULY, 1996 Present:Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.Ramaswamy Hon'ble Mr. Justice G.B.Pattanaik A.K.Chitale, Sr.Adv. and Sushil Kumar Jain, Adv. with him for the appellants Niraj Sharma and S.K.Agnihotri, Advs. with for the Respondent Nos.1-3 O R D E R The following Order of the Court was deliv...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Punjab and Ors vs Sadhu Ram
Judges: Ramaswamy, K
25 July, 1996·THE 25TH DAY OF JULY,1996 Present:Hon'ble Mr.Justice K.Ramaswamy Hon'ble Mr.Justice G.B.Pattanaik Manoj Swarup, Adv. for the appellants.Shashi Bhushan,(Pramod Dayal,) Adv.(NP) for the Respondent O R D E R The following Order of the Court was delivered: State of Punjab & Ors.V.Sadhu Ram O R D E R Thi...
Supreme Court Of India
Jog Ram vs State Of Haryana and Ors
Judges: Ramaswamy, K
25 July, 1996·O R D E R The appellant appears to have come into possession of 30 bighas, 13 biswas of land. Subsequently, the evacuee property vested in the Government of India was taken over by the State Government for distribution to the people according to the procedure prescribed by the Government of Punjab. ...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.