Smt Prakashwati vs Chief Controlling
Judges: Madan Mohan Punchhi, Sujata V Manohar Act Headnote
09 July, 1996·PETITIONER:SMT. PRAKASHWATI Vs. RESPONDENT:CHIEF CONTROLLING REVENUE AUTHORITY,BOARD OF REVENUE, U.P. A DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/07/1996 BENCH:MADAN MOHAN PUNCHHI, SUJATA V. MANOHAR ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:Present:THE 9TH DAY OF JULY, 1996 Hon’ble Mr.Justice M.M. Punchhi Hon’ble Mrs. Justice Sujata V. M...
Supreme Court Of India
Kashmira Singh vs Duman Singh
Judges: S C Sen Act Headnote
09 July, 1996·PETITIONER:KASHMIRA SINGH Vs. RESPONDENT:DUMAN SINGH DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/07/1996 BENCH:S.C. SEN ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:Ahmadi, CJI.J U D G M E N T Special leave granted.The present appeal seeks to challenge the judgment and order dated 19.4.1995 of the Punjab & Haryana High Court which cancelled t...
Supreme Court Of India
The State Of Rajasthan Etc vs Rajasthan Agriculture Input ...
Judges: Punchhi, M M
09 July, 1996·THE 9TH DAY OF JULY, 1996 Present:Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.M. Punchhi Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Sujata V. Manohar Aruneshwar Gupta, Adv. for the appellants G.L.Sanghi, Sr.Adv. Ravinder Narain, Adv. for M/s JBD & Co., N.K.Sagar, Adv. for B.D. Sharma, Adv. with him for the Respondents.J U D G M E N T The foll...
Supreme Court Of India
M/S Wilh Wilhelmsen vs Commissioner Of Income Tax,West ...
Judges: Jeevan Reddy, B P J
09 July, 1996·THE 9TH DAY OF JULY,1996 Present:Hon'ble Mr.Justice B.P.Jeevan Reddy Hon'ble Mr.Justice S.B.Majmudar Manoj Arora, Ms.Shipra Ghose Jain, Manoj Pillai, Rahul P.Dave and D.N.Gupta, Advs. for the appellant Dr.V.Gaurishankar, Sr.Adv. Ms.A.Subhashini, S.Rajappa,and S.N.Terdol, Advs. with him for the Respo...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Rajasthan and Ors vs Raj Singh and Anr. Etc
Judges: Ramaswamy, K
08 July, 1996·WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO 9522 OF 1996 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.3626 of 1996) O R D E R IN C.A.9522/96 ( @ SLP (C) No.3626/96) leave granted.We have heard learned counsel on both sides. This appeal by special leave arises from the order of the learned single Judge of the High Court of Rajasthan at Jaip...
Supreme Court Of India
The State Of U.P vs Dy. Director Of Consolidation and ...
Judges: Kuldip Singh J
08 July, 1996·J U D G M E N T Kuldip Singh, J The land in dispute measuring 22.11 acres was notified as reserved forest under Section 20 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (the Act) by the notification dated August 19, 1963. Respondents, in the appeals herein, claimed before the authorities under the U.P. Consolidati...
Supreme Court Of India
Director General, Est and Anr vs T. Abdul Razak Etc
Judges: Agrawal, S C J
08 July, 1996·THE 8TH DAY OF JULY, 1996 Present:Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.C Agrawal Hon'ble Mr. Justice G.T. Nanavati M. Chandrasekharan, Additional solicitor General, V.J. Francis, P.I. Jose, Adv. and Amlan Ghose, Advs. with him for the appellants.J U D G M E N T The following Judgment of the Court was delivered: Di...
Supreme Court Of India
J.A.S. Inter College and Ors vs State Of U.P. and Ors
Judges: Ramaswamy, K
08 July, 1996·O R D E R It was mentioned in the order dated April 8, 1996 that in spite of adjournment of the case repeatedly, counter affidavit has not been filed. Consequently, this Court directed the respondents to appoint 18 teachers as required by the petitioners within the specified time. It is now the admi...
Supreme Court Of India
Director General, Esi and Anr vs T. Abdul Razak Etc
Judges: Agrawal, S C J
08 July, 1996·THE 8TH DAY OF JULY, 1996 Present:Hon'ble Mr.Justice S.C.Agrawal Hon'ble Mr.Justice G.T.Nanavati M.Chandrasekharan, Additional Solicitor General, V.J.Francis, P.I.Jose, Adv and Amlan Ghose, Advs. with him for the appellants J U D G M E N T The following Judgment of the Court was delivered: Director ...
Supreme Court Of India
J.A.S. Inter College Khurja, U.P. ... vs State Of U.P. and Ors
Judges: K Ramaswamy, G B Pattanaik
08 July, 1996·O R D E R It was mentioned in the order dated April 8, 1996 that in spite of adjournment of the case repeatedly, counter affidavit has not been filed. Consequently, this Court directed the respondents to appoint 18 teachers as required by the petitioners within the specified time. It is now the admi...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.