Director Of Enforcement vs M.C.T.M. Corporation Pvt. Ltd. ...
Judges: Dr A S Anand, Faizan Uddin
19 January, 1996·JUDGMENT 1996 (1) SCR 215 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by DR. A.S. ANAND, J. Leave granted.The respondents, a private limited company and its Directors were proceeded against departmentally for having contravened the provisions of Section 10(1 )(a) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, ...
Supreme Court Of India
M/S. Murlidhar Shyamlal and Anr vs State Of Assam
Judges: Ramaswamy, K
18 January, 1996·O R D E R Leave granted.Though notice was served on the States none appeared and pursuant to another notice given to the State counsel, she has circulated a letter stating that she did not get any instructions from the State and that, therefore, she cannot proceed with the matter. We have heard the ...
Supreme Court Of India
Radhika Devi vs Bajrangi Singh and Ors
Judges: Ramaswamy, K
18 January, 1996·O R D E R We have heard learned counsel for both sides. Leave granted.The appellant has instituted Partition Suit No.24/88 in the Court of Subordinate Judge, Aurangabad for partition of certain properties. Respondents 16 to 20 herein filed written statement on June 15, 1988 wherein they pleaded that...
Supreme Court Of India
Vasavadatta Cements vs State Of Karnataka and Anr
Judges: Agrawal, S C J
18 January, 1996·WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2085 OF 1996 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 17062 of 1993] Rajashree Cement V.State of Karnataka & Anr.J U D G M E N T S.C. AGRAWAL, J. :Special leave granted in both the special leave petitions.Both these appeals are directed against the judgment of the Karnataka High Court dated ...
Supreme Court Of India
M/S.Alankar Granites Industries ... vs P.G.R.Scindia, Mla and Ors
Judges: Verma, Jagdish Saran J
18 January, 1996·(with Civil Appeal Nos.1717-18, 1719-22, 1723-28, 1729-44, 1745-66, 1767-68, 1769-72, 1773-74, 1775-77, 1778-79, 1780- 85, and 1788-89 of 1996) JUDGMENT J.S. VERMA, J.:The grant of in all 203 leases for quarrying granites in Government lands under Rule 3 of the Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rul...
Supreme Court Of India
Shri Sv Bhima Bhatta and Anr vs State Of Karnataka and Ors
Judges: Ramaswamy, K
18 January, 1996·WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2835 OF 1996 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 20571 of 1993) O R D E R SLP (C) No. 20571/93 taken on Board.We have heard the learned counsel on both sides. Leave granted.Shri S.R. Bhat, learned counsel for the appellants, contended that during the period of fluctuation of superannua...
Supreme Court Of India
Life Insurance Corporation Of ... vs Shiva Prasad Tripathi and Ors
Judges: Punchhi, M M
18 January, 1996·O R D E R Leave granted.This is an appeal against the judgment and order of a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court dated 21-2-1995 passed in Civil Writ Petition No.276 of 1995 whereunder certain directions have been made towards conferral of jurisdiction on the Small Causes Court, Bombay which, p...
Supreme Court Of India
Delhi Development Authority vs Kochhar Construction Work And ...
Judges: A Ahmadi, S V Manohar
18 January, 1996·1. Special leave granted.2. This appeal raises a short question regarding the interpretation of Sections 69(2) and (3) of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932 read with Section 20 of the Arbitration Act, 1940. The factual matrix in which this question arises may be briefly stated as under: Respondent 1,...
Supreme Court Of India
Deputy Inspector General Of ... vs G. Pandian
Judges: S Bharucha, M Mukherjee
18 January, 1996·1. Leave granted.2. The respondent is a Sub-Inspector of Police in the State of Tamil Nadu. On 28-4-1993, he was working at the Devala Police Station. It is alleged that a car (No. KLW 2105), which was case property and under police custody, was taken away by the respondent without permission. A cas...
Supreme Court Of India
R. Sulochana vs Ullgannal And Anr.
Judges: A Ahmadi, S V Manohar
18 January, 1996·1. Special leave granted.2. The short question is in regard to the quantum of compensation. The accident took place on 6-6-1979 which caused the death of a young unmarried man aged about 21 years. The mother of the deceased aged about 45 years was the sole claimant before the Tribunal.3. The claim f...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.