Commissioner Of Wealth Tax, ... vs T.S. Sundaram, Madras
Judges: J Verma, S Bharucha, S V Manohar
23 January, 1996·1. This is a reference made by the Tribunal under Section 27(3-A) of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957 to answer the following question of law namely: "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, in computing the net wealth of a firm under Rule 2 of the Wealth Tax Rules, assets exempt under S...
Supreme Court Of India
Miss Anamika Bishnoi vs Ms. Manju Chaudhry And Others
Judges: Sen, S C J
23 January, 1996·J U D G M E N T SEN.J Special leave granted.The appellant, Anamika Bishnoi, was an applicant for migration duration during the year 1993 to the Maharishi Dayanand University, Rohtak. Even though her position was No.2 in the order of merit, she was not granted admission since the mark-sheet of the Fi...
Supreme Court Of India
Ms. Monika Bhasin vs Maharishi Daya Nand ...
Judges: Ahmadi A M Cj
23 January, 1996·O R D E R Special leave granted.In view of our judgment in Nitasha Paul's case [Civil Appeal No 2310 of 1996 (Arising out of S.L.P. (C) 9776 of 1995)], this appeal is disposed of in terms of the order passed in Nitasha Paul's case, No further order is necessary in this case....
Supreme Court Of India
The State Of Punjab and Anr vs Dharam Paul and Ors
Judges: G B Pattanaik J
22 January, 1996·J U D G M E N T PATTANAIK, J.Leave granted.These appeals by the State of Punjab are directed against the judgment of the Division Bench of the Punjab High Court which dismissed the Letters Patent Appeal in limini and confirmed the order of the learned Single Judge. The question that arises for consi...
Supreme Court Of India
The Municipal Commissioner, ... vs Pijush Kanti Das and Anr
Judges: G B Pattanaik J
22 January, 1996·J U D G M E N T G.B. PATTANAIK. J.Leave granted.This appeal is directed against the Judgment of the Calcutta High Court in Letters Patent Appeal arising out of the Judgment of the single Judge in Writ Petition No. 10421(W) of 1988. The question that arises for consideration is whether the principle ...
Supreme Court Of India
Electronics Trade And Technology ... vs Indian Technologists And ...
Judges: K Ramaswamy, G B Pattanaik
22 January, 1996·JUDGMENT 1996 (1) SCR 843 The following Order of the Court was delivered :Leave granted.We have heard the counsel on both sides.The appellant laid the complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for short, 'the Act') for dishonour of cheque for insufficiency of the funds in...
Supreme Court Of India
Union Of India Ors vs Smt. Darshna Devi
Judges: Ramaswamy, K
22 January, 1996·O R D E R This Court by order dated March 2, 1995 disposed of the appeal in the light of the earlier law laid down by this Court. Review petitions in these appeals were filed and the same came to be dismissed on May 10, 1995. Now these applications have been filed after changing the counsel, for cla...
Supreme Court Of India
Manohar Lal vs State Of Rajasthan
Judges: Verma, Jagdish Saran J
22 January, 1996·O R D E R The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that there is non-compliance of Section 50 of the narcotic Drugs and psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short "the N.D.P.S. Act") which renders the conviction of the petitioner illegal. The learned counsel submitted, placing relia...
Supreme Court Of India
Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax ... vs V.K. Gururaj And Ors.
Judges: K Ramaswamy, G Pattanaik
22 January, 1996·1. Leave granted.2. We have heard the counsel for the appellant. The Government in O.M. No. F7(52) E III/78, dated May 5, 1979 have stated that special grant of pay of No. 35 per month to the Upper Division Clerks in the non-secretariat administrative offices was provided. Out of the UDCs carrying t...
Supreme Court Of India
Mulak Raj and Ors vs State Of Haryana
Judges: Majmudar S B J
19 January, 1996·J U D G M E N T S.B. Majmudar, J.This is an unfortunate case in which a young bride named Krishna Kumari lost her life on the altar of dowry demands on the morning of 12th April 1977 in the household of present appellants who were charged with the offence of murder under Section 302 read with Sectio...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.