J. Jose Dhanapaul vs S. Thomas and Ors
Judges: Ramaswamy, K
16 February, 1996·O R D E R Leave granted.We have heard learned counsel on both sides. It appears that the appointment of the first respondent was annulled by the proceedings dated December 1, 1995 in R.C. NO.727/93. Consequently, Shri Nagaraja, learned counsel for the first respondent states that his client has lost...
Supreme Court Of India
Babulal vs Raj Kumar & Ors
Judges: K Ramaswamy, G B Pattanaik Act Headnote
16 February, 1996·PETITIONER: BABULAL Vs.RESPONDENT:RAJ KUMAR & ORS.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 16/02/1996 BENCH:K. RAMASWAMY, G.B. PATTANAIK ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:Leave granted.O R D E R Though the respondents have been served, the second respondent has filed a photocopy of the Power of Attorney on behalf of respondent Nos....
Supreme Court Of India
Babulal vs Raj Kumar & Ors
Judges: K Ramaswamy, G B Pattanaik Act Headnote
16 February, 1996·PETITIONER:HIMACHAL ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION.Vs.(Arising out of S.L.P. (C) No. 16027 of 1995) Himachal Road Transport Corporation .V.Ms. Parveen Kumari J U D G M E N T PARIPOORNAN. J.Special leave granted.2. The Himachal Pradesh Road Transport Corporation is the appellant in both the appeals. One ...
Supreme Court Of India
Mangal Singh And Ors. vs Nathu Singh And Ors.
Judges: M Punchhi, M Mukherjee
16 February, 1996·1. The property in dispute belonged to one Sohan Singh, son of Ram Chand. Sohan Singh had a brother named Pir Mal who at the relevant time was no more. Pir Mal had five children, i.e., sons, namely, Mangal Singh, Piara Singh and Natha Singh and daughters, namely, Kartar Kaur and Bachan Kaur. He alle...
Supreme Court Of India
S.C. Jha vs State Of M.P. And Anr.
Judges: A Ahmadi, S Majmudar, S V Manohar
16 February, 1996·1. Special leave granted.2. Heard counsel for the appellant as well as the State and the private respondent. In the facts and circumstances of the case, we think that the Tribunal was not right in issuing the direction to refix the seniority between the appellant and the private respondent after hol...
Supreme Court Of India
Dr. Ghanshyam Jaiswal vs Kamal Singh
Judges: Ramaswamy, K
16 February, 1996·O R D E R Leave granted.Though the respondent has been served by dasti, he is not appearing either in person or through counsel. The facts are eloquent. In a suit for ejectment filed on April 5, 1984, the respondent had entered into a compromise on foot of which the decree for eviction was granted a...
Supreme Court Of India
Shri Ritesh R. Sah vs Dr. Y.L. Yamul and Ors
Judges: G B Pattanaik J
15 February, 1996·J U D G M E N T PATTANAIK,J.This Writ Petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India raises the question whether a candidate belonging to the Scheduled Caste or any other reserved category even if is entitled to be selected for selection for admission in the open competition on the basis of ...
Supreme Court Of India
Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. vs Mafatlal Fine Spinning and ...
Judges: B J Reddy, K Venkataswami
15 February, 1996·1. Heard counsel for the parties.2. Leave granted.3. We do not propose to state the facts leading up to this stage for the reason that there is a good amount of controversy as to correct factual situation between the counsel before us. Suffice it to say the following: When a demand was raised by the...
Supreme Court Of India
Pali Devi And Others vs Chairman Managing Committee and Anr
Judges: Punchhi, M M
15 February, 1996·O R D E R The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed the writ petition of the respondent Managing Committee of the Army School, Jallandhar, upsetting the orders of the Authority under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, on the premise that the appellants seeking relief were its ex-employees and not exist...
Supreme Court Of India
Abdul Aziz Abdul Razak and Anr vs The Municipal Corpn. Of ...
Judges: Ramaswamy, K
15 February, 1996·O R D E R Leave granted. We have heard the counsel on both sides. Notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act 1 of 1894 was published in 1981 and the award under Section 11 was made on May 9, 1984 awarding compensation at the rate of Rs.110/- per sq. yd. On reference under Section 18...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.