Mafatlal Industries Ltd , Ahmedabad Etc Etc vs Union Of India Etc Etc
Judges: K S Paripoornan Act Headnote
19 December, 1996·PETITIONER:COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX Vs. RESPONDENT:DR. KARAN SINGH AND OTHERS ETC. DATE OF JUDGMENT04/02/1993 BENCH:SHARMA, L.M. (CJ) BENCH:SHARMA, L.M. (CJ) BHARUCHA S.P. (J) PANDIAN, S.R. (J) MOHAN, S. (J) JEEVAN REDDY, B.P. (J) CITATION:1993 SCR (1) 560 1993 SCC Supl. (4) 500 JT 1993 (2) 32...
Supreme Court Of India
Mafatlal Industries Ltd , Ahmedabad Etc Etc vs Union Of India Etc Etc
Judges: K S Paripoornan Act Headnote
19 December, 1996·PETITIONER:PANNI LAL Vs. RESPONDENT:RAJINDER SINGH AND ANR. DATE OF JUDGMENT05/05/1993 BENCH:BHARUCHA S.P. (J) BENCH:BHARUCHA S.P. (J) PUNCHHI, M.M.CITATION:1993 SCR (3) 589 1993 SCC (4) 38 JT 1993 (3) 340 1993 SCALE (2)806 ACT:The Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956: Section 8--Intent ...
Supreme Court Of India
Mafatlal Industries Ltd , Ahmedabad Etc Etc vs Union Of India Etc Etc
Judges: K S Paripoornan Act Headnote
19 December, 1996·PETITIONER: C.I.T.Vs.RESPONDENT:EXPRESS NEWSPAPERS LTD. DATE OF JUDGMENT11/01/1994 BENCH:JEEVAN REDDY, B.P. (J) BENCH:JEEVAN REDDY, B.P. (J) VERMA, JAGDISH SARAN (J) YOGESHWAR DAYAL (J) CITATION:1994 AIR 1389 1994 SCR (1) 64 1994 SCC (2) 374 JT 1994 (1) 50 1994 SCALE (1)39 ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDG...
Supreme Court Of India
Mafatlal Industries Ltd , Ahmedabad Etc Etc vs Union Of India Etc Etc
Judges: K S Paripoornan Act Headnote
19 December, 1996·PETITIONER:R.S.D.V. FINANCE CO. PVT. LTD.Vs. RESPONDENT:VALLABH GLASS WORKS LTD. DATE OF JUDGMENT03/02/1993 BENCH:KASLIWAL, N.M. (J) BENCH:KASLIWAL, N.M. (J) KULDIP SINGH (J) JEEVAN REDDY, B.P. (J) CITATION:1993 AIR 2094 1993 SCR (1) 455 1993 SCC (2) 130 1993 SCALE (1)262 ACT:Code of Civil Pr...
Supreme Court Of India
Mafatlal Industries Ltd , Ahmedabad Etc Etc vs Union Of India Etc Etc
Judges: K S Paripoornan Act Headnote
19 December, 1996·PETITIONER:CHIRANJILAL SHRILAL GOENKA (DECEASED) THROUGH L RS.Vs. RESPONDENT:JASJIT SINGH AND ORS.DATE OF JUDGMENT18/03/1993 BENCH:RAMASWAMY, K. BENCH:RAMASWAMY, K. SAHAI, R.M. (J) CITATION:1993 SCR (2) 454 1993 SCC (2) 507 JT 1993 (2) 341 1993 SCALE (2)146 ACT:Arbitration Act :Sections 8, 14...
Supreme Court Of India
Mafatlal Industries Ltd , Ahmedabad Etc Etc vs Union Of India Etc Etc
Judges: K S Paripoornan Act Headnote
19 December, 1996·PETITIONER:SUBRAN @ SUBRAMANIAN AND ORS.Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF KERALA DATE OF JUDGMENT24/02/1993 BENCH:ANAND, A.S. (J) BENCH:ANAND, A.S. (J) VENKATACHALLIAH, M.N.(CJ) JEEVAN REDDY, B.P. (J) CITATION:1993 SCR (2) 84 1993 SCC (3) 32 JT 1993 (2) 194 1993 SCALE (1)685 ACT:Indian Penal Code, 1860...
Supreme Court Of India
Mafatlal Industries Ltd , Ahmedabad Etc Etc vs Union Of India Etc Etc
Judges: K S Paripoornan Act Headnote
19 December, 1996·PETITIONER:MAFATLAL INDUSTRIES LTD., AHMEDABAD ETC. ETC..Vs. RESPONDENT:UNION OF INDIA ETC. ETC..DATE OF JUDGMENT: 19/12/1996 BENCH:K.S. PARIPOORNAN ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:(With C.A. Nos. 3256-3270/84, 660/89, 541/89, 2/91, 2578 80/92, 1794/84, 921/92, 4952/91, 4412/91, 4878/91, 2/86, 6255/90, 289/...
Supreme Court Of India
Kalika Prasad and Anr vs Chhatrapal Singh (Dead) By Lrs
Judges: K Ramaswamy, G B Pattanaik
18 December, 1996·O R D E R This appeal by special arises from the judgment of the learned single Judge of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh made on October 12, 1985 in Second Appeal No.309/80.The admitted facts are that the appellant plaintiff filed a suit for declaration of title and for possession of agricultural l...
Supreme Court Of India
Jaspal Singh and Anr vs Union Of India and Anr
Judges: K Ramaswamy, G B Pattanaik
18 December, 1996·O R D E R This appeal by special leave arises from the judgment and order, made on November 15, 1985 by the Punjab & Haryana High Court dismissing in limine LPA No.1356 by confirming the judgment of the learned single Judge dated November 9, 1979 in RFA No.779/75.Notification under Section 4(1) of t...
Supreme Court Of India
People'S Union Of Civil Liberties ... vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Anr.
Judges: K Singh, S S Ahmad
18 December, 1996·ORDER Kuldip Singh, J.1. Telephone-Tapping is a serious invasion of an individual's privacy. With the growth of highly sophisticated communication technology, the right to hold telephone conversation, in the privacy of one's home or office without interference, is increasingly susceptible to abuse. ...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.