V L Patil vs Arjun Halappa Naikawadi and Ors
Judges: Punchhi, M M
07 August, 1996·O R D E R The appellant, the aggrieved party in these two special appeals, was granted/leave limited to the question as to whether the learned Single Judge of the High Court was justified in passing strictures against the appellant. On merit of the matter, the fate of the cases stands sealed.The ref...
Supreme Court Of India
The New Datar Transport Co.(Pvt.) ... vs Smt. Radhabai and Ors
Judges: Ramaswamy, K
07 August, 1996·O R D E R This appeal by special leave on the ground of pecuniary valuation arises from the judgment and order of the High Court Bombay made on July 18, 19 & 20, 1967 in F.A. No.63 & 79/64. The indisputed facts are that the S.D.O., R.J. Kulkarni was going in Jeep No.MPK-741 along with Tehsildar G.S....
Supreme Court Of India
Ganapathi National Middle School vs M. Durai Kannan (Dead) By Lrs. and Ors
Judges: Ramaswamy, K
07 August, 1996·O R D E R This appeal by special leave arises from the judgment and order of the Division Bench of the Madras High Court dated August 11, 1986 made in Writ Appeal No.761/1986. The undisputed facts are that the appellant middle imparting education upto the 8th standard was established way back in 192...
Supreme Court Of India
Chintaman and Anr vs State Of Maharashtra and Anr
Judges: Ramaswamy, K
07 August, 1996·O R D E R Notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition, 1894 (for Short, the 'Act') was published in respect of different parcels of lands on February 23, 1964 and March 1, 1964 acquiring an extent of 6.67 acres in the first notification and 2.75 acres in the second notification for the p...
Supreme Court Of India
Durga Das vs The Collector and Ors
Judges: Ramaswamy, K
07 August, 1996·O R D E R Counsel for the appellant states that the office report dated July 16, 1996 has been complied with.This appeal by special leave arises from the judgment of the High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla made in M.F.A.No.24/80 on May 5, 1984. The only question is: whether the-appellant is a ten...
Supreme Court Of India
Divakar Neekantha Hegde And ... vs State Of Karnataka
Judges: G Raya, K Venkataswami
07 August, 1996·ORDER K. Venkataswami, J.1. All these appeals by special leave are preferred against the common judgment of the Karnataka High Court in Criminal Appeal Nos. 791, 792 of 1988 and 129-130 of 1989 dated 20th July, 1990. Briefly stated the facts as presented by the prosecution are the following:2. P.W. ...
Supreme Court Of India
M\S Sirdanwal Industries vs Commissioner Of Sales Tax
Judges: Bharucha S P J
07 August, 1996·O R D E R The order under appeal is of the High Court at Allahabad in revision petitions filed by the Commissioner of Sales Tax under the U.P. Sales Tax Act. The question for consideration was whether brass wire manufactured by the assessee was classifiable as 'brassware' as claimed by the Revenue o...
Supreme Court Of India
The Land Acquisition Officer ... vs Belekal Krishna Bhat
Judges: Ramaswamy, K
07 August, 1996·THE 7TH DAY OF AUGUST, 1996 Present:Hon'ble Mr.Justice K.Ramaswamy Hon'ble Mr.Justice G.B.Pattanaik Mr. M.Veerappa, Advocate for the appellants. Mr.S.N.Bhat, Advocate for the respondent.O R D E R The following or Order of the Court was delivered: The Land Acquisition Officer & Assistant Commissioner...
Supreme Court Of India
Baldev Singh And Others vs State Of Pujnab Through Collector
Judges: K Ramaswamy, G Pattanaik
07 August, 1996·1. Notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act 1 of 1894 (for short, the 'Act') was published on January 29, 1982 acquiring a total extent of 193 kanals 3 marlas of land situated in village Lamin in Punjab State for construction of Hydel Channel. The Land Acquisition Collector awarde...
Supreme Court Of India
Tulsi Singh vs State Of Punjab
Judges: M K Mukherjee, S P Kurdukar
07 August, 1996·O R D E R Tulsi Singh, the appellant before us, was arraigned before the Special Court Ferozepur for the murder of his wife Chhinder Kaur. The trial ended in an order of conviction and sentence recorded against the appellant under Section 302 I.P.C. and aggrieved thereby he has filed the instant app...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.