C S Balan And Others vs Chief General Managertelecom And Others
Judges: Ray, G N J Ray, G N J Hansaria B L J Act Headnote
26 April, 1996·http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 1 PETITIONER:J.L. JAIN.Vs. RESPONDENT:UNION OF INDIA & ORS.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 15/02/1996 BENCH:RAMASWAMY, K. BENCH: RAMASWAMY, K.G.B. PATTANAIK (J) CITATION:1996 SCALE (2)SP74 ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:Leave granted.O R D E R We have...
Supreme Court Of India
C S Balan And Others vs Chief General Managertelecom And Others
Judges: Ray, G N J Ray, G N J Hansaria B L J Act Headnote
26 April, 1996·http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 1 PETITIONER:C.S.BALAN AND OTHERS Vs. RESPONDENT:CHIEF GENERAL MANAGERTELECOM AND OTHERS DATE OF JUDGMENT: 26/04/1996 BENCH:RAY, G.N. (J) BENCH:RAY, G.N. (J) HANSARIA B.L. (J) ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:Leave granted.O R D E R Heard ...
Supreme Court Of India
C S Balan And Others vs Chief General Managertelecom And Others
Judges: Ray, G N J Ray, G N J Hansaria B L J Act Headnote
26 April, 1996·PETITIONER:STATE OF U.P. & ANR.Vs. RESPONDENT:SHRI KRISHNA PANDEY DATE OF JUDGMENT: 01/03/1996 BENCH:RAMASWAMY, K. BENCH:RAMASWAMY, K.G.B. PATTANAIK (J) CITATION:1996 AIR 1656 1996 SCALE (3)1 ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:Leave granted.O R D E R We have heard learned counsel on both sides. This appeal...
Supreme Court Of India
M/S Veecumsees , Madras vs Commissioner Of Income Tax , Madras
Judges: S P Bharucha, G B Pattanaik Act Headnote
26 April, 1996·PETITIONER:M/S. VEECUMSEES, MADRAS Vs. RESPONDENT:COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MADRAS DATE OF JUDGMENT: 26/04/1996 BENCH:S.P. BHARUCHA , G.B. PATTANAIK ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:Leave granted O R D E R We are concerned with the following questions, which were answered, in the judgment and order of the ...
Supreme Court Of India
C S Balan And Others vs Chief General Managertelecom And Others
Judges: Ray, G N J Ray, G N J Hansaria B L J Act Headnote
26 April, 1996·PETITIONER:RAMESH SINGH & ANOTHER Vs. RESPONDENT:CINTA DEVI & OTHERS DATE OF JUDGMENT: 23/02/1996 BENCH:AHMADI A.M. (CJ) BENCH:AHMADI A.M. (CJ) MANOHAR SUJATA V. (J) CITATION:1996 AIR 1560 1996 SCC (3) 142 JT 1996 (5) 543 1996 SCALE (2)782 ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:O R D E R Special leave gran...
Supreme Court Of India
Mosammat Bibi Sayeeda and Ors. Etc vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. Etc
Judges: Ramaswamy, K
25 April, 1996·WITH CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 5046 OF 1984 & 332 OF 1985 AND CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7547 OF 1996 (Arising out of SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C).7495 OF 1985) J U D G M E N T K. RAMASWAMY,J.Leave granted in SLP (C) No.7495/85.These appeals by certificate granted by Patna. High Court under Articles 133(1) and 134-A of...
Supreme Court Of India
Suresh Kumar and Ors.Dalmia Cement ... vs Union Of India and Ors
Judges: K Ramaswamy, S Saghir Ahmad, G B Pattanaik
25 April, 1996·WITH TRANSFER CASE [C] NO.177 OF 1988 T.C. [C] Nos. 178-189, CMP No. 10091/89, 14930/89, IA Nos. 5 & 6/90 in TC No. S.1-7/89, CPM No. 25857/88, CPM No. 17552/89, TC Nos. 25-26/89, CPM Nos. 5913-14/89, 8736/89, TC No. 27/89, WP No. 1235/89, 1277/90, 1278/90, IA Nos. 1 & 5/89, in WP No. 922/90, 1164/9...
Supreme Court Of India
Golla Jalla Reddy and Ors vs State Of Andhra Pradesh
Judges: Mukherjee M K J
25 April, 1996·J U D G M E N T M.K. MUKHERJEE,J.In Sessions case No. 96 of 1983 on the file of the Sessions Judge, Anantpur 10 persons (hereinafter referred to as A1 to A10 respectively) were tried for criminal conspiracy, rioting with deadly weapons and murders of Kalapuram Paramasani Narasimhudu, Golla Jalla Mal...
Supreme Court Of India
State Through ... vs Krishanchand Khushalchand ...
Judges: Jeevan Reddy, B P J
25 April, 1996·J U D G M E N T B.P.JEEVAN REDDY,J.Leave granted. Heard counsel for the parties. Respondent, K.K.Jagtiani, was an Assistant Engineer in the service of the Municipal Corporation, Greater Bombay. On the basis of a complaint received, a trap was laid. The respondent was caught accepting the money. The ...
Supreme Court Of India
Kennedy Valley Welfare ... vs Ceylon Repartriates Labourers ...
Judges: K Singh, S Kurdukar
25 April, 1996·1. Krishna Nagar and Kennedy Valley Welfare Association and various other residents of the area filed bunch petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Madras seeking mandamus that the stone-crusher and stone-quarries operating in close vicinity to the residenti...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.