Mahe Beach Trading Co. and Etc vs Union Territory Of Pondicherry ...
Judges: Kirpal B N J
04 April, 1996·J U D G M E N T KIRPAL, J.The appellants are the dealers in petrol and diesel oil in the former french Establishment of Mahe now in the Union Territory of Pondicherry. The Erstwhile French Establishments in India were divided by the French Government into 17 communes approximating to Municipalities ...
Supreme Court Of India
Calcutta State Transport ... vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax, West ...
Judges: K Ramaswamy, S P Bharucha, K S Paripoornan
04 April, 1996·J U D G M E N T B.P.JEEVAN REDDY,J.This appeal is preferred on the basis or a certificate of fitness granted by the Calcutta High Court under Section 261 of the Income-tax Act. Two questions were referred for the opinion of the High Court under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act. They are:"(1) Whe...
Supreme Court Of India
Ghulam Din Buch Etc.Etc vs State Of Jammu and Kashmir
Judges: Hansaria B L J
03 April, 1996·J U D G M E N T HANSARIA. J.The 1975 accord with Sheikh Abdullah saw a dynamic person from Ladakh coming to the fore. He was made a Minister. He wanted to do many things for Ladakhis. One of the projects which the Minister (Shri Sonam Narboo) wanted to get fructified was electrification of tehsils o...
Supreme Court Of India
Smt. Kanchan Devi vs Promod Kumar Mittal and Anr
Judges: Anand, A S J
03 April, 1996·J U D G M E N T DR. ANAND.J.Leave granted.The marriage between the parties was solemnised on 18.4.73. According to the appellant she was thrown out of the matrimonial home, after she gave birth to four female children one after the other which annoyed her in-laws. Thereafter the respondent husband n...
Supreme Court Of India
State Bank Of Indian Staff ... vs State Bank Of Indian And Others
Judges: Faizan Uddin J
03 April, 1996·WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 713 OF 1995 State Bank of India Staff Association and another V.State Bank of Indian and others J U D G M E N T FAIZAN UDDIN, J.1. The parties in the aforementioned Civil Appeal and the Writ Petition are the same with the distinction that in the Civil Appeal, the appellants ha...
Supreme Court Of India
Smt. P. Mahalakshmi And Ors. vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax
Judges: B J Reddy, S C Sen
03 April, 1996·JUDGMENT B.P. Jeevan Reddy, J.1. These appeals are preferred against the judgment of the Karnataka High Court see . The question in short is-whether the compensation awarded under the head "Fourthly" in Sub-section (1) of Section 23 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, does, or does not, represent the...
Supreme Court Of India
Commissioner Of Wealth Tax, ... vs Raja Vishwanath Pratap Singh
Judges: Sen, S C J
03 April, 1996·J U D G M E N T SEN, J.The assessee Raja Vishwanath Pratap Singh is the son of late Captain Raja Bahadur Ram Gopal Singh, who was the owner of extensive zamindari and other properties. Ram Gopal Singh ran into debts. He applied under Section 4 of the U.P. Encumbered Estates Act, 1934 for the liquida...
Supreme Court Of India
Municipal Corporation Of Delhi vs Kamla Devi And Anr
Judges: Jeevan Reddy, B P J
03 April, 1996·J U D G M E N T B.P.JEEVAN REDDY, J.Leave granted. Heard the counsel for the appellant and respondents.This appeal is preferred against the judgment and decree of the learned Civil Judge, Ghaziabad [Uttar Pradesh] dated September 11, 1991 in Suit No.451 of 1990 in rather peculiar circumstances. Smt....
Supreme Court Of India
Commissioner Of Income Tax, ... vs Smt.R.Sharadamma
Judges: Jeevan Reddy, B P J
03 April, 1996·O R D E R This appeal is preferred against the order of the Karnataka High Court answering the question referred to it under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act in the affirmative, i.e., in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue. The question referred to the High Court reads:"Whether on the...
Supreme Court Of India
Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs National Palayacot Company
Judges: B J Reddy, S C Sen
03 April, 1996·ORDER B.P. Jeevan Reddy, J.1. In view of the findings recorded by the Tribunal that the expense in question was incurred upon maintaining the branch in Penang (Malaysia) of the assessee for promotion of sales of his products, the expenditure has been rightly held to be falling under Section 35B of t...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.