L.M. Mahurkar vs The Bar Council Of Maharashtra And ...
Judges: Sen, S C J
08 April, 1996·J U D G M E N T SEN, J.The appellant claims that he was a Sales Tax Practitioner in 1949 when the Central Provinces and Berar Sales Tax Act, 1947 was in force in the State of Madhya Pradesh and, thereafter he continued his practice in sales tax matters at Nagpur under the provisions of the Bombay Sa...
Supreme Court Of India
Union Of India (Uoi) And Anr. vs Suhrid Geigy Ltd.
Judges: S Sen, K Thomas
08 April, 1996·1. The dispute in this case is about the interpretation of the Notification issued by the Central Government on April 1, 1977 being G.S.R. 163 (E). In that notification the Government exempted clinical samples cleared by a manufacturer of patent or proprietary medicines falling under Item No. 14E of...
Supreme Court Of India
Saushish Diamonds Ltd. vs National Insurance Co. Ltd.
Judges: K Ramaswamy, G Pattanaik
08 April, 1996·1. The appellant has approached the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission for recovery of the loss of diamonds entrusted to the Commission Agent. The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi in its order dated 28-9-1995 passed the order holding that since the Insurance Co...
Supreme Court Of India
State Bank Of India vs Presiding Officer And Anr.
Judges: S Agrawal, G Nanavati
08 April, 1996·1. Leave granted.2. Respondent 2 was employed with the appellant as a Godown Darban during the period from 21-10-1973 to 28-2-1975. His services were terminated on 28-2-1975. He was subsequently appointed as Messenger by order dated 31-10-1987. After such appointment, Respondent 2 filed an applicati...
Supreme Court Of India
Ram Dulari Bai And Anr. vs Madanlal Bajaj
Judges: M Punchhi, K Thomas
08 April, 1996·1. Leave granted.2. The first appellant is the landlady of the demised premises. Joining with her as the second appellant is her son who is employed at Jabalpur (M.P.) on a transferable job. She, presently, lives with him. The respondent is a tenant in the demised premises situated in a town called ...
Supreme Court Of India
Superintendent, Govt. T.B. ... vs J. Srinivasan
Judges: B J Reddy, K Paripoornan
08 April, 1996·1. Leave granted.2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.3. This appeal is preferred against the judgment of a learned Single Member of the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal allowing the original application filed by the respondent.4. The respondent was a Male Nursing Assistant in the TB Hospital....
Supreme Court Of India
Bihar State Unemployed ... vs The State Of Bihar And Others
Judges: Ramaswamy, K
08 April, 1996·And Civil Appeal Nos.7518-20 of 1996 (Arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 8215-17 of 1996) O R D E R Delay condoned.Leave granted.We have heard learned counsel on both sides. The writ petitioners in the High Court as well as the State have come up in these appeals. It is not necessary for us to elaborate all...
Supreme Court Of India
Bhim Singh, Presidentjammu and ... vs The Election Commissioner Of ...
Judges: Ramaswamy, K
04 April, 1996·O R D E R This is a writ petition for a declaration that Section 30 (d) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, is unconstitutional and ultra vires Article 14 of the Constitution of India "as it does not specify the maximum period for holding the election after the withdrawal of nomination......
Supreme Court Of India
Bhim Singh, President JandK ... vs Election Commissioner Of India ...
Judges: K Ramaswamy, S Bharucha, K Paripoornan
04 April, 1996·1. This is a writ petition for a declaration that Section 30(d) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, is unconstitutional and ultra vires Article 14 of the Constitution of India "as it docs not specify the maximum period for holding the election after the withdrawal of nomination...", and f...
Supreme Court Of India
Bharat Builders (Pvt.) Ltd. and Ors vs Parijat Flat Owners ...
Judges: Ramaswamy, K
04 April, 1996·O R D E R Leave granted.While we are hearing the matter on the procedural part of listing for admission of the writ petitions filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India in Bombay High Court, Mr. Anil B. Diwan, learned senior counsel for the respondents, has stated that a direction may ...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.