State Of M P And Others vs Hyama Pardhi Etc Etc
Judges: K Ramaswamy, B L Hansaria Act Headnote
16 November, 1995·PETITIONER:OM PRAKASH Vs. RESPONDENT:AMAR SINGH & ANR.DATE OF JUDGMENT09/01/1987 BENCH:SINGH, K.N. (J) BENCH:SINGH, K.N. (J) MUKHARJI, SABYASACHI (J) CITATION:1987 AIR 617 1987 SCR (1) 968 1987 SCC (1) 458 JT 1987 (1) 199 1987 SCALE (1)35 CITATOR INFO :F 1988 SC 293 (5,7,12) ACT:U.P. C...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of M P And Others vs Hyama Pardhi Etc Etc
Judges: K Ramaswamy, B L Hansaria Act Headnote
16 November, 1995·http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 1 PETITIONER:STATE OF RAJASTHAN Vs. RESPONDENT:SEVA RAM & ORS.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 02/02/1996 BENCH:RAMASWAMY, K. BENCH:RAMASWAMY, K.G.B. PATTANAIK (J) CITATION:JT 1996 (3) 37 1996 SCALE (2)SP73 ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:O R D E R ...
Supreme Court Of India
Commissioner Of Income ... vs Shri Om Prakash, Etc. Etc
Judges: Jeevan Reddy, B P J
16 November, 1995·J U D G M E N T B.P. JEEVAN REDDY, J.A conflict of opinion among the High Courts on the meaning and interpretation or clauses (i) and (ii) of sub- section (1) of Section 64 (as they stood prior to 1st April, 1976) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 falls for resolution in this batch of appeals. Prior to Ap...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of M P And Others vs Hyama Pardhi Etc Etc
Judges: K Ramaswamy, B L Hansaria Act Headnote
16 November, 1995·PETITIONER:DR. J.N. BANAVALIKAR Vs. RESPONDENT:MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ANR. DATE OF JUDGMENT21/09/1995 BENCH:RAY, G.N. (J) BENCH:RAY, G.N. (J) MAJMUDAR S.B. (J) CITATION:1996 AIR 326 1995 SCC Supl. (4) 89 JT 1995 (7) 105 1995 SCALE (5)509 ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:G.N. RAY. J.Leave g...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of M P And Others vs Hyama Pardhi Etc Etc
Judges: K Ramaswamy, B L Hansaria Act Headnote
16 November, 1995·PETITIONER:STATE OF M.P. AND OTHERS Vs. RESPONDENT:HYAMA PARDHI ETC. ETC. DATE OF JUDGMENT16/11/1995 BENCH:K. RAMASWAMY, B.L. HANSARIA ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:Delay condoned. Leave granted.O R D E R These appeals by special leave arise from the order of the Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur M.P. Publi...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of M P And Others vs Hyama Pardhi Etc Etc
Judges: K Ramaswamy, B L Hansaria Act Headnote
16 November, 1995·PETITIONER:M/S GUJARAT POTTLING CO.LTD. & ORS.Vs. RESPONDENT:THE COCA COLA CO. & ORS. DATE OF JUDGMENT04/08/1995 BENCH:AGRAWAL, S.C. (J) BENCH:AGRAWAL, S.C. (J) AHMAD SAGHIR S. (J) CITATION:<table cellspacing="0" style="border-collapse:collapse;margin-left:8.5pt"><tbody><tr style="height:12pt"><td s...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of M P And Others vs Hyama Pardhi Etc Etc
Judges: K Ramaswamy, B L Hansaria Act Headnote
16 November, 1995·PETITIONER:RAVJI @ RAM CHANDRA Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF RAJASTHAN DATE OF JUDGMENT05/12/1995 BENCH:RAY, G.N. (J) BENCH:RAY, G.N. (J) NANAVATI G.T. (J) CITATION:1996 AIR 787 1996 SCC (2) 175 JT 1995 (8) 520 1995 SCALE (6)745 ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:G.N. RAY,J.Leave granted.J U D G M E N T This ...
Supreme Court Of India
Smt. Sneh Prabha Etc vs State Of U.P. and Anr
Judges: Ramaswamy, K
15 November, 1995·J U D G M E N T K. Ramaswamy. J.C.A. No.1869 of 1981 The State of Uttar Pradesh got published in the State Gazette the notification issued under Section 4 [1] of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [for short, "the Act"] on July 16, 1960, acquiring 287 acres of land in Ghaziabad for planned development b...
Supreme Court Of India
Municipal Council Waraseoni And ... vs Satish Chandra Jain And Anr
Judges: Punchhi, M M
15 November, 1995·O R D E R CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3360 OF 1979:------------------------------A Division Bench of Madhya Pradesh High Court, quashed on a writ petition, the bill and notice of demand, issued against the respondent under Section 164 of the M.P. Municipalities Act, 1961, on the basis that the fees sought to b...
Supreme Court Of India
Kartik Malhar vs State Of Bihar
Judges: Kuldip Singh, S Saghir Ahmad
15 November, 1995·JUDGMENT 1995 supp. 5 SCR 239 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by S. SAGHIR AHMAD, J. Leave granted.The well-known maxim that "Evidence has to be weighed and not counted" has been given statutory placement in section 134 of the Evidence Act which provides us under :"134. No particular number ...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.