State Of M P And Others vs Hyama Pardhi Etc Etc
Judges: K Ramaswamy, B L Hansaria Act Headnote
16 November, 1995·PETITIONER:THE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR,SIPCOT, MADRAS - 8 AND OR Vs. RESPONDENT:CONTROMIX PVT.LTD. BY ITS DIRECTOR(FINANCE) SEETHARAMAN, MAD DATE OF JUDGMENT12/05/1995 BENCH:AGRAWAL, S.C. (J) BENCH:AGRAWAL, S.C. (J) AHMAD SAGHIR S. (J) CITATION:1995 AIR 1632 1995 SCC (4) 595 JT 1995 (6) ...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of M P And Others vs Hyama Pardhi Etc Etc
Judges: K Ramaswamy, B L Hansaria Act Headnote
16 November, 1995·PETITIONER:KIRPAL SINGH, M.L.A.Vs. RESPONDENT:UTTAM SINGH & ANR.DATE OF JUDGMENT09/10/1985 BENCH:REDDY, O. CHINNAPPA (J) BENCH:REDDY, O. CHINNAPPA (J) VENKATARAMIAH, E.S. (J) ERADI, V. BALAKRISHNA (J) MISRA, R.B. (J) KHALID, V. (J) CITATION:1986 AIR 300 1985 SCR Supl. (3) 622 1985 SCC (4) 621 ...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of M P And Others vs Hyama Pardhi Etc Etc
Judges: K Ramaswamy, B L Hansaria Act Headnote
16 November, 1995·PETITIONER:STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Vs. RESPONDENT:NARAYAN RAO SHAM RAO DESHMUKH & ORS. DATE OF JUDGMENT19/03/1985 BENCH:VENKATARAMIAH, E.S. (J) BENCH:VENKATARAMIAH, E.S. (J) REDDY, O. CHINNAPPA (J) MISRA, R.B. (J) CITATION:1985 AIR 716 1985 SCR (3) 358 1985 SCC (2) 321 1985 SCALE (1)601 ACT:Mah...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of M P And Others vs Hyama Pardhi Etc Etc
Judges: K Ramaswamy, B L Hansaria Act Headnote
16 November, 1995·PETITIONER:MARY JOHNY Vs. RESPONDENT:UNION OF INDIA & ORS.DATE OF JUDGMENT07/12/1995 BENCH:RAMASWAMY, K. BENCH:RAMASWAMY, K. HANSARIA B.L. (J) CITATION:1996 SCC (1) 484 JT 1995 (9) 218 1995 SCALE (7)251 ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:Leave granted.O R D E R We have heard the counsel on both sides. This a...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of M P And Others vs Hyama Pardhi Etc Etc
Judges: K Ramaswamy, B L Hansaria Act Headnote
16 November, 1995·PETITIONER:JETHI DEVI Vs. RESPONDENT:BHAKRA BEAS MANAGEMENT BOARD AND ANR DATE OF JUDGMENT24/08/1995 BENCH:RAMASWAMY, K. BENCH:RAMASWAMY, K. HANSARIA B.L. (J) CITATION:1995 SCC (6) 61 1995 SCALE (5)171 ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:Leave granted.O R D E R This appeal by special leave arises from the judg...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of M P And Others vs Hyama Pardhi Etc Etc
Judges: K Ramaswamy, B L Hansaria Act Headnote
16 November, 1995·PETITIONER:RANJIT KUMAR MAJUMDAR Vs. RESPONDENT:UNION OF INDIA & ORS.DATE OF JUDGMENT28/11/1995 BENCH:JEEVAN REDDY, B.P. (J) BENCH:JEEVAN REDDY, B.P. (J) MAJMUDAR S.B. (J) CITATION:1996 SCC (1) 51 JT 1995 (8) 350 1995 SCALE (6)646 ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:O R D E R This short order is to indicate t...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of M P And Others vs Hyama Pardhi Etc Etc
Judges: K Ramaswamy, B L Hansaria Act Headnote
16 November, 1995·PETITIONER:G. SUNDARASAN Vs. RESPONDENT:UNION OF INDIA & ANR.DATE OF JUDGMENT12/07/1995 BENCH:RAMASWAMY, K. BENCH:RAMASWAMY, K. HANSARIA B.L. (J) CITATION:1996 AIR 668 1995 SCC (4) 644 JT 1995 (5) 568 1995 SCALE (4)464 ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:O R D E R The petitioner was admittedly appointed ...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of M P And Others vs Hyama Pardhi Etc Etc
Judges: K Ramaswamy, B L Hansaria Act Headnote
16 November, 1995·PETITIONER:B. GANGADHAR Vs. RESPONDENT:B.G. RAJALINGAM DATE OF JUDGMENT12/05/1995 BENCH:RAMASWAMY, K. BENCH:RAMASWAMY, K.AHMAD SAGHIR S. (J) CITATION:1996 AIR 780 1995 SCC (5) 238 JT 1995 (5) 630 1995 SCALE (4)549 ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:O R D E R This petition arises from the order of the An...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of M P And Others vs Hyama Pardhi Etc Etc
Judges: K Ramaswamy, B L Hansaria Act Headnote
16 November, 1995·PETITIONER:ANIL KUMAR GUPTA, ETC.Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ORS. DATE OF JUDGMENT28/07/1995 BENCH:JEEVAN REDDY, B.P. (J) BENCH:JEEVAN REDDY, B.P. (J) SEN, S.C. (J) CITATION:1995 SCC (5) 173 JT 1995 (5) 505 1995 SCALE (4)573 ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:B.P. JEEVAN REDDY.J.J U D G M E N T...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of M P And Others vs Hyama Pardhi Etc Etc
Judges: K Ramaswamy, B L Hansaria Act Headnote
16 November, 1995·PETITIONER:SAWAN RAM MALRA Vs. RESPONDENT:UNION OF INDIA & ORS.DATE OF JUDGMENT13/09/1995 Leave granted.The short question which arises for consideration in this appeal is whether the appellant is eligible for promotion to Postal Superintendents/ Post-masters Group ‘B’ posts under the six per cent q...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.