Consumer Unity and Trust Society, ... vs The Chairman and Managing Director, ...
Judges: Sahai, R M J
31 January, 1995·1. The short question that arises for consideration in this appeal directed against judgment of National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi, is whether a banking company which renders service within meaning of clause (g) of Section 2 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (referred in b...
Supreme Court Of India
Consumer Unity and Trust Society vs Chairman and Managing Director
Judges: Sahai, R M J
31 January, 1995·The Judgment of the Court was delivered by R.M. SAHAI, J.- The short question that arises for consideration in this appeal directed against judgment of National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi, is whether a banking company which renders service within meaning of clause (g) of Secti...
Supreme Court Of India
R. Rajagopal Reddy And Ors. ... vs Padmini Chandrasekharan ...
Judges: K Singh, B Hansaria, S Majmudar
31 January, 1995·JUDGMENT IN MITHILESH KUMARI v. PREM BEHARI KHARE--Appeal before larger Bench.Ratio :Section 4(1) of Benami Act cannot be pressed in service in connection with suits filed prior to coming into operation of that section. The view that under section 4(2), in all suits filed by persons in whose names p...
Supreme Court Of India
Devku Bhikha vs State Of Gujarat
Judges: M M Punchhi, K J Reddy
31 January, 1995·1. This is a case of peculiar angularities. The deceased Ramniklal was a middle aged school Head Master working at a village known as Akala. In order to go to his place of work he was waiting on the day of occurrence at bus stand Lathi whereat the appellant herein, Devku Bhikha, a young man, came. T...
Supreme Court Of India
R. Rajagopal Reddy (Dead) By L.Rs. ... vs Padmini Chandrasekharan (Dead) ...
Judges: K Singh, B Hansaria, S Majmudar
31 January, 1995·ORDER S.B. Majmudar, J.1. In this group of matters a common question arises for our consideration. It is to the following effect 'whether Section 4(1) of the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to 'Act') can be applied to suit, claim or action to enforce any right in pr...
Supreme Court Of India
Sate Of Punjab And Ors vs Chaman Lal Goyal
Judges: Jeevan Reddy, B P J
31 January, 1995·1. Leave granted. Heard counsel for the parties.2.Under the order impugned herein, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana has quashed the memo of charges communicated to the respondent-writ petitioner as well as the order appointing the enquiry officer to enquire into those charges. A further directio...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Tamil Nadu vs Thirukkural Perumal
Judges: Anand, A S J
31 January, 1995·1. Leave granted.2. This appeal arises out of an order made by a learned Single Judge of the High Court of Judicature at Madras on 9th November, 1993, in Criminal Original Petition No.8730/92, Crl. M.P.No.4794/92 and Crl.M.P. 6765/92. The learned Judge quashed the First Information Report, Crime No....
Supreme Court Of India
Shyam And Another vs State Of Maharashtra
Judges: M M Punchhi, K Jayachandra
31 January, 1995·1. Despite the concurrent findings of the Courts below that the prosecutrix was taken out of the lawful guardianship of her mother, for which the appellants were accountable under Section 366, I.P.C. we have come to the view on going through the record and hearing learned Counsel that the prosecutri...
Supreme Court Of India
Syed Azam Hussaini vs The Andhra Bank Ltd
Judges: Agrawal, S C J
31 January, 1995·1. This appeal, by special leave, arises 39 out of proceedings initiated by the appellant under Section 41 of the Andhra Pradesh Shops and Commercial Establishments Act, 1966, hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'.2. The appellant was appointed in the clerical grade of the respondent-bank by order da...
Supreme Court Of India
N. Sukumaran Nair vs Food Inspector, Mavelikara
Judges: M Punchhi, K J Reddy
31 January, 1995·1. A sample of ice-cream purchased by the Food Inspector from the appellant was reported by the Public Analyst to be adulterated because of reduction of milk-fat and total solids in the product. Yet, the Trial Court acquitted the appellant on the ground that Rule 18 of the Prevention of Food Adulter...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.