Burn Standard Co. Ltd. and Ors vs Shri Dinabandhu Majumdar and Anr
Judges: Venkatachala N J
21 April, 1995·VENKATACHALA, J.1. Special leave sought for, is granted.2. This appeal by special leave arises from the judgment dated 14.1.1993 of a Division Bench of the High Court of Calcutta dismissing Appeal No. 149/91 directed against the order dated 18.4.1991 of a learned Single Judge of the same Court made ...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Orissa And Others vs Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd. And ...
Judges: A A Bharucha, K Paripoornan
21 April, 1995·ORDER K.S. Paripoornan, J.1. The State of Orissa and the authorities in the Mines Department of the State are the appellants in this batch of appeals, M/s. Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd., a Government company, in whom the lands in question vests in accordance with Section 11 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acq...
Supreme Court Of India
Orissa State Electricity Board ... vs M/S. Ipi Steel Ltd. Etc
Judges: Jeevan Reddy, B P J
21 April, 1995·B.P. JEEVAN REDDY, J.:1. Leave granted. Heard counsel for the parties.2. The Orissa State Electricity Board is questioning in this appeal the correctness of the judgment of the Orissa High Court declaring the proviso to Regulation 46 of the Orissa State Electricity Board (General Conditions of Suppl...
Supreme Court Of India
Trustees Of Port Of Madras vs Nagavedu Lungi And Company And Ors
Judges: Kuldip Singh, N Venkatachala, S Saghir Ahmad
21 April, 1995·JUDGMENT 1995 (2) SCR 669 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by VENKATACHALA, J. The appellant was the plaintiff in suit - O.S. No. 3980/69 in City Civil Court at Madras, while respondents-1 to 5 were defendants-I to 5 therein. That suit had been instituted by the plaintiff-the trustees of Port...
Supreme Court Of India
S.B. Shahane And Ors vs State Of Maharashtra And Anr
Judges: Kuldip Singh, N Venkatachala
21 April, 1995·JUDGMENT 1995 (3) SCR 672 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by VENKATACHALA, J. Judgment dated 31st July, 1981, by which a Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, rejected the Special Leave Application No. 317 of 1979 filed under Article 226 of the Constitution ...
Supreme Court Of India
Dr. Rashmi Srivastava vs Vikram University and Ors
Judges: Majmudar S B J
20 April, 1995·MAJMUDAR, J.:1. These two civil appeals arise out of a common judgment rendered by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Indore Bench on 23rd February, 1994. The High Court allowed two writ petitions against Vikram University and other contesting respondents. The contesting respondents after obtaining s...
Supreme Court Of India
K.P. Singhal vs State Of Rajasthan And Another
Judges: A A I, S Bharucha, K Paripoornan
20 April, 1995·1. The short question which arises for consideration relates to the interpretation of Sub-rule (3) of Rule 32 of the Rajasthan Administrative Service Rules, 1954. The said Sub-rule reads as under:(3) No member of the service who has not completed 3 years' service on the selection scale posts and 20 ...
Supreme Court Of India
Scheduled Caste Uplift Union And ... vs Union Of India And Ors
Judges: R M Sahai, B L Hansaria
20 April, 1995·JUDGMENT 1995 (3) SCR 634 The following Order of the Court was delivered:The petitioners working under the Directorate General of Quality Assurance and holding the post of Junior Scientific Officers, a Class-II post on the date the petition was filed, seek a direction that the amendment in the Rules...
Supreme Court Of India
Ram Chandra Sharma vs Modern Food Industries (India) ...
Judges: K Singh, N Venkatachala, S S Ahmad
20 April, 1995·1. The appellant at the relevant time was working with the respondent-Company as a skilled worker. He filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Delhi High Court challenging his super-session for the post of Fitter Grade I by persons allegedly junior to him. The ...
Supreme Court Of India
Commissioner Of Income Tax, ... vs Thanthi Trust, Madras
Judges: A Ahmadi, S Bharucha, K Paripoornan
20 April, 1995·1. This is a direct reference under Section 257 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The two questions which are referred for our decision read as under (1) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances 'of the case, the Appellate Tribunal is justified in law in holding that the reassessment under Section ...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.