Hindustan Platinum Pvt. Ltd. vs Collector Of Central Excise
Judges: S Bharucha, K Paripoornan
05 April, 1995·1. Tariff Item 24 as it stood at the relevant point of time prescribed the excise duty at 7 paise per 10 gms. of silver. The appellants had filed a classification list in regard to articles of silver, namely, (a) pure silver contacts, (b) pure silver wires, rods, (c) pure silver foils, sheets, strip...
Supreme Court Of India
V. Charulatha and Ors vs S. Gunalan, Chairman, Railway ...
Judges: Sahai, R M J
04 April, 1995·ORDER R.M. SAHAI, J.1. These applications have arisen in extremely unfortunate circumstance. The anxiety of this Court to avoid taking any drastic action appears to have not been property appreciated and even though two years have elapsed since the learned Ad- ditional Solicitor General assured the ...
Supreme Court Of India
Sahney Paris Rhone Ltd vs Collector Of Central Excise ...
Judges: R M Sahai, S B Majmudar, Sujata V Manohar
04 April, 1995·JUDGMENT 1995 (3) SCR 150 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by MAJMUDAR, J. This appeal is moved by the appellant assessees under Section 35-L of the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") against the order dated 24th September, 1987, passed by the Customs, Ex...
Supreme Court Of India
Laxmi Engineering Works vs P.S.G. Industrial Institute
Judges: Jeevan Reddy, B P J
04 April, 1995·B.P.JEEVAN REDDY, J.:1. Leave granted. Heard counsel for both the parties.2. The definition of the expression " consumer" in clause(d) of Section 2 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 ex- cludes from its purview "a person who obtains such goods for resale or for any commercial purpose". The questio...
Supreme Court Of India
Advaita Nand vs Judge, Small Cause Court, Meerut ...
Judges: S Agrawal, S V Manohar
04 April, 1995·JUDGMENT S.C. Agrawal, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal by the tenant arises out of a suit for eviction filed by respondent No. 3 on the ground of default in payment of rent under the provisions of the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 (hereinafter referred t...
Supreme Court Of India
Lakhanpal National Ltd. Baroda vs Collector Of Central Excise, ...
Judges: A A M, S Bharucha, K Paripoornan
04 April, 1995·1. The Assistant Collector of Central Excise, Baroda, clubbed the two items described as calots and pellets of zinc together under Tariff Items 26B(1) and 26B(2a). The Collector of Central Excise (Appeals) reversed this finding holding that they were not synonymous and the decision of the Assistant ...
Supreme Court Of India
Collector Of Central Excise ... vs Kohinoor Mills Bombay
Judges: R M Sahai, S B Majmudar
04 April, 1995·JUDGMENT 1995 (3) SCR 159 WITH C.A. No. 5408 of 1990.The Judgment of the Court was delivered by MAJMUDAR, J. These appeals involve a common question for our consideration. It is to the effect 'when yarn was manufactured in the weaving department of a composite textile mill and was captively consumed...
Supreme Court Of India
Salamat Ali And Another vs State Of Bihar
Judges: M M Punchhi, K J Reddy
04 April, 1995·1. Appellant, Salamat Ali, was the father-in-law and appellant, Anwari Begum, was the mother-in-law of Jahanara, deceased. The husband of the deceased, Md. Salim Ahmed, was a co-accused with the former two. The aforesaid three were tried for offences under Sections 302/34 and 304B/34, I.P.C. for cau...
Supreme Court Of India
Lal Mandi vs State Of West Bengal
Judges: Dr A S Anand, M K Mukherjee
04 April, 1995·JUDGMENT 1995 (3) SCR 134 The Judgement of the Court was delivered by DR. ANAND, J. The appellant alongwith four absconding accused Man Singh, Babu Lal, Arjan and a son-in-law of Ganesh was charge-sheeted for committing the murder of Dullen Maddi, wife of PW2, Murka Maddi on 31.8.1982 at about 8.00 ...
Supreme Court Of India
Commissioner Of Income Tax, ... vs Bijoy Kumar Almal
Judges: Jeevan Reddy, B P J
04 April, 1995·B.P.JEEVAN REDDY, J.:1. This appeal is preferred by the Revenue against the judgment of the Calcutta High Court answering the question referred to it in favour of the assessee and against the revenue. The question referred under Section 256(1) of the Income-Tax Act was "(W)hether, on the facts and i...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.