Jai Kishan vs Commissioner Of Police And Anr
Judges: K Ramaswamy, B L Hansaria
10 April, 1995·JUDGMENT 1995 (3) SCR 268 The following Order of the Court was delivered : Leave granted.We have heard the counsel on both the sides. The appellant was appointed as a Temporary Constable on September 9, 1982. After his undergoing training, he was posted to 7th Bn. The Central Services Temporary (Ser...
Supreme Court Of India
Rambhai Lakhanbai Bhakt vs State Of Gujarat And Ors
Judges: K Ramaswamy, B L Hansaria
10 April, 1995·JUDGMENT 1995 (3) SCR 272 The following Order of the Court was delivered:After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner at length, we find that it is not a fit case for interference. It is seen that admittedly a notice was issued under Section 5A to the petitioner on July 18,1991 calling upon the ...
Supreme Court Of India
Mohan Singh Etc vs State Of Punjab And Ors. Etc
Judges: K Ramaswamy, B L Hansaria
10 April, 1995·JUDGMENT 1995 (3) SCR 264 The following Order of the Court was delivered: Leave granted.Appellant, Mohan Singh, was promoted as an Assistant on 20.10.1973 and was confirmed with effect from 13.10.1980. When vacancy in the post of Superintendent Grade-I arose on 27.11.1989 on promotion of one Gurdev ...
Supreme Court Of India
Indian Oil Corporation Ltd vs Municipal Corporation & Anr
Judges: J S Verma, S Sujata V Manohar Jj Act Headnote
07 April, 1995·PETITIONER:SMT. NUTAN ARVIND Vs. RESPONDENT:UNION OF INDIA & ANR.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 15/01/1996 BENCH:RAMASWAMY, K. BENCH:RAMASWAMY, K.G.B. PATTANAIK (J) CITATION:1996 SCC (2) 488 JT 1996 (1) 699 1996 SCALE (1)656 ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:Leave granted.O R D E R This appeal by special leave arise...
Supreme Court Of India
Indian Oil Corporation Ltd vs Municipal Corporation & Anr
Judges: J S Verma, S Sujata V Manohar Jj Act Headnote
07 April, 1995·PETITIONER:STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH & ORS.ETC.Vs. RESPONDENT:GANESH WOOD PRODUCTS & ORS.ETC. DATE OF JUDGMENT11/09/1995 BENCH:JEEVAN REDDY, B.P. (J) BENCH:JEEVAN REDDY, B.P. (J) MUKHERJEE M.K. (J) CITATION:1996 AIR 149 1995 SCC (6) 363 JT 1995 (6) 485 1995 SCALE (5)303 ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMEN...
Supreme Court Of India
Dahiben W/O Ranchhodji Jivanji ... vs Vasanji Kevalbhai (Dead) And Ors. ...
Judges: K Ramaswamy, B L Hansaria
07 April, 1995·JUDGMENT 1995 (3) SCR 234 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by HANSARIA, J. In this appeal we are basically concerned with the interpretation of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 (for short the 'Act') as amended by Bombay Act No. 33 of 1952. Being concerned with a legislation...
Supreme Court Of India
Kajaria Exports Ltd. And Ors vs Union Of India And Ors
Judges: S C Agrawal, Sujata V Manohar
07 April, 1995·JUDGMENT 1995 (3) SCR 227 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by MRS. SUJATA V. MANOHAR, J. The appellants imported 5000 metric tonnes of white cement which arrived at the Port of Bombay on or about 17.11.1984. The appellants filed bills of entry for home consumption in respect of the goods so i...
Supreme Court Of India
Vasanji Keval (Dead) And Others vs Morarbhai Ranchhodbhai And ...
Judges: K Ramaswamy, B Hansaria
07 April, 1995·ORDER B.L. Hansaria, J.1. The appellants herein, who are respondents in C.A.No. 1578 of 1974, having been held in the judgment rendered in that appeal today to be protected tenants, this appeal has to be allowed inasmuch as the learned single Judge of the High Court decided against the appellants be...
Supreme Court Of India
R.Manicka Naicker Etc vs E. Elumalai Naicker Etc
Judges: S C Agrawal, Sujata V Manohar
07 April, 1995·JUDGMENT 1995 (3) SCR 217 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by MRS. SUJATA V. MAHOHAR, J. Delay in filing special leave petitions out of which Civil Appeals No. 111 and 112 of 1984 arise, is condoned.Leave in Special Leave Petition No. 2186 of 1995 is granted.The land which is the subject matt...
Supreme Court Of India
Dahiben Widow Of Ranchhodji ... vs Vasanji Kevalbhai (Dead) And ...
Judges: K Ramaswamy, B Hansaria
07 April, 1995·ORDER B.L. Hansaria, J.1. In this appeal we are basically concerned with the interpretation of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 (for short the 'Act') as amended by Bombay Act No. 33 of 1952. Being concerned with a legislation beneficial to tenants, the courts are required to give ...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.