Juthika Mulick vs Dr Mahendra Yashwant Bal
Judges: Mohan, S J
28 October, 1994·The Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.MOHAN, J.- This appeal arises out of the certificate issued by the High Court of Calcutta under Article 133(a) and (b) of the Constitution of India.2.The facts are simple. Being simple it is fascinating. However, the fascination is only superficial, ultim...
Supreme Court Of India
Committee Of Management, K.D. ... vs Shambhu Saran Pandey
Judges: Ramaswamy, K
28 October, 1994·1. Leave granted.2. Admittedly, the respondent acted as a principal of the appellant's Institution. The charge levelled against the respondent was that he had misappropriated certain funds belonging to the Institution. Therefore, on + From the Judgment and Order dated 5-2-1993 of the High Court of A...
Supreme Court Of India
Mahabir Biswas And Another vs State Of W.B
Judges: Mukherjee M K J
28 October, 1994·The Judgment of the Court was delivered by M.K. MUKHERJEE, J.- Mahabir Biswas and Shiba @ Bijoy Krishna Dutta, the two appellants herein, along with six others, including one Amit Haldar @ Pagla, were arraigned before the Court of Session for offences punishable under Sections 364/34, 302/34, 201/34...
Supreme Court Of India
B. Bhadriah And Others vs State Of Andhra Pradesh
Judges: M Punchhi, K J Reddy, R Sahai
28 October, 1994·ORDER K. Jayachandra Reddy, J.1. This is an appeal under Section 2(a) of the Supreme Court (Enlargement of Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Act read with Section 379 Cr.P.C. The five appellants (original accused Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5) were tried alongwith four others for offences punishable under Se...
Supreme Court Of India
Sarat Kumar Dash and Ors vs Biswajit Patnaik and Ors
Judges: Ramaswamy, K
27 October, 1994·1. Delay condoned.2. Leave granted.3.Heard the learned counsel. While the appellants and respondents-Biswajit Patnalk and Jagannath Prasad Mishra were continuing as Drug Inspectors, four vacancies for the post of Asstt. Drugs Controller, (junior Class-I) have arisen. Preceding regular appointment, t...
Supreme Court Of India
Land Acquisition and Anr. Etc vs Smt. Jasti Rohini and Anr. Etc
Judges: Ramaswamy, K
27 October, 1994·1. Leave granted.2. In disposal of the three appeals by this common judgment, we shall refer to SLP(C) No. 12300/94 as first case and to SLP(C) Nos.3528-29 as second case.3. Notification issued under s.4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 in the first case was published on June 16, 1983 for acquir...
Supreme Court Of India
Special Land Acquisition Officer ... vs Sidappa Omanna Tumari And Ors. Etc
Judges: K Ramaswamy, S C Agrawal, N Venkatachala
27 October, 1994·JUDGMENT WITH Civil Appeal Nos. 2589-97 of 1994.1994 SUPPL. (5) SCR 207 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by VENKATACHALA, J. These appeals by special leave preferred by the Land Acquisition Officer of the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board and the Karnataka Industrial Areas Developm...
Supreme Court Of India
Land Acquisition Officer, Eluru ... vs Jasti Rohini (Smt) And Anr.
Judges: K Ramaswamy, N Venkatachala
27 October, 1994·1. Leave granted.2. In disposal of the throe appeals by this common judgment, we shall refer to SLP(C) No. 12300/94 as first case and to SLP(C) Nos. 3528-29 as second case.3. Notification issued under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 in the first case was published on June 16, 1983 for...
Supreme Court Of India
Land Aquisition Officer vs Jasti Rohini
Judges: Ramaswamy, K
27 October, 1994·1. Leave granted.2. In disposal of the three appeals by this common judgment, we shall refer to SLP (C) No. 12300 of 1994 as first case and to SLP (C) Nos. 352829 of 1994 as second case.3. Notification issued under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 in the first case was published on 16-...
Supreme Court Of India
Calcutta Municipal Corporation and ... vs Anil Ratan Banerjee And Ors
Judges: B P Jeevan Reddy, Suhas C Sen
26 October, 1994·JUDGMENT IN SLP(C) No. 10331 of 1994.1994 SUPPL. (5) SCR 191 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by B.P. JEEVAN REDDY, J.Leave granted. Heard counsel for the parties.The appeal is preferred by the Calcutta Municipal Corporation against the judgment of a Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court ...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.