Bate Krishna Damani ( Dead ) By His Lrs vs Kailash Chand Srivastava & Anr
Judges: Act Headnote
11 November, 1994·1. Delay condoned.2. Leave granted.3. Heard the learned counsel. While the appellants and respondents-Biswajit Patnalk and Jagannath Prasad Mishra were continuing as Drug Inspectors, four vacancies for the post of Asstt. Drugs Controller, (junior Class-I) have arisen. Preceding regular appointment,...
Supreme Court Of India
Bate Krishna Damani ( Dead ) By His Lrs vs Kailash Chand Srivastava & Anr
Judges: Act Headnote
11 November, 1994·PETITIONER:DURGA NARAYAN Vs. RESPONDENT:CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, DENA BANK DATE OF JUDGMENT20/01/1995 BENCH:HANSARIA B.L. (J) BENCH:HANSARIA B.L. (J) AHMADI A.M. (CJ) SEN, S.C. (J) CITATION:1995 SCC Supl. (1) 346 JT 1995 (1) 633 1995 SCALE (1)306 ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:1. The Government of In...
Supreme Court Of India
Bate Krishna Damani ( Dead ) By His Lrs vs Kailash Chand Srivastava & Anr
Judges: Act Headnote
11 November, 1994·PETITIONER:HABIBULLA KHAN Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF ORISSA & ANR. DATE OF JUDGMENT02/02/1995 BENCH:SAWANT, P.B. BENCH:SAWANT, P.B. RAY, G.N. (J) CITATION:<table cellspacing="0" style="border-collapse:collapse;margin-left:8.5pt"><tbody><tr style="height:12pt"><td style="width:90pt"><p class="s1" style=...
Supreme Court Of India
Bate Krishna Damani ( Dead ) By His Lrs vs Kailash Chand Srivastava & Anr
Judges: Act Headnote
11 November, 1994·PETITIONER:P.RAM REDDY ETC.Vs. RESPONDENT:LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER HYDERABAD DATE OF JUDGMENT27/01/1995 BENCH:VENKATACHALA N. (J) BENCH:VENKATACHALA N. (J) RAMASWAMY, K.CITATION:1995 SCC (2) 305 JT 1995 (1) 593 1995 SCALE (1)332 ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:VENKATACHALA, J.:1. Having granted leave to a...
Supreme Court Of India
Bate Krishna Damani ( Dead ) By His Lrs vs Kailash Chand Srivastava & Anr
Judges: Act Headnote
11 November, 1994·1. Leave granted.2. For the disposal of the point in controversy the facts in C.A.No.1088/95 SLP(c) No.9649/93 lie in a short compass are as under:The respondent, Jagdish Chander, was appointed as a constable on October 30, 1985. Since he was absent from duty from April 20, 1992 to May 15, 1992,...
Supreme Court Of India
Suryakant Govind Oke vs State Of Maharashtra
Judges: A Anand, M Mukherjee
10 November, 1994·ORDER A.S. Anand and M.K. Mukherjee. JJ,1. Leave granted.2. The appellant has called in question an order of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal. Bombay dated 24-12-1992. Brief facts need a notice.3. The appellant joined the service of Zilla Parishad at Thane and was promoted as Class II Gazette...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Haryana vs Raghubir Dayal
Judges: Ramaswamy, K
10 November, 1994·1. Leave granted.2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.3. Notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act 1894 (1 of 1894) (for short 'the Act'), was published in the State Gazette on 25-10-1988, in the local newspapers Dainik Veer (Hindi) and in Indian Express on 16-11-1988. The ...
Supreme Court Of India
Kumar Jagdish Chandra Sinha vs Eileen K.Patricia D'Rozarie
Judges: Mukherjee M K J
10 November, 1994·The Judgment of the Court was delivered by M.K. MUKHERJEE, J.- IA No. 2 of 1994 allowed.2.At all material times one Mrs Sira Menan was a tenant under the appellants in respect of a flat in premises No. 23, Lindsay Street, Calcutta. After her death on 12-8-1970, the appellants filed the suit, out of ...
Supreme Court Of India
Ganga Prasad Verma Etc vs State Of Bihar And Ors. Etc
Judges: K Ramaswamy, N Venkatachala
10 November, 1994·JUDGMENT 1994 SUPPL. (5) SCR 455 The following Order of the Court was delivered:Leave granted.The appellant, while working as an Assistant Professor, was promoted as an Associate Professor in Neuro Surgery, by proceedings dated September 17, 1993. In the meanwhile, Dr. Basant Kumar Singh, respondent...
Supreme Court Of India
Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti vs Orient Paper and Industris Ltd
Judges: Sawant, P B
09 November, 1994·The Judgment of the Court was delivered by SAWANT, J.- The respondent-Orient Paper Mills (for short `Mills') purchases bamboos as raw material under a contract with the State Government which holds monopoly in regard to bamboos as a forest produce in view of the provisions of the M.R Van Upaj (Vyapa...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.