R.P.F. Commr vs K.T. Rolling Mills Pvt. Ltd
Judges: Hansaria B L J
22 November, 1994·The Judgment of the Court was delivered by B.L. HANSARIA, J. The Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (hereinafter the 'Act') was enacted to serve beneficent purpose and it does constitute a welfare measure, as it seeks to create a fund which could be drawn upon by certa...
Supreme Court Of India
Sales Tax Officer Kanpur And Ors vs Union Of India And Anr
Judges: B P Jeevan Reddy, N P Singh, S B Majmudar
21 November, 1994·JUDGMENT 1994 SUPPL. (5) SCR 593 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by B.P. JEEVAN REDDY, J. A common question arises in these matters. Civil Appeal No. 1635 of 1987 is preferred against the judgment of Allahabad High Court allowing Writ Petition (C) No. 914 of 1986 filed by the Union Of India....
Supreme Court Of India
Director Of Education vs Gajedhar Prasad Verma
Judges: Ramaswamy, K
21 November, 1994·1. Leave granted.2. We have heard learned counsel for the parties.3. This appeal by special leave arises from the order of the Allahabad High Court in CMWP No. 2669 of 1990 dated 11 - 11- 1992. The admitted facts are that one Hariram Yadav, while working as clerk, went on leave. In the leave vacancy...
Supreme Court Of India
K. Subramaniam vs Ponnusami And Another
Judges: J Verma, K Paripoornan
21 November, 1994·1. Leave granted. Heard.2. The appellant was Advocate General of the State of Tamil Nadu. Writ Petition No. 4167 of 1994 and writ Miscellaneous Petition No. 9612 of 1994 were filed by one Ponnusami, Respondent No. 1 herein challenging his appointment as Advocate General. In that writ petition, a pre...
Supreme Court Of India
Ravindra Singh vs Phool Singh
Judges: Jeevan Reddy, B P J
21 November, 1994·The Judgment of the Court was delivered by B.P. JEEVAN REDDY, J.- Leave granted.2. Heard the counsel for both the parties.3. Respondent Phool Singh filed a declaration of his agricultural holding as required by and under the U.R Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960. After an appropriate ...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Gujrat vs C.G. Raiyani
Judges: Ramaswamy, K
21 November, 1994·1. Delay condoned.2. Leave granted.3. The admitted facts are that the respondent was appointed on ad hoc basis on 20-5-1969 as a Junior Engineer in Junagadh District Panchayat. Thereafter the Panchayat Services Selection Board was constituted to recruit the candidates for regular appointment. The Bo...
Supreme Court Of India
R.C.Sood vs High Court Of Rajasthan
Judges: J S Verma, K S Paripoornan
21 November, 1994·JUDGMENT 1994 SUPPL. (5) SCR 605 The Order of the Court was delivered:The Petitioner-R.C. Sood is a member of Higher Judicial Service in the State of Rajasthan and is a senior District and Sessions Judge. The petitioner was posted as Registrar of the Rajasthan High Court from 1.7.1989 to 1.2.1994; a...
Supreme Court Of India
Achan Rizvi (1) vs State Of U. P
Judges:
20 November, 1994·1. We have heard learned counsel on both sides on I.A. No. 5 (In Contempt Petition No. 97 of 1992 in W.P. (C) No. 977 of 1991).2. Shri Venugopal submitted that the State Government is second to none in its anxiety to ensure the enforcement of the orders of this Court. He stated that as there are ong...
Supreme Court Of India
P.N. Krishna Lal And Ors. Etc. Etc vs Govt. Of Kerala And Anr. Etc. Etc
Judges: K Ramaswamy, N Venkatachala
17 November, 1994·JUDGMENT 1994 SUPPL. (5) SCR 526 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by K. RAMASWAMY, J. Leave granted in S.L. Ps. No. 10248, 9079, 13769/94 and S.L.P. No.................. (CC No. 25558/94).A Division Bench of the Kerala High Court, by its common judgment dated December 10, 1993 in O.P. No. 463...
Supreme Court Of India
Asstt. Collector Of Estate Duty ... vs V. Devaki Ammal, Madras
Judges: S P Bharucha, S C Sen, K S Paripoornan
17 November, 1994·JUDGMENT 1994 SUPPL. (5) SCR 573 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by BHARUCHA, J. In PL S. RM. Ramanathan Chettiar v. Asstt. Controller of Estate Duty, Coimbatore, 76 ITR 402, a Division Bench of the Madras High Court, upon a writ petition, held that Section 34(I)(c) of the Estate Duty Act, 1...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.