L. Vasantha Kumari vs Balammal and Ors
Judges: Ramaswamy, K
30 November, 1994·ORDER This appeal raises question of law of general importance. Though the respondents were successful all through, they are now losing the battle in this Court. The property initially belonged to one Subramonian Pillai. By the sale-deed dated October 5,1955, Subramonian Pillai sold the property in ...
Supreme Court Of India
Mathevan Padmanabhan @ Ponnan ... vs Parmeshwaran Thampi And Ors
Judges: K Ramaswamy, N Venkatachala
30 November, 1994·JUDGMENT 1994 SUPPL. (6) SCR 208 The following Order of the Court was delivered :-This appeal by special leave arises from the judgment of the Division Bench of the Kerala High Court in A.S. No. 45 of 1975, dated February 1, 1984.The respondents laid the suit before the Principal Sub-ordinate Judge,...
Supreme Court Of India
Assam Forest Products (P.) Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax
Judges: B J Reddy, S Majmudar
30 November, 1994·JUDGMENT B.P. Jeevan Reddy, J.1. In view of the decision of this Court in Phool Chand Bajrang Lal v. ITO , the plea raised herein by the assessee does not merit consideration. In view of the said decision, question No. 1 has necessarily to be answered against the assessee and in favour of the Revenu...
Supreme Court Of India
Karsan Ambubhai Sindhav vs State Of Gujarat
Judges: Ramaswamy, K
30 November, 1994·1. This appeal by special leave arises from the judgment of the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad in LPA No. 32 of 1980, dated 10-9-198 1.2. Section 6(3-B) of the Gujarat Agricultural Lands Ceiling Act, 1960 defines 'family' as: "Where a family or a joint family consist of more than five members co...
Supreme Court Of India
Santram Paper Mills Nadiad vs Collector Of Central Excise, ...
Judges: B J Reddy, S Majmudar
30 November, 1994·1. The dispute in this appeal is whether the product manufactured by the appellant is wrapping/packing paper or millboard. We are concerned herein with the period 1980-81. For this period, the appellant filed a classification list treating the said product as wrapping/packing paper. It was approved....
Supreme Court Of India
Kuldip Mahaton And Others vs Bhulan Mahato And Others
Judges: Ramaswamy, K
30 November, 1994·1.One Upasi Mahato is the common ancestor. He had four sons, out of them Mohit Mahato and Chaturi are his first and third sons. Fargudi and Sukan pre-deceased him leaving no heirs. Therefore, the question of their genealogy does not arise. Mohit Mahato had two sons, namely, Bigu and Bihari. Bigu die...
Supreme Court Of India
L.Vasant Kumari vs Balammal
Judges: Ramaswamy, K
30 November, 1994·1.This appeal raises question of law of general importance. Though the respondents were successful all through, they are now losing the battle in this Court. The property initially belonged to one Subramonian Pillai. By the sale deed dated 5-10-1955, Subramonian Pillai sold the property in question ...
Supreme Court Of India
Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. vs Prabhat Chandra Mallick
Judges: B J Reddy, S C Sen
30 November, 1994·JUDGMENT ,B.P.Jeevan Reddy J.1. Leave granted. Heard counsel for both the parties.2. Pursuant to the disciplinary enquiry held against the respondent, he was dismissed from service by an order dated January 12, 1982 by the Welfare Commissioner (Special Grade) Coal Mines Welfare Organisation, Dhanbad...
Supreme Court Of India
Talrochan Singh and Anr vs The State Of Punjab and Ors
Judges: Ramaswamy, K
29 November, 1994·1. Notification under s.4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short 'the Act') was published in the State Gazette on March 1, 1974 acquiring a total extent of 881 acres of land for planned development of the municipality. The Land Acquisition Collector in his award dated March 31, 1976 determi...
Supreme Court Of India
Porcelain Electrical Mfg. Co. vs Collector Of Central Excise, New ...
Judges: R Sahai, K Paripoornan
29 November, 1994·1. The question that arises for consideration in these appeals directed against the order of Customs, Excise & Gold. (Control) Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi is whether the Tribunal was justified in rejecting the claim for refund for the period which was beyond six months from the date the duty was p...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.