Steel Authority Of India Ltd. vs Presiding Officer And Anr.
Judges: A Ahmadi, Y Dayal
05 May, 1994·ORDER A.M. Ahmadi, J.1. Special leave granted.2. Heard counsel on both sides.3. We find that there is considerable force in the grievance of the appellant that the appellant has been made to pay for the lethargy of the respondent-employee. The facts reveal that to avoid being apprehended by the poli...
Supreme Court Of India
Patna University vs Awadh Kishore Pd. Yadav
Judges: Singh N P J
05 May, 1994·The Judgment of the Court was delivered by N.P. SINGH, J.- The different Universities in the State of Bihar and the Bihar State University (Constituent Colleges) Service Commission (hereinafter referred to as 'the Commission') have filed these appeals for setting aside a judgment of the High Court, ...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of M.P vs L.P. Tiwari
Judges: Ramaswamy, K
05 May, 1994·1. Delay condoned. Leave granted.2. The appellant had contemplated disciplinary proceedings against the respondent and considered it expedient to keep the respondent under suspension pending the said proceedings. By proceeding dated 24-4-1990, the respondent was suspended and it was served on him on...
Supreme Court Of India
Commissioner, Food And Civil ... vs Prakash C. Saxena
Judges: Ramaswamy, K
05 May, 1994·1. Delay condoned. Leave granted.2. Heard counsel for the parties. Respondent 1, while was working as Senior Inspector, District Supply Office, Lucknow, his services were terminated by proceedings dated 14-7-1965 : "The services of Shri Prakash Chandra Saxena, Senior Inspector, District Supply Offic...
Supreme Court Of India
Balkar Singh And Another vs State Of Punjab
Judges: K J Reddy, Y Dayal
04 May, 1994·1. These appeals arise out of the judgment of the High Court of Punjab & Haryana and they are filed by original accused nos. 1 to 5. All of them were convicted by the trial court under Sections 148, 449, 302, 302/149, 326 and 326/149 I.P.C. The appeals preferred by them were dismissed by the High Co...
Supreme Court Of India
Umesh Kumar Nagpal vs State Of Haryana (Sawant, J.)
Judges: Sawant, P B
04 May, 1994·The Judgment of the Court was delivered by SAWANT, J.- These two petitions are directed against the decision dated 18-12-1992 of the Division Bench of the Punjab & Haryana High Court in Letters Patent Appeal No. 734 of 1992 and CWP No. 6357 of 1992. Since they raise a point of considerable importanc...
Supreme Court Of India
Jay Laxmi Salt Words (P) Ltd vs State Of Gujarat
Judges: Sahai, R M J
04 May, 1994·The Judgment of the Court was delivered by JAY LAKSHMI SALT WORKS (P) LTD. (Sahai, J.) R.M. SAHAI, J.- This appeal by grant of certificate under Article 133(1)(a) of the Constitution of India by the High Court of Gujarat raises substantial question of law about applicability of the period of limitat...
Supreme Court Of India
Shiv Kumar And Ors. vs State Of Haryana And Ors.
Judges: K Singh, B Hansaria
04 May, 1994·1. Leave granted. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.2. This Court- had been approached by filing the connected SLP by one Shiv Kumar, DP Singh and DH. Wood head Ltd., Employees' Union through Shiv Kumar, its Joint Secretary. An application has, however, been filed, registered as LA. 3/94, in whi...
Supreme Court Of India
S.P. Vaithianathan vs K. Shanmuganathan
Judges: Ahmadi, A M J
04 May, 1994·1. We need not dilate upon the previous history of this case. Suffice to state that on 6-4-1994 when the appeals had come up for hearing, this Court directed the respondents to produce the record and also a responsible officer to file an affidavit whether the disputed land is still needed for a publ...
Supreme Court Of India
K. Periasami vs Sub-Tehsildar (Land ...
Judges: Ramaswamy, K
04 May, 1994·1. By a notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 published in the Tamil Nadu Gazette on 7-3-1973 a large extent of lands including Survey No. 11/4 and 49/7 in Thathanai Village, near Madurai were proposed to be acquired for a Housing Scheme. The Land Acquisition Officer dete...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.