Mohd.Quaramuddin vs State Of A.P
Judges: Ahmadi, A M J
10 May, 1994·1. The short question which is required to beconsidered is whether the court below was right in taking the view that the suit filed by the deceased government servant was barred by limitation, having been filed three years after the date of dismissal. The order of dismissal was passed on 24-7-1967. ...
Supreme Court Of India
Union Of India vs Yogendra Singh
Judges: Bharucha S P J
10 May, 1994·The Judgment of the Court was delivered by BHARUCHA, J.- Delay condoned. Leave granted.2. The respondent applied to the appellants' Railway Recruitment Board for the post of Health Inspector pursuant to an employment notice dated 22-9-1990. The employment notice prescribed that the educational quali...
Supreme Court Of India
J.K. Synthetics Ltd vs Commercial Taxes Officer
Judges: Venkatachalliah, M N Cj, Ahmadi, A M J, Verma, Jagdish Saran J, Ray, G N J, Bharucha S P J
09 May, 1994·The Judgment of the Court delivered by AHAMADI, J.--These appeals by special leave are directed against certain assessment order made by the Commercial Taxes Officer relating to the Assessment Years 1975-76, 1976-77 and 1977-78 under the Rajasthan Sales 280 Tax Act, 1954 (hereinafter called 'the Act...
Supreme Court Of India
J.K.Synthetics Ltd vs Commercial Taxes Officer
Judges: M N Venkatachalliah Cji, A M Ahmadi, Jagdish Saran Verma, G N Ray, S P Bharucha
09 May, 1994·JUDGMENT Delivered by A.M. Ahmadi, J AHAMADI, J.These appeals by special leave are directed against certain assessment order made by the Commercial Taxes Officer relating to the Assessment Years 1975-76, 1976-77 and 1977-78 under the Rajasthan Sales 280 Tax Act, 1954 (hereinafter called 'the Act') a...
Supreme Court Of India
G. Satyanarayana Reddy vs State Of A.P. (Hansria,J.)
Judges: Hansaria B L J
09 May, 1994·The Judgment of the Court was delivered by HANSARIA, J.- January 30, which is an inauspicious day for the people of India, turned an ominous day for the family of Krishnareddy also as it was on that day of the year 1980 at about noon that he met his end in Annapurna Hotel belonging to PW 4. Krishnar...
Supreme Court Of India
C.I.T vs Kamalini Khatau
Judges: Bharucha S P J
09 May, 1994·The Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.P. BHARUCHA, J.- An interesting question arises in these appeals. It is this : Has the Revenue an option to assess and recover tax from either the trustees or the beneficiaries of a discretionary trust when the income thereof is distributed and received b...
Supreme Court Of India
Kudremukh Iron Ore Co. Ltd. vs Fair Growth Financial Services ...
Judges: M Venkatachaliah, S Mohan
06 May, 1994·1. M/s. Kudremukh Iron Ore Company Limited, a Government company, prefers this appeal under Section 10 of the Special Court [Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities] Act, 1992 (for short 'the Act') against the order dated 26th August, 1993 made by the Special Court at Bombay in Misc...
Supreme Court Of India
Kudremukh Iron Ore Co vs Fairgrowth Financial Services
Judges: Venkatachalliah, M N Cj
06 May, 1994·The Judgment of the Court was delivered by VENKATACHALIAH, C.J.- M/s Kudremukh Iron Ore Company Limited, a Government Company, prefers this appeal under Section 10 of the Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992 (for short 'the Act') against the order dated ...
Supreme Court Of India
S. Satyapal Reddy vs Govt. Of A.P
Judges: Ramaswamy, K
06 May, 1994·1. Leave granted.2.The A.P. Public Service Commission had issued an advertisement on 20-4-1992 calling for applications for recruitment to the posts of Assistant Motor Vehicles Inspectors in Andhra Pradesh Transport Subordinate Service. Though appellants had applied for the said posts, since they po...
Supreme Court Of India
G.B. Pant Agr. and Tech. University vs Kesho Ram
Judges: Ramaswamy, K
05 May, 1994·1. Leave granted.2. We have heard the learned counsel on both sides. The respondent was appointed as Assistant Block Superintendent on 30-11-1972, subject to the terms of the contract. Two of the terms, relevant for the purpose of this case, are that his service was liable to be terminated with one ...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.