Kartar Singh vs Harbans Kaur
Judges: Ramaswamy, K
21 January, 1994·1. Leave granted.2. The appellant is the defendant. Smt Harbans Kaur - respondent executed the sale deed on 19-4-1961, in favour of the appellant of alienating the lands on her behalf and on behalf of her minor son, Kulwant Singh. Kulwant Singh, on attaining majority, filed Case No. 21 of 1975 on 14...
Supreme Court Of India
Quamarul Islam vs S K Kanta And Ors
Judges: S Ratnavel Pandian, R M Sahai, A S Anand
21 January, 1994·PETITIONER:ANAND S. BIJI Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF KERALA AND ORS. DATE OF JUDGMENT22/04/1993 BENCH:JEEVAN REDDY, B.P. (J) BENCH:JEEVAN REDDY, B.P. (J) VENKATACHALA N. (J) CITATION:1993 SCR (3) 337 1993 SCC (3) 80 JT 1993 (3) 130 1993 SCALE (2)586 ACT:% Constitution of India, 1950:Articles 136...
Supreme Court Of India
Quamarul Islam vs S K Kanta And Ors
Judges: S Ratnavel Pandian, R M Sahai, A S Anand
21 January, 1994·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 4211 of 1992 PETITIONER:QUAMARUL ISLAM RESPONDENT:S.K. KANTA AND ORS.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 21/01/1994 BENCH:S. RATNAVEL PANDIAN & R,M. SAHAI & DR. A.S. ANAND JUDGMENT:JUDGMENT 1994(1)SCR 210 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by1. DR. ANAND, J. On 25th of September 1992, the...
Supreme Court Of India
Madras Fertilizers Ltd. vs Assistant Collector Of Central ...
Judges: B J Reddy, B Hansaria
20 January, 1994·JUDGMENT B. P. Jeevan Reddy, J.1. Tariff Item 14HH of the First Schedule to the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944 levied duty on fertilizers at the rate of 15 per cent ad valorem. The Tariff item read as follows:Item No. 14HH - Fertilisers-------------------------------------------------------------...
Supreme Court Of India
Madras Fertilizers Ltd vs Assistant C.C.E
Judges: Jeevan Reddy, B P J
20 January, 1994·The Judgment of the Court was delivered by B.P. JEEVAN REDDY, J.- Tariff Item 14-HH of the First Schedule to the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 levied duty on fertilizers at the rate of 15 per cent ad valorem. The tariff item read as follows:ITEM No. 14-HH FERTILIZERS Item No. Description Rate o...
Supreme Court Of India
Bimla Devi vs State Of Bihar
Judges: Faizan Uddin J
20 January, 1994·The Judgment of the Court was delivered by FAIZANUDDIN, J.- This petition arises out of a complaint having been made by one Smt Bimla Devi complaining that Shri P. Kumar, Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad granted bail to the accused-Respondent 4, involved in a case under Sections 302/34 of the Penal Code...
Supreme Court Of India
Smt. Bhagwanti Devi And Anr vs State Of Haryana And Anr
Judges: K Ramaswamy, N Venkatachala
19 January, 1994·JUDGMENT 1994(1) SCR 180 The following Order of the Court was delivered :1. These appeals are being disposed of by a common judgment since a common question of law arises, the parties are inter-related and the dispute relates to the same land. These appeals arise from the judgment of the Punjab & Ha...
Supreme Court Of India
Surinder Nath Dewan vs State Of Haryana And Ors
Judges: K Ramaswamy, N Venkatachala
19 January, 1994·JUDGMENT 1994(1) SCR 186 The following Order of the Court was delivered:1. The appellant was declared to have 15 standard acres as surplus land by an order of the Collector dated December 12, 1960 made under the provisions of the East Punjab Security of Land Tenures Act, 1953, which had come into fo...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Haryana vs Hari Ram Yadav
Judges: Agrawal, S C J
19 January, 1994·The Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.C. AGRAWAL, J.- This appeal is directed against the order dated October 12, 1992 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench (hereinafter referred to as 'the tribunal'). The question that arises for consideration is whether the order d...
Supreme Court Of India
Administration Of The National ... vs Prem Singh
Judges: S Mohan, M Mukherjee
19 January, 1994·1. This appeal arises against the judgment of the High Court of Delhi rendered in the Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 637/92 dated 1th February, 1993. In and by the said judgment, 40 the High Court has chosen to interfere at the pre-detention stage. Against the respondent the order of detention alone has b...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.