The Papnasam Labour Union vs Madura Coats Ltd. And Anr
Judges: Ray, G N J
08 December, 1994·G.N. RAY, J.:1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 9th April, 1981 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Madras in Writ Petition No. 1119 of 1977. The said writ petition was moved by the respondent No. 1 Madura Coats Ltd., for a declaration that Section 25-M of the Industria...
Supreme Court Of India
Ashok Kumar Jain And Others vs The State Of Bihar And Others
Judges: Ray, G N J
08 December, 1994·G.N.RAY, J.:1. The appellants in these criminal appeals arc Chairman, Managing Director and other senior officials in the management of the Rohtas Industries Limited a company registered under the Indian Companies Act and engaged in the manufacture and sale of variety of products namely cement, vana...
Supreme Court Of India
Papnasam Labour Union vs Madura Coats Ltd
Judges: Ray, G N J
08 December, 1994·The Judgment of the Court was delivered by G.N. RAY, J.- This appeal is directed against the order dated 9-4-1981 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Madras in Writ Petition No. 11 19 of 1977. The said writ petition was moved by Respondent 1 Madura Coats Ltd., for a declaration that Se...
Supreme Court Of India
Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. vs E. Merck (India)
Judges: J Verma, S Bharucha
08 December, 1994·1. The respondent-Company manufactures certain medicines for which it was liable to pay excise duty. There was a dispute about the rate at which excise duty was payable by it on its products. The dispute came to be resolved finally by an order of Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal...
Supreme Court Of India
Ashok Kumar Jain vs State Of Bihar
Judges: Ray, G N J
08 December, 1994·The Judgment of the Court was delivered by G.N. RAY, J.- The appellants in these criminal appeals are Chairman, Managing Director and other senior officials in the Management of Rohtas Industries Limited, a Company registered under the Indian Companies Act and engaged in the manufacture and sale of ...
Supreme Court Of India
Shamsher Singh Bedi vs High Court Of Punjab And Haryana
Judges: M Punchhi, K J Reddy
08 December, 1994·JUDGMENT M.M. Punchhi, J.1. The contemnor, Shri Shamsher Singh Bedi, Advocate, Anandpur Sahib District Ropar, Punjab, is the appellant in this appeal filed under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 against the judgment and order of a Division Bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court con...
Supreme Court Of India
Madhya Pradesh Hasta Shilpa Vikas ... vs Devendra Kumar Jain and Ors
Judges: Faizan Uddin J
07 December, 1994·FAIZAN UDDIN, J.:1. Leave granted.2. The appellant is a Government Company within the meaning of Section 617 of the Companies Act which is controlled and owned by the State Government and a subsidiary company of M.P. Laghu Udhyog Nigam Limited which is carrying on business activities of development ...
Supreme Court Of India
Union Of India and Ors vs Brg. P.K. Dutta (Retd.)
Judges: Jeevan Reddy, B P J
07 December, 1994·1. Leave granted.2. Heard learned Additional Solicitor General for the appellant-Union of India and the learned counsel for the re- spondent. The appeal is preferred against the judgment of the Delhi High Court allowing the writ petition filed by the respondent and directing the Union of India to di...
Supreme Court Of India
Radhakrishanan Nair and Ors vs State Of Kerala
Judges: Reddy, K Jayachandra J
07 December, 1994·K. JAYACHANDRA REDDY, J.1. These three appeals under Section (2) of the Supreme Court (Enlargement of Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Act read with Section 379 Cr.P.C. are filed against the judgment of the High Court of Kerala. Original accused nos. 2 to 5 and 7 to 15 are the appellants herein. Alt...
Supreme Court Of India
Anirudh Pandey vs The Bihar State Road Transport ...
Judges: Agrawal, S C J
07 December, 1994·1. Leave granted.2. We have heard learned counsel for the parties.3. Anirudh Pandey, the appellant herein, was employed with the Bihar State Road Transport Corporation,respondent No.1 [hereinafter referred to as 'the Corporation'. While he was thus employed, he was allotted House No. 32772-2 on Road...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.