U. P. State Coop. Land Development ... vs Taz Mulk Ansari
Judges: Sawant, P B
11 October, 1993·1. Leave granted, Heard parties.2. In view of the fact that the workmen were engaged under an agreement for a specified period, their case is covered by the proviso to clause (a) of Section 6-N of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. In view of this, it is unnecessary to go into the question as t...
Supreme Court Of India
Sh. Gunnaseelam vs State Of Tamil Nadu
Judges: S Pandian, R Sahai
11 October, 1993·1. Leave granted.2. This appeal is preferred against the order of the High Court of Madras dated 12-4-1991 made in Cr. M.P. No. 2994 of 1991 whereby the High Court dismissed the petition filed by the petitioner praying to set aside the Order passed by the Judicial Magistrate No. 1, Attur, Salem Dist...
Supreme Court Of India
Anil Kumar Sawhney vs Gulshan Rai
Judges: K Singh, Y Dayal
11 October, 1993·JUDGMENT Kuldip Singh, J.1. Leave granted.2. Anil Kumar Sawhney filed three complaints before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karnal alleging that Gulshan Rai, the accused therein, had committed an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Act, 1988 (for short the Act). The ...
Supreme Court Of India
Bakshish Singh vs Darshan Engineering Works
Judges: Sawant, P B
11 October, 1993·The Judgment of the Court was delivered by SAWANT, J.- These two appeals one by the Union of India and the other by the aggrieved employee are directed against the decision dated March 24, 1983 of the Punjab and Haryana High Court whereby the High Court has struck down Section 4(1)(b) of the Payment...
Supreme Court Of India
Rosiline George vs Union Of India
Judges: Kuldip Singh J
11 October, 1993·The Judgment of the Court was delivered by KULDIP SINGH, J.- Leave granted in both the special leave petitions.2. George Kutty Kuncheria, an Indian national, is wanted in the United States of America to stand trial for violation of Federal Fraud Statutes and related offenses. The Embassy of the Unit...
Supreme Court Of India
Mukund Engineering Works vs Bansi Purshottam
Judges: Punchhi, M M
11 October, 1993·1. Leave granted.+ Arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 2981-82 of 1993 7262.Heard learned counsel for the parties. In view of the finding recorded by the labour court as also by the High Court, the misconduct of the respondent workman stood proved. In this situation of gravity it becomes ununderstandable as...
Supreme Court Of India
Election Commissioner Of India vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors.
Judges: M V I, S Agrawal, A Anand
10 October, 1993·1. Supplementary affidavit of the Election Commission presented in Court is taken on record. This shall be read as part of I.A. No.2. We have heard Shri R.K. Garg, learned Senior counsel for the Election Commission and the learned Attorney General for the Union of India. Some of the learned Advocate...
Supreme Court Of India
Pirthi vs State Of Haryana
Judges: Reddy, K Jayachandra J
08 October, 1993·The Judgment of the Court was delivered by K. JAYACHANDRA REDDY, J.- Special leave granted.2. The appellant was tried for an offence punishable under Section 302 IPC and has been ultimately found guilty under Section 304 Part II IPC and sentenced to undergo four years' RI and to pay a fine of Rs 10,...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Bihar vs Secretariat Asstt. Successful ...
Judges: Anand, A S J
08 October, 1993·The Judgment of the Court was delivered by DR A.S. ANAND, J.- Leave granted.2. The Bihar State Subordinate Services Selection Board (hereinafter referred to as the 'Board') issued advertisement No. 11 of 1985 inviting applications from unemployed Graduates for appointment to the post of Assistants i...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of W.B. And Ors. vs Prasenjit Dutta
Judges: M Punchhi, B J Reddy
08 October, 1993·ORDER M.M. Punchhi, J.1. Leave granted.2. This is an appeal by the State of West Bengal and its officers against the judgment and order dated November 18, 1992 passed by a Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court in FMAT No. 2977 of 1992 confirming the decision of the Single Judge passed in CR No.7...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.