Umesh Chandra Misra vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors.
Judges: P Sawant, G Ray
14 October, 1992·JUDGMENT P.B. Sawant, J.1. Leave granted.2. The appellant was working in the Northern Railway as Assistant Station Master at Bareily drawing at the relevant time basic salary of Rs. 404/- in the pay-scale of Fs.330-560/ -. On 9.5.1974, he was arrested in connection with May 1974 Railway Strike. On 1...
Supreme Court Of India
Polaki Motors And Ors. vs State Of Orissa And Ors.
Judges: S Ranganathan, V Ramaswamy, B J Reddy
14 October, 1992·JUDGMENT V. Ramaswami, J.1. In the Writ Petitions filed in the year 1983 the constitutional validity of the Orissa Additional Sales Tax (Amendment and Validation) Ordinance, 1983 is questioned. In Writ Petition Nos. 207 to 211 of 1984 and 1302 of 1986 the constitutional validity of the Orissa Additi...
Supreme Court Of India
Steel Rolling Mills Of Bengal Ltd. vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors.
Judges: S Ranganathan, V Ramaswamy, B J Reddy
14 October, 1992·JUDGMENT V. Ramaswami, J.1. These appeals under Section 3S-L of the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1962 are filed against the orders of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (CEGAT) in order Nos. 10 to 55/84-B dated 5.1.1984. The appellants at all material times were car...
Supreme Court Of India
Smt. Hawabi Sayed Arif Sayed Hanif vs L. Hmingliana And Others
Judges: S Pandian, R Sahai
14 October, 1992·ORDER S. Ratnavel Pandian, J.1. Leave granted in SLP.2. The above appeal and the Writ Petition are filed by Smt. Hawabi Sayed Arif Sayed Hanif, who is the wife of the detenu, Sayed Arif Sayed Hanif, assailing the validity of the order of detention dated 23.10.90 passed against the detenu, by the fir...
Supreme Court Of India
Manicklal Mukherjee (Kali Durga ... vs Commissioner Of Sanchaita ...
Judges: S Ranganathan, V Ramaswamy, Y Dayal
14 October, 1992·ORDER V. Ramaswami, J.1. The respondent-Commissioner Sanchaita Invest' meats in exercise of the powers vested in him under orders of this Court attached the entire first floor of premises No. 158, Dharamtolla Street, Calcutta along with all appurtenants attached thereto under an order of attachment ...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Madhya Pradesh And ... vs Syed Naseem Zahir And Others
Judges: K Singh, N Kasliwal, B J Reddy
13 October, 1992·ORDER Kuldip Singh, J.1. Special leave granted.2. Syed Naseem Zahir (Syed) joined service in the Irrigation Department of the State of Madhya Pradesh as Assistant Engineer on August 26, 1953. He was promoted as executive Engineer in 1962. He was further promoted to the post of Superintending Enginee...
Supreme Court Of India
Everest Co-Owners, A.B.C. vs M.P. State Ware Housing ...
Judges: S Ranganathan, B J Reddy
13 October, 1992·ORDER S. Ranganathan, J.1. Special leave is granted and the appeals are disposed of after hearing both counsel.2. The appeal has been preferred from an order of a learned Single Judge of the Madhya Pradesh High Court dated 13.1.1992 by which the learned Judge set aside an order passed by the Distric...
Supreme Court Of India
State Bank Of India And Others vs D.C. Aggarwal And Another
Judges: S Pandian, R Sahai
13 October, 1992·ORDER R.M. Sahai, J.1. Can Disciplinary Authority while imposing punishment, major or minor, act on material which is neither supplied nor shown to the delinquent is the only issue, of substance, which arises for consideration in this appeal, filed by the State Bank of India against the judgment and...
Supreme Court Of India
Managing Director, Orissa ... vs Shyam Sundar Jena And Ors.
Judges: K Singh, P Sawant
13 October, 1992·1. These appeals are directed against the judgment of a Division Bench of the Orissa High Court. The High Court allowed the writ petition of the respondents-workmen in the following terms:We would accordingly direct that the petitioners shall be paid salary and allowances as are paid to their counte...
Supreme Court Of India
Food Corporation Of India vs Jagdish Chandra Saha
Judges: S Ranganathan, V Ramaswamy, B J Reddy
13 October, 1992·1. Leave granted.2. The award in this case did not give any reasons. When the matter went to the Subordinate Judge he set aside the award on the ground that the order appointing the arbitrator had contained a specific direction that where the amount of claim in dispute is Rs. 25,000/-or above, the a...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.