Supreme Court Decisions/Judgements Directory

Judges: A M Ahmadi, M M Punchhi And K Ramaswamy, Jj Act Indian Administrative Service Regulation Of Seniority First Amendment Rules 1989 Rule 3 3 Ii Seniority Of Promotees Direct Recruits Assigning Year Of Allotment Procedure Legislative Intention What Is Junior Officer Promoted On Merit Superseding Seniors Year Of Allotment Of Such Officer Fixation Of Interpretation Of Statutes I A S Regulation Of Seniority First Amendment Rules, 1989 Rule 3 3 Ii Proviso Construction Whether Prospective In Operation Legislative Intention What Is Constitution Of India 1950 Articles 14 16 And Rule 3 3 Ii Proviso Of I A S Regulation Of Seniority First Amendment Rules 1989 Constitutional Validity Of Whether Inconsistent With Section 3 La Of The All India Services Act, 1957 All India Services Act, 1951 Section 3 1 A Rules Made Under Rule 3 3 Ii, Proviso Of The First Amendment Rules, 1989 Consultation Object, Importance And Nature Of Failure To Consult All Stares And Union Territories Whether Proviso To Rule 3 3 Unconstitutional Headnote On 19 1 1984, The Association Petitioner No 1 In W P C No 499 Of 1991 Requested The Union Government Respondent To Remove The Disparity Prevailing In Different States Of Promotional Avenues From State Civil Services To All India Administrative Service A Committee Of Senior Secretaries, Constituted By The Union Government, Recommended An Equitable Principle Of Comparable Seniority From Different States For Promotion To The Indian Administrative Service The I A S Regulation Of Seniority Rules, 1987 Came Into Force With Effect From 6 11 1987, Repealing The Old Rules In A Circular Dated 9 9 1986 Issued By The Respondent Union Government Directed The State Governments To Give Weightage Over And Above Four Years The Assignment Of Year Of Allotment As Per The Existing Rules, Namely, Four Years For The First 12 Years State Service With Additional Weightage One Year For Every Two To The Years Completed Service Subject To A Maximum Of Five Years Union Government Amended And Published The New Seniority Rules, 1987, After Considering The Suggestions From The State Governments The First Amendment Rules Was Published In The Gazette Of India On 32 1989 Which Was Give

11 November, 1992·PETITIONER:AHMEDABAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Vs. RESPONDENT:DILBAGSINGH BALWANTSINGH AND ORS. DATE OF JUDGMENT24/03/1992 BENCH:REDDY, K. JAYACHANDRA (J) BENCH:REDDY, K. JAYACHANDRA (J) PANDIAN, S.R. (J) CITATION:1992 SCR (2) 322 1992 SCC Supl. (2) 630 JT 1992 (2) 363 1992 SCALE (1)721 ACT:Ahmed...

Judges: A M Ahmadi, M M Punchhi And K Ramaswamy, Jj Act Indian Administrative Service Regulation Of Seniority First Amendment Rules 1989 Rule 3 3 Ii Seniority Of Promotees Direct Recruits Assigning Year Of Allotment Procedure Legislative Intention What Is Junior Officer Promoted On Merit Superseding Seniors Year Of Allotment Of Such Officer Fixation Of Interpretation Of Statutes I A S Regulation Of Seniority First Amendment Rules, 1989 Rule 3 3 Ii Proviso Construction Whether Prospective In Operation Legislative Intention What Is Constitution Of India 1950 Articles 14 16 And Rule 3 3 Ii Proviso Of I A S Regulation Of Seniority First Amendment Rules 1989 Constitutional Validity Of Whether Inconsistent With Section 3 La Of The All India Services Act, 1957 All India Services Act, 1951 Section 3 1 A Rules Made Under Rule 3 3 Ii, Proviso Of The First Amendment Rules, 1989 Consultation Object, Importance And Nature Of Failure To Consult All Stares And Union Territories Whether Proviso To Rule 3 3 Unconstitutional Headnote On 19 1 1984, The Association Petitioner No 1 In W P C No 499 Of 1991 Requested The Union Government Respondent To Remove The Disparity Prevailing In Different States Of Promotional Avenues From State Civil Services To All India Administrative Service A Committee Of Senior Secretaries, Constituted By The Union Government, Recommended An Equitable Principle Of Comparable Seniority From Different States For Promotion To The Indian Administrative Service The I A S Regulation Of Seniority Rules, 1987 Came Into Force With Effect From 6 11 1987, Repealing The Old Rules In A Circular Dated 9 9 1986 Issued By The Respondent Union Government Directed The State Governments To Give Weightage Over And Above Four Years The Assignment Of Year Of Allotment As Per The Existing Rules, Namely, Four Years For The First 12 Years State Service With Additional Weightage One Year For Every Two To The Years Completed Service Subject To A Maximum Of Five Years Union Government Amended And Published The New Seniority Rules, 1987, After Considering The Suggestions From The State Governments The First Amendment Rules Was Published In The Gazette Of India On 32 1989 Which Was Give

11 November, 1992·PETITIONER:RAKESH RANJAN VERMA AND ORS. ETC. ETC.Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. ETC. ETC. DATE OF JUDGMENT10/04/1992 BENCH:KASLIWAL, N.M. (J) BENCH:KASLIWAL, N.M. (J) SAHAI, R.M. (J) CITATION:1992 AIR 1348 1992 SCR (2) 516 1992 SCC Supl. (2) 343 JT 1992 (4) 155 1992 SCALE (2)817 ACT:Ele...

Judges: A M Ahmadi, M M Punchhi And K Ramaswamy, Jj Act Indian Administrative Service Regulation Of Seniority First Amendment Rules 1989 Rule 3 3 Ii Seniority Of Promotees Direct Recruits Assigning Year Of Allotment Procedure Legislative Intention What Is Junior Officer Promoted On Merit Superseding Seniors Year Of Allotment Of Such Officer Fixation Of Interpretation Of Statutes I A S Regulation Of Seniority First Amendment Rules, 1989 Rule 3 3 Ii Proviso Construction Whether Prospective In Operation Legislative Intention What Is Constitution Of India 1950 Articles 14 16 And Rule 3 3 Ii Proviso Of I A S Regulation Of Seniority First Amendment Rules 1989 Constitutional Validity Of Whether Inconsistent With Section 3 La Of The All India Services Act, 1957 All India Services Act, 1951 Section 3 1 A Rules Made Under Rule 3 3 Ii, Proviso Of The First Amendment Rules, 1989 Consultation Object, Importance And Nature Of Failure To Consult All Stares And Union Territories Whether Proviso To Rule 3 3 Unconstitutional Headnote On 19 1 1984, The Association Petitioner No 1 In W P C No 499 Of 1991 Requested The Union Government Respondent To Remove The Disparity Prevailing In Different States Of Promotional Avenues From State Civil Services To All India Administrative Service A Committee Of Senior Secretaries, Constituted By The Union Government, Recommended An Equitable Principle Of Comparable Seniority From Different States For Promotion To The Indian Administrative Service The I A S Regulation Of Seniority Rules, 1987 Came Into Force With Effect From 6 11 1987, Repealing The Old Rules In A Circular Dated 9 9 1986 Issued By The Respondent Union Government Directed The State Governments To Give Weightage Over And Above Four Years The Assignment Of Year Of Allotment As Per The Existing Rules, Namely, Four Years For The First 12 Years State Service With Additional Weightage One Year For Every Two To The Years Completed Service Subject To A Maximum Of Five Years Union Government Amended And Published The New Seniority Rules, 1987, After Considering The Suggestions From The State Governments The First Amendment Rules Was Published In The Gazette Of India On 32 1989 Which Was Give

11 November, 1992·PETITIONER:BEED DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-OP BANK LTD. AND ANR Vs. RESPONDENT:JAGANNATH S. SHAHANE AND ORS. DATE OF JUDGMENT13/03/1992 BENCH:KASLIWAL, N.M. (J) BENCH:KASLIWAL, N.M. (J) YOGESHWAR DAYAL (J) CITATION:1992 AIR 1249 1992 SCR (2) 296 1992 SCC (2) 604 JT 1992 (2) 367 1992 SCALE (1)716 AC...

Judges: A M Ahmadi, M M Punchhi And K Ramaswamy, Jj Act Indian Administrative Service Regulation Of Seniority First Amendment Rules 1989 Rule 3 3 Ii Seniority Of Promotees Direct Recruits Assigning Year Of Allotment Procedure Legislative Intention What Is Junior Officer Promoted On Merit Superseding Seniors Year Of Allotment Of Such Officer Fixation Of Interpretation Of Statutes I A S Regulation Of Seniority First Amendment Rules, 1989 Rule 3 3 Ii Proviso Construction Whether Prospective In Operation Legislative Intention What Is Constitution Of India 1950 Articles 14 16 And Rule 3 3 Ii Proviso Of I A S Regulation Of Seniority First Amendment Rules 1989 Constitutional Validity Of Whether Inconsistent With Section 3 La Of The All India Services Act, 1957 All India Services Act, 1951 Section 3 1 A Rules Made Under Rule 3 3 Ii, Proviso Of The First Amendment Rules, 1989 Consultation Object, Importance And Nature Of Failure To Consult All Stares And Union Territories Whether Proviso To Rule 3 3 Unconstitutional Headnote On 19 1 1984, The Association Petitioner No 1 In W P C No 499 Of 1991 Requested The Union Government Respondent To Remove The Disparity Prevailing In Different States Of Promotional Avenues From State Civil Services To All India Administrative Service A Committee Of Senior Secretaries, Constituted By The Union Government, Recommended An Equitable Principle Of Comparable Seniority From Different States For Promotion To The Indian Administrative Service The I A S Regulation Of Seniority Rules, 1987 Came Into Force With Effect From 6 11 1987, Repealing The Old Rules In A Circular Dated 9 9 1986 Issued By The Respondent Union Government Directed The State Governments To Give Weightage Over And Above Four Years The Assignment Of Year Of Allotment As Per The Existing Rules, Namely, Four Years For The First 12 Years State Service With Additional Weightage One Year For Every Two To The Years Completed Service Subject To A Maximum Of Five Years Union Government Amended And Published The New Seniority Rules, 1987, After Considering The Suggestions From The State Governments The First Amendment Rules Was Published In The Gazette Of India On 32 1989 Which Was Give

11 November, 1992·PETITIONER:SRINIVASA THEATRE AND ORS. ETC. ETC.Vs. RESPONDENT:GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU AND ORS. ETC. ETC. DATE OF JUDGMENT12/03/1992 BENCH:JEEVAN REDDY, B.P. (J) BENCH:JEEVAN REDDY, B.P. (J) VENKATACHALLIAH, M.N. (J) CITATION:1992 AIR 999 1992 SCR (2) 164 1992 SCC (2) 643 JT 1992 (2) 312 19...

Judges: A M Ahmadi, M M Punchhi And K Ramaswamy, Jj Act Indian Administrative Service Regulation Of Seniority First Amendment Rules 1989 Rule 3 3 Ii Seniority Of Promotees Direct Recruits Assigning Year Of Allotment Procedure Legislative Intention What Is Junior Officer Promoted On Merit Superseding Seniors Year Of Allotment Of Such Officer Fixation Of Interpretation Of Statutes I A S Regulation Of Seniority First Amendment Rules, 1989 Rule 3 3 Ii Proviso Construction Whether Prospective In Operation Legislative Intention What Is Constitution Of India 1950 Articles 14 16 And Rule 3 3 Ii Proviso Of I A S Regulation Of Seniority First Amendment Rules 1989 Constitutional Validity Of Whether Inconsistent With Section 3 La Of The All India Services Act, 1957 All India Services Act, 1951 Section 3 1 A Rules Made Under Rule 3 3 Ii, Proviso Of The First Amendment Rules, 1989 Consultation Object, Importance And Nature Of Failure To Consult All Stares And Union Territories Whether Proviso To Rule 3 3 Unconstitutional Headnote On 19 1 1984, The Association Petitioner No 1 In W P C No 499 Of 1991 Requested The Union Government Respondent To Remove The Disparity Prevailing In Different States Of Promotional Avenues From State Civil Services To All India Administrative Service A Committee Of Senior Secretaries, Constituted By The Union Government, Recommended An Equitable Principle Of Comparable Seniority From Different States For Promotion To The Indian Administrative Service The I A S Regulation Of Seniority Rules, 1987 Came Into Force With Effect From 6 11 1987, Repealing The Old Rules In A Circular Dated 9 9 1986 Issued By The Respondent Union Government Directed The State Governments To Give Weightage Over And Above Four Years The Assignment Of Year Of Allotment As Per The Existing Rules, Namely, Four Years For The First 12 Years State Service With Additional Weightage One Year For Every Two To The Years Completed Service Subject To A Maximum Of Five Years Union Government Amended And Published The New Seniority Rules, 1987, After Considering The Suggestions From The State Governments The First Amendment Rules Was Published In The Gazette Of India On 32 1989 Which Was Give

11 November, 1992·PETITIONER:NATIONAL POWER TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LTD.Vs. RESPONDENT:CORPORATE EXECUTIVE ASSOCIATION OF NTPC (CEAN)NEW DELHI AND DATE OF JUDGMENT13/03/1992 BENCH:PATNAIK, R.C. (J) BENCH:PATNAIK, R.C. (J) VENKATACHALLIAH, M.N. (J) CITATION:1992 AIR 1425 1992 SCR (2) 234 1992 SCC Supl. (2) 283 JT...

Judges: A M Ahmadi, M M Punchhi And K Ramaswamy, Jj Act Indian Administrative Service Regulation Of Seniority First Amendment Rules 1989 Rule 3 3 Ii Seniority Of Promotees Direct Recruits Assigning Year Of Allotment Procedure Legislative Intention What Is Junior Officer Promoted On Merit Superseding Seniors Year Of Allotment Of Such Officer Fixation Of Interpretation Of Statutes I A S Regulation Of Seniority First Amendment Rules, 1989 Rule 3 3 Ii Proviso Construction Whether Prospective In Operation Legislative Intention What Is Constitution Of India 1950 Articles 14 16 And Rule 3 3 Ii Proviso Of I A S Regulation Of Seniority First Amendment Rules 1989 Constitutional Validity Of Whether Inconsistent With Section 3 La Of The All India Services Act, 1957 All India Services Act, 1951 Section 3 1 A Rules Made Under Rule 3 3 Ii, Proviso Of The First Amendment Rules, 1989 Consultation Object, Importance And Nature Of Failure To Consult All Stares And Union Territories Whether Proviso To Rule 3 3 Unconstitutional Headnote On 19 1 1984, The Association Petitioner No 1 In W P C No 499 Of 1991 Requested The Union Government Respondent To Remove The Disparity Prevailing In Different States Of Promotional Avenues From State Civil Services To All India Administrative Service A Committee Of Senior Secretaries, Constituted By The Union Government, Recommended An Equitable Principle Of Comparable Seniority From Different States For Promotion To The Indian Administrative Service The I A S Regulation Of Seniority Rules, 1987 Came Into Force With Effect From 6 11 1987, Repealing The Old Rules In A Circular Dated 9 9 1986 Issued By The Respondent Union Government Directed The State Governments To Give Weightage Over And Above Four Years The Assignment Of Year Of Allotment As Per The Existing Rules, Namely, Four Years For The First 12 Years State Service With Additional Weightage One Year For Every Two To The Years Completed Service Subject To A Maximum Of Five Years Union Government Amended And Published The New Seniority Rules, 1987, After Considering The Suggestions From The State Governments The First Amendment Rules Was Published In The Gazette Of India On 32 1989 Which Was Give

11 November, 1992·PETITIONER:CHAIRMAN, CANARA BANK, BANGALORE Vs. RESPONDENT:M. S. JASRA AND ORS.DATE OF JUDGMENT06/03/1992 BENCH:VERMA, JAGDISH SARAN (J) BENCH:VERMA, JAGDISH SARAN (J) SHARMA, L.M. (J) YOGESHWAR DAYAL (J) CITATION:1992 AIR 1100 1992 SCR (2) 68 1992 SCC (2) 484 JT 1992 (2) 203 1992 SCALE (1)...

Judges: A M Ahmadi, M M Punchhi And K Ramaswamy, Jj Act Indian Administrative Service Regulation Of Seniority First Amendment Rules 1989 Rule 3 3 Ii Seniority Of Promotees Direct Recruits Assigning Year Of Allotment Procedure Legislative Intention What Is Junior Officer Promoted On Merit Superseding Seniors Year Of Allotment Of Such Officer Fixation Of Interpretation Of Statutes I A S Regulation Of Seniority First Amendment Rules, 1989 Rule 3 3 Ii Proviso Construction Whether Prospective In Operation Legislative Intention What Is Constitution Of India 1950 Articles 14 16 And Rule 3 3 Ii Proviso Of I A S Regulation Of Seniority First Amendment Rules 1989 Constitutional Validity Of Whether Inconsistent With Section 3 La Of The All India Services Act, 1957 All India Services Act, 1951 Section 3 1 A Rules Made Under Rule 3 3 Ii, Proviso Of The First Amendment Rules, 1989 Consultation Object, Importance And Nature Of Failure To Consult All Stares And Union Territories Whether Proviso To Rule 3 3 Unconstitutional Headnote On 19 1 1984, The Association Petitioner No 1 In W P C No 499 Of 1991 Requested The Union Government Respondent To Remove The Disparity Prevailing In Different States Of Promotional Avenues From State Civil Services To All India Administrative Service A Committee Of Senior Secretaries, Constituted By The Union Government, Recommended An Equitable Principle Of Comparable Seniority From Different States For Promotion To The Indian Administrative Service The I A S Regulation Of Seniority Rules, 1987 Came Into Force With Effect From 6 11 1987, Repealing The Old Rules In A Circular Dated 9 9 1986 Issued By The Respondent Union Government Directed The State Governments To Give Weightage Over And Above Four Years The Assignment Of Year Of Allotment As Per The Existing Rules, Namely, Four Years For The First 12 Years State Service With Additional Weightage One Year For Every Two To The Years Completed Service Subject To A Maximum Of Five Years Union Government Amended And Published The New Seniority Rules, 1987, After Considering The Suggestions From The State Governments The First Amendment Rules Was Published In The Gazette Of India On 32 1989 Which Was Give

11 November, 1992·PETITIONER:INDIAN ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICE (S.C.S.) ASSOCIATION, U.P. AND Vs. RESPONDENT:UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. DATE OF JUDGMENT11/11/1992 BENCH:[A.M. AHMADI, M.M. PUNCHHI AND K. RAMASWAMY, JJ.] ACT:Indian Administrative Service (Regulation of Seniority) (First Amendment) Rules 1989:Rule 3(3)(ii) Sen...

Judges: A M Ahmadi, M M Punchhi And K Ramaswamy, Jj Act Indian Administrative Service Regulation Of Seniority First Amendment Rules 1989 Rule 3 3 Ii Seniority Of Promotees Direct Recruits Assigning Year Of Allotment Procedure Legislative Intention What Is Junior Officer Promoted On Merit Superseding Seniors Year Of Allotment Of Such Officer Fixation Of Interpretation Of Statutes I A S Regulation Of Seniority First Amendment Rules, 1989 Rule 3 3 Ii Proviso Construction Whether Prospective In Operation Legislative Intention What Is Constitution Of India 1950 Articles 14 16 And Rule 3 3 Ii Proviso Of I A S Regulation Of Seniority First Amendment Rules 1989 Constitutional Validity Of Whether Inconsistent With Section 3 La Of The All India Services Act, 1957 All India Services Act, 1951 Section 3 1 A Rules Made Under Rule 3 3 Ii, Proviso Of The First Amendment Rules, 1989 Consultation Object, Importance And Nature Of Failure To Consult All Stares And Union Territories Whether Proviso To Rule 3 3 Unconstitutional Headnote On 19 1 1984, The Association Petitioner No 1 In W P C No 499 Of 1991 Requested The Union Government Respondent To Remove The Disparity Prevailing In Different States Of Promotional Avenues From State Civil Services To All India Administrative Service A Committee Of Senior Secretaries, Constituted By The Union Government, Recommended An Equitable Principle Of Comparable Seniority From Different States For Promotion To The Indian Administrative Service The I A S Regulation Of Seniority Rules, 1987 Came Into Force With Effect From 6 11 1987, Repealing The Old Rules In A Circular Dated 9 9 1986 Issued By The Respondent Union Government Directed The State Governments To Give Weightage Over And Above Four Years The Assignment Of Year Of Allotment As Per The Existing Rules, Namely, Four Years For The First 12 Years State Service With Additional Weightage One Year For Every Two To The Years Completed Service Subject To A Maximum Of Five Years Union Government Amended And Published The New Seniority Rules, 1987, After Considering The Suggestions From The State Governments The First Amendment Rules Was Published In The Gazette Of India On 32 1989 Which Was Give

11 November, 1992·PETITIONER:UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.Vs. RESPONDENT:SYED MOHD. RAZA KAZMI AND ORS. DATE OF JUDGMENT13/03/1992 BENCH: RANGNATHAN, S. BENCH: RANGNATHAN, S.RAMASWAMI, V. (J) II YOGESHWAR DAYAL (J) CITATION:<table cellspacing="0" style="border-collapse:collapse;margin-left:8.5pt"><tbody><tr style="height:1...

Judges: M Venkatachaliah, S Agrawal, A Anand

11 November, 1992·1. SLP (C) No. 12077/92: The petitioner seeks special leave to appeal to this Court from the order dated 7.4.1992 made by the High Court of Delhi in C.R.No. 2032/1992 and connected cases disposing of a batch of writ petitions. This special leave petition is confined to the order insofar as it relate...

Judges: S Agrawal, A Anand

11 November, 1992·ORDER Mr. S.C. Agrawal, J.1. This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment of the High Court of Karnataka dated December 17, 1981 in Writ Petition No. 4091 of 1980 filed by the respondent wherein he challenged the validity of the order dated February 9, 1990 terminating his services....