Supreme Court Decisions/Judgements Directory

Judges: A M Ahmadi, M M Punchhi And K Ramaswamy, Jj Act Indian Administrative Service Regulation Of Seniority First Amendment Rules 1989 Rule 3 3 Ii Seniority Of Promotees Direct Recruits Assigning Year Of Allotment Procedure Legislative Intention What Is Junior Officer Promoted On Merit Superseding Seniors Year Of Allotment Of Such Officer Fixation Of Interpretation Of Statutes I A S Regulation Of Seniority First Amendment Rules, 1989 Rule 3 3 Ii Proviso Construction Whether Prospective In Operation Legislative Intention What Is Constitution Of India 1950 Articles 14 16 And Rule 3 3 Ii Proviso Of I A S Regulation Of Seniority First Amendment Rules 1989 Constitutional Validity Of Whether Inconsistent With Section 3 La Of The All India Services Act, 1957 All India Services Act, 1951 Section 3 1 A Rules Made Under Rule 3 3 Ii, Proviso Of The First Amendment Rules, 1989 Consultation Object, Importance And Nature Of Failure To Consult All Stares And Union Territories Whether Proviso To Rule 3 3 Unconstitutional Headnote On 19 1 1984, The Association Petitioner No 1 In W P C No 499 Of 1991 Requested The Union Government Respondent To Remove The Disparity Prevailing In Different States Of Promotional Avenues From State Civil Services To All India Administrative Service A Committee Of Senior Secretaries, Constituted By The Union Government, Recommended An Equitable Principle Of Comparable Seniority From Different States For Promotion To The Indian Administrative Service The I A S Regulation Of Seniority Rules, 1987 Came Into Force With Effect From 6 11 1987, Repealing The Old Rules In A Circular Dated 9 9 1986 Issued By The Respondent Union Government Directed The State Governments To Give Weightage Over And Above Four Years The Assignment Of Year Of Allotment As Per The Existing Rules, Namely, Four Years For The First 12 Years State Service With Additional Weightage One Year For Every Two To The Years Completed Service Subject To A Maximum Of Five Years Union Government Amended And Published The New Seniority Rules, 1987, After Considering The Suggestions From The State Governments The First Amendment Rules Was Published In The Gazette Of India On 32 1989 Which Was Give

11 November, 1992·PETITIONER:GENERAL MANAGER, E.I.D. PARRY (INDIA) LTD.Vs. RESPONDENT:PRESIDING OFFICER, 2ND ADDL. LABOUR COURTMADRAS AND ORS. DATE OF JUDGMENT02/05/1991 BENCH:MISRA, RANGNATH (CJ) BENCH:MISRA, RANGNATH (CJ) AHMADI, A.M. (J) SAHAI, R.M. (J) CITATION:1991 AIR 1544 1991 SCR (2) 637 1991 SCC Supl. (1...

Judges: A M Ahmadi, M M Punchhi And K Ramaswamy, Jj Act Indian Administrative Service Regulation Of Seniority First Amendment Rules 1989 Rule 3 3 Ii Seniority Of Promotees Direct Recruits Assigning Year Of Allotment Procedure Legislative Intention What Is Junior Officer Promoted On Merit Superseding Seniors Year Of Allotment Of Such Officer Fixation Of Interpretation Of Statutes I A S Regulation Of Seniority First Amendment Rules, 1989 Rule 3 3 Ii Proviso Construction Whether Prospective In Operation Legislative Intention What Is Constitution Of India 1950 Articles 14 16 And Rule 3 3 Ii Proviso Of I A S Regulation Of Seniority First Amendment Rules 1989 Constitutional Validity Of Whether Inconsistent With Section 3 La Of The All India Services Act, 1957 All India Services Act, 1951 Section 3 1 A Rules Made Under Rule 3 3 Ii, Proviso Of The First Amendment Rules, 1989 Consultation Object, Importance And Nature Of Failure To Consult All Stares And Union Territories Whether Proviso To Rule 3 3 Unconstitutional Headnote On 19 1 1984, The Association Petitioner No 1 In W P C No 499 Of 1991 Requested The Union Government Respondent To Remove The Disparity Prevailing In Different States Of Promotional Avenues From State Civil Services To All India Administrative Service A Committee Of Senior Secretaries, Constituted By The Union Government, Recommended An Equitable Principle Of Comparable Seniority From Different States For Promotion To The Indian Administrative Service The I A S Regulation Of Seniority Rules, 1987 Came Into Force With Effect From 6 11 1987, Repealing The Old Rules In A Circular Dated 9 9 1986 Issued By The Respondent Union Government Directed The State Governments To Give Weightage Over And Above Four Years The Assignment Of Year Of Allotment As Per The Existing Rules, Namely, Four Years For The First 12 Years State Service With Additional Weightage One Year For Every Two To The Years Completed Service Subject To A Maximum Of Five Years Union Government Amended And Published The New Seniority Rules, 1987, After Considering The Suggestions From The State Governments The First Amendment Rules Was Published In The Gazette Of India On 32 1989 Which Was Give

11 November, 1992·PETITIONER:S.L. CHOPRA AND ORS. ETC. ETC.Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ETC. ETC. DATE OF JUDGMENT05/04/1991 BENCH:RAMASWAMY, K. BENCH:RAMASWAMY, K. SINGH, K.N. (J) CITATION:1991 AIR 1126 1991 SCR (2) 221 1992 SCC Supl. (1) 391 JT 1991 (2) 203 1991 SCALE (1)612 ACT:Haryana Service of ...

Judges: A M Ahmadi, M M Punchhi And K Ramaswamy, Jj Act Indian Administrative Service Regulation Of Seniority First Amendment Rules 1989 Rule 3 3 Ii Seniority Of Promotees Direct Recruits Assigning Year Of Allotment Procedure Legislative Intention What Is Junior Officer Promoted On Merit Superseding Seniors Year Of Allotment Of Such Officer Fixation Of Interpretation Of Statutes I A S Regulation Of Seniority First Amendment Rules, 1989 Rule 3 3 Ii Proviso Construction Whether Prospective In Operation Legislative Intention What Is Constitution Of India 1950 Articles 14 16 And Rule 3 3 Ii Proviso Of I A S Regulation Of Seniority First Amendment Rules 1989 Constitutional Validity Of Whether Inconsistent With Section 3 La Of The All India Services Act, 1957 All India Services Act, 1951 Section 3 1 A Rules Made Under Rule 3 3 Ii, Proviso Of The First Amendment Rules, 1989 Consultation Object, Importance And Nature Of Failure To Consult All Stares And Union Territories Whether Proviso To Rule 3 3 Unconstitutional Headnote On 19 1 1984, The Association Petitioner No 1 In W P C No 499 Of 1991 Requested The Union Government Respondent To Remove The Disparity Prevailing In Different States Of Promotional Avenues From State Civil Services To All India Administrative Service A Committee Of Senior Secretaries, Constituted By The Union Government, Recommended An Equitable Principle Of Comparable Seniority From Different States For Promotion To The Indian Administrative Service The I A S Regulation Of Seniority Rules, 1987 Came Into Force With Effect From 6 11 1987, Repealing The Old Rules In A Circular Dated 9 9 1986 Issued By The Respondent Union Government Directed The State Governments To Give Weightage Over And Above Four Years The Assignment Of Year Of Allotment As Per The Existing Rules, Namely, Four Years For The First 12 Years State Service With Additional Weightage One Year For Every Two To The Years Completed Service Subject To A Maximum Of Five Years Union Government Amended And Published The New Seniority Rules, 1987, After Considering The Suggestions From The State Governments The First Amendment Rules Was Published In The Gazette Of India On 32 1989 Which Was Give

11 November, 1992·PETITIONER:BHATINDA IMPROVEMENT TRUST Vs. RESPONDENT:BALWANT SINGH AND OTHERS DATE OF JUDGMENT11/09/1991 BENCH:KANIA, M.H. BENCH:KANIA, M.H. SAWANT, P.B.CITATION:JT 1991 (6) 135 1991 SCALE (2)561 ACT:Interpretation of Statutes--Reference of Sections 6, 28, 58, 59 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 in...

Judges: A M Ahmadi, M M Punchhi And K Ramaswamy, Jj Act Indian Administrative Service Regulation Of Seniority First Amendment Rules 1989 Rule 3 3 Ii Seniority Of Promotees Direct Recruits Assigning Year Of Allotment Procedure Legislative Intention What Is Junior Officer Promoted On Merit Superseding Seniors Year Of Allotment Of Such Officer Fixation Of Interpretation Of Statutes I A S Regulation Of Seniority First Amendment Rules, 1989 Rule 3 3 Ii Proviso Construction Whether Prospective In Operation Legislative Intention What Is Constitution Of India 1950 Articles 14 16 And Rule 3 3 Ii Proviso Of I A S Regulation Of Seniority First Amendment Rules 1989 Constitutional Validity Of Whether Inconsistent With Section 3 La Of The All India Services Act, 1957 All India Services Act, 1951 Section 3 1 A Rules Made Under Rule 3 3 Ii, Proviso Of The First Amendment Rules, 1989 Consultation Object, Importance And Nature Of Failure To Consult All Stares And Union Territories Whether Proviso To Rule 3 3 Unconstitutional Headnote On 19 1 1984, The Association Petitioner No 1 In W P C No 499 Of 1991 Requested The Union Government Respondent To Remove The Disparity Prevailing In Different States Of Promotional Avenues From State Civil Services To All India Administrative Service A Committee Of Senior Secretaries, Constituted By The Union Government, Recommended An Equitable Principle Of Comparable Seniority From Different States For Promotion To The Indian Administrative Service The I A S Regulation Of Seniority Rules, 1987 Came Into Force With Effect From 6 11 1987, Repealing The Old Rules In A Circular Dated 9 9 1986 Issued By The Respondent Union Government Directed The State Governments To Give Weightage Over And Above Four Years The Assignment Of Year Of Allotment As Per The Existing Rules, Namely, Four Years For The First 12 Years State Service With Additional Weightage One Year For Every Two To The Years Completed Service Subject To A Maximum Of Five Years Union Government Amended And Published The New Seniority Rules, 1987, After Considering The Suggestions From The State Governments The First Amendment Rules Was Published In The Gazette Of India On 32 1989 Which Was Give

11 November, 1992·PETITIONER:PATEL NARANBHAI MARGHABHAI AND ORS.Vs. RESPONDENT:DECEASED DHULABHAI GALBABHAI AND ORS. DATE OF JUDGMENT15/05/1992 BENCH:RAMASWAMY, K. BENCH:RAMASWAMY, K. KASLIWAL, N.M. (J) CITATION:1992 AIR 2009 1992 SCR (3) 384 1992 SCC (4) 264 JT 1992 (4) 381 1992 SCALE (1)1304 ACT:Bombay Agri...

Judges: A M Ahmadi, M M Punchhi And K Ramaswamy, Jj Act Indian Administrative Service Regulation Of Seniority First Amendment Rules 1989 Rule 3 3 Ii Seniority Of Promotees Direct Recruits Assigning Year Of Allotment Procedure Legislative Intention What Is Junior Officer Promoted On Merit Superseding Seniors Year Of Allotment Of Such Officer Fixation Of Interpretation Of Statutes I A S Regulation Of Seniority First Amendment Rules, 1989 Rule 3 3 Ii Proviso Construction Whether Prospective In Operation Legislative Intention What Is Constitution Of India 1950 Articles 14 16 And Rule 3 3 Ii Proviso Of I A S Regulation Of Seniority First Amendment Rules 1989 Constitutional Validity Of Whether Inconsistent With Section 3 La Of The All India Services Act, 1957 All India Services Act, 1951 Section 3 1 A Rules Made Under Rule 3 3 Ii, Proviso Of The First Amendment Rules, 1989 Consultation Object, Importance And Nature Of Failure To Consult All Stares And Union Territories Whether Proviso To Rule 3 3 Unconstitutional Headnote On 19 1 1984, The Association Petitioner No 1 In W P C No 499 Of 1991 Requested The Union Government Respondent To Remove The Disparity Prevailing In Different States Of Promotional Avenues From State Civil Services To All India Administrative Service A Committee Of Senior Secretaries, Constituted By The Union Government, Recommended An Equitable Principle Of Comparable Seniority From Different States For Promotion To The Indian Administrative Service The I A S Regulation Of Seniority Rules, 1987 Came Into Force With Effect From 6 11 1987, Repealing The Old Rules In A Circular Dated 9 9 1986 Issued By The Respondent Union Government Directed The State Governments To Give Weightage Over And Above Four Years The Assignment Of Year Of Allotment As Per The Existing Rules, Namely, Four Years For The First 12 Years State Service With Additional Weightage One Year For Every Two To The Years Completed Service Subject To A Maximum Of Five Years Union Government Amended And Published The New Seniority Rules, 1987, After Considering The Suggestions From The State Governments The First Amendment Rules Was Published In The Gazette Of India On 32 1989 Which Was Give

11 November, 1992·PETITIONER:BHIKHA RAM Vs. RESPONDENT:RAM SARUP AND ORS.DATE OF JUDGMENT31/10/1991 BENCH:AHMADI, A.M. (J) BENCH:AHMADI, A.M. (J) MISRA, RANGNATH (CJ) SAWANT, P.B.CITATION:1992 AIR 207 1991 SCR Supl. (2) 119 1992 SCC (1) 319 JT 1991 (4) 199 1991 SCALE (2)909 ACT:Punjab pre-emption Act, 191...

Judges: A M Ahmadi, M M Punchhi And K Ramaswamy, Jj Act Indian Administrative Service Regulation Of Seniority First Amendment Rules 1989 Rule 3 3 Ii Seniority Of Promotees Direct Recruits Assigning Year Of Allotment Procedure Legislative Intention What Is Junior Officer Promoted On Merit Superseding Seniors Year Of Allotment Of Such Officer Fixation Of Interpretation Of Statutes I A S Regulation Of Seniority First Amendment Rules, 1989 Rule 3 3 Ii Proviso Construction Whether Prospective In Operation Legislative Intention What Is Constitution Of India 1950 Articles 14 16 And Rule 3 3 Ii Proviso Of I A S Regulation Of Seniority First Amendment Rules 1989 Constitutional Validity Of Whether Inconsistent With Section 3 La Of The All India Services Act, 1957 All India Services Act, 1951 Section 3 1 A Rules Made Under Rule 3 3 Ii, Proviso Of The First Amendment Rules, 1989 Consultation Object, Importance And Nature Of Failure To Consult All Stares And Union Territories Whether Proviso To Rule 3 3 Unconstitutional Headnote On 19 1 1984, The Association Petitioner No 1 In W P C No 499 Of 1991 Requested The Union Government Respondent To Remove The Disparity Prevailing In Different States Of Promotional Avenues From State Civil Services To All India Administrative Service A Committee Of Senior Secretaries, Constituted By The Union Government, Recommended An Equitable Principle Of Comparable Seniority From Different States For Promotion To The Indian Administrative Service The I A S Regulation Of Seniority Rules, 1987 Came Into Force With Effect From 6 11 1987, Repealing The Old Rules In A Circular Dated 9 9 1986 Issued By The Respondent Union Government Directed The State Governments To Give Weightage Over And Above Four Years The Assignment Of Year Of Allotment As Per The Existing Rules, Namely, Four Years For The First 12 Years State Service With Additional Weightage One Year For Every Two To The Years Completed Service Subject To A Maximum Of Five Years Union Government Amended And Published The New Seniority Rules, 1987, After Considering The Suggestions From The State Governments The First Amendment Rules Was Published In The Gazette Of India On 32 1989 Which Was Give

11 November, 1992·PETITIONER:STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ORS.Vs. RESPONDENT:A.K. RAJORIYA AND ANR. DATE OF JUDGMENT28/04/1992 BENCH: SAWANT, P.B. BENCH: SAWANT, P.B.<table cellspacing="0" style="border-collapse:collapse"><tbody><tr style="height:12pt"><td style="width:150pt"><p class="s1" style="padding-left: 2pt;tex...

Judges: A M Ahmadi, M M Punchhi And K Ramaswamy, Jj Act Indian Administrative Service Regulation Of Seniority First Amendment Rules 1989 Rule 3 3 Ii Seniority Of Promotees Direct Recruits Assigning Year Of Allotment Procedure Legislative Intention What Is Junior Officer Promoted On Merit Superseding Seniors Year Of Allotment Of Such Officer Fixation Of Interpretation Of Statutes I A S Regulation Of Seniority First Amendment Rules, 1989 Rule 3 3 Ii Proviso Construction Whether Prospective In Operation Legislative Intention What Is Constitution Of India 1950 Articles 14 16 And Rule 3 3 Ii Proviso Of I A S Regulation Of Seniority First Amendment Rules 1989 Constitutional Validity Of Whether Inconsistent With Section 3 La Of The All India Services Act, 1957 All India Services Act, 1951 Section 3 1 A Rules Made Under Rule 3 3 Ii, Proviso Of The First Amendment Rules, 1989 Consultation Object, Importance And Nature Of Failure To Consult All Stares And Union Territories Whether Proviso To Rule 3 3 Unconstitutional Headnote On 19 1 1984, The Association Petitioner No 1 In W P C No 499 Of 1991 Requested The Union Government Respondent To Remove The Disparity Prevailing In Different States Of Promotional Avenues From State Civil Services To All India Administrative Service A Committee Of Senior Secretaries, Constituted By The Union Government, Recommended An Equitable Principle Of Comparable Seniority From Different States For Promotion To The Indian Administrative Service The I A S Regulation Of Seniority Rules, 1987 Came Into Force With Effect From 6 11 1987, Repealing The Old Rules In A Circular Dated 9 9 1986 Issued By The Respondent Union Government Directed The State Governments To Give Weightage Over And Above Four Years The Assignment Of Year Of Allotment As Per The Existing Rules, Namely, Four Years For The First 12 Years State Service With Additional Weightage One Year For Every Two To The Years Completed Service Subject To A Maximum Of Five Years Union Government Amended And Published The New Seniority Rules, 1987, After Considering The Suggestions From The State Governments The First Amendment Rules Was Published In The Gazette Of India On 32 1989 Which Was Give

11 November, 1992·PETITIONER:STATE BANK OF INDIA Vs. RESPONDENT:INDEXPORT REGISTERED AND ORS. DATE OF JUDGMENT30/04/1992 BENCH:YOGESHWAR DAYAL (J) BENCH:YOGESHWAR DAYAL (J) RANGNATHAN, S. RAMASWAMI, V. (J) II CITATION:1992 AIR 1740 1992 SCR (2)1031 1992 SCC (3) 159 JT 1992 (4) 273 1992 SCALE (1)1109 ACT:Civil...

Judges: A M Ahmadi, M M Punchhi And K Ramaswamy, Jj Act Indian Administrative Service Regulation Of Seniority First Amendment Rules 1989 Rule 3 3 Ii Seniority Of Promotees Direct Recruits Assigning Year Of Allotment Procedure Legislative Intention What Is Junior Officer Promoted On Merit Superseding Seniors Year Of Allotment Of Such Officer Fixation Of Interpretation Of Statutes I A S Regulation Of Seniority First Amendment Rules, 1989 Rule 3 3 Ii Proviso Construction Whether Prospective In Operation Legislative Intention What Is Constitution Of India 1950 Articles 14 16 And Rule 3 3 Ii Proviso Of I A S Regulation Of Seniority First Amendment Rules 1989 Constitutional Validity Of Whether Inconsistent With Section 3 La Of The All India Services Act, 1957 All India Services Act, 1951 Section 3 1 A Rules Made Under Rule 3 3 Ii, Proviso Of The First Amendment Rules, 1989 Consultation Object, Importance And Nature Of Failure To Consult All Stares And Union Territories Whether Proviso To Rule 3 3 Unconstitutional Headnote On 19 1 1984, The Association Petitioner No 1 In W P C No 499 Of 1991 Requested The Union Government Respondent To Remove The Disparity Prevailing In Different States Of Promotional Avenues From State Civil Services To All India Administrative Service A Committee Of Senior Secretaries, Constituted By The Union Government, Recommended An Equitable Principle Of Comparable Seniority From Different States For Promotion To The Indian Administrative Service The I A S Regulation Of Seniority Rules, 1987 Came Into Force With Effect From 6 11 1987, Repealing The Old Rules In A Circular Dated 9 9 1986 Issued By The Respondent Union Government Directed The State Governments To Give Weightage Over And Above Four Years The Assignment Of Year Of Allotment As Per The Existing Rules, Namely, Four Years For The First 12 Years State Service With Additional Weightage One Year For Every Two To The Years Completed Service Subject To A Maximum Of Five Years Union Government Amended And Published The New Seniority Rules, 1987, After Considering The Suggestions From The State Governments The First Amendment Rules Was Published In The Gazette Of India On 32 1989 Which Was Give

11 November, 1992·PETITIONER:MOHD. FIDA KARIM AND ANR.Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. DATE OF JUDGMENT31/03/1992 BENCH:KASLIWAL, N.M. (J) BENCH:KASLIWAL, N.M. (J) REDDY, K. JAYACHANDRA (J) RAY, G.N. (J) CITATION:1992 AIR 1191 1992 SCR (2) 408 1992 SCC (2) 631 JT 1992 (2) 520 1992 SCALE (1)768 ACT:Bihar...

Judges: A M Ahmadi, M M Punchhi And K Ramaswamy, Jj Act Indian Administrative Service Regulation Of Seniority First Amendment Rules 1989 Rule 3 3 Ii Seniority Of Promotees Direct Recruits Assigning Year Of Allotment Procedure Legislative Intention What Is Junior Officer Promoted On Merit Superseding Seniors Year Of Allotment Of Such Officer Fixation Of Interpretation Of Statutes I A S Regulation Of Seniority First Amendment Rules, 1989 Rule 3 3 Ii Proviso Construction Whether Prospective In Operation Legislative Intention What Is Constitution Of India 1950 Articles 14 16 And Rule 3 3 Ii Proviso Of I A S Regulation Of Seniority First Amendment Rules 1989 Constitutional Validity Of Whether Inconsistent With Section 3 La Of The All India Services Act, 1957 All India Services Act, 1951 Section 3 1 A Rules Made Under Rule 3 3 Ii, Proviso Of The First Amendment Rules, 1989 Consultation Object, Importance And Nature Of Failure To Consult All Stares And Union Territories Whether Proviso To Rule 3 3 Unconstitutional Headnote On 19 1 1984, The Association Petitioner No 1 In W P C No 499 Of 1991 Requested The Union Government Respondent To Remove The Disparity Prevailing In Different States Of Promotional Avenues From State Civil Services To All India Administrative Service A Committee Of Senior Secretaries, Constituted By The Union Government, Recommended An Equitable Principle Of Comparable Seniority From Different States For Promotion To The Indian Administrative Service The I A S Regulation Of Seniority Rules, 1987 Came Into Force With Effect From 6 11 1987, Repealing The Old Rules In A Circular Dated 9 9 1986 Issued By The Respondent Union Government Directed The State Governments To Give Weightage Over And Above Four Years The Assignment Of Year Of Allotment As Per The Existing Rules, Namely, Four Years For The First 12 Years State Service With Additional Weightage One Year For Every Two To The Years Completed Service Subject To A Maximum Of Five Years Union Government Amended And Published The New Seniority Rules, 1987, After Considering The Suggestions From The State Governments The First Amendment Rules Was Published In The Gazette Of India On 32 1989 Which Was Give

11 November, 1992·PETITIONER:Y. SRINIVASA RAO Vs. RESPONDENT:J. VEERAIAH AND ORS.DATE OF JUDGMENT27/04/1992 BENCH:SHARMA, L.M. (J) BENCH:SHARMA, L.M. (J) ANAND, A.S. (J) CITATION:1993 AIR 929 1992 SCR (2) 780 1992 SCC (3) 63 JT 1992 (3) 84 1992 SCALE (1)935 ACT:Constitution of India, 1950:Article 14-Settleme...

Judges: A M Ahmadi, M M Punchhi And K Ramaswamy, Jj Act Indian Administrative Service Regulation Of Seniority First Amendment Rules 1989 Rule 3 3 Ii Seniority Of Promotees Direct Recruits Assigning Year Of Allotment Procedure Legislative Intention What Is Junior Officer Promoted On Merit Superseding Seniors Year Of Allotment Of Such Officer Fixation Of Interpretation Of Statutes I A S Regulation Of Seniority First Amendment Rules, 1989 Rule 3 3 Ii Proviso Construction Whether Prospective In Operation Legislative Intention What Is Constitution Of India 1950 Articles 14 16 And Rule 3 3 Ii Proviso Of I A S Regulation Of Seniority First Amendment Rules 1989 Constitutional Validity Of Whether Inconsistent With Section 3 La Of The All India Services Act, 1957 All India Services Act, 1951 Section 3 1 A Rules Made Under Rule 3 3 Ii, Proviso Of The First Amendment Rules, 1989 Consultation Object, Importance And Nature Of Failure To Consult All Stares And Union Territories Whether Proviso To Rule 3 3 Unconstitutional Headnote On 19 1 1984, The Association Petitioner No 1 In W P C No 499 Of 1991 Requested The Union Government Respondent To Remove The Disparity Prevailing In Different States Of Promotional Avenues From State Civil Services To All India Administrative Service A Committee Of Senior Secretaries, Constituted By The Union Government, Recommended An Equitable Principle Of Comparable Seniority From Different States For Promotion To The Indian Administrative Service The I A S Regulation Of Seniority Rules, 1987 Came Into Force With Effect From 6 11 1987, Repealing The Old Rules In A Circular Dated 9 9 1986 Issued By The Respondent Union Government Directed The State Governments To Give Weightage Over And Above Four Years The Assignment Of Year Of Allotment As Per The Existing Rules, Namely, Four Years For The First 12 Years State Service With Additional Weightage One Year For Every Two To The Years Completed Service Subject To A Maximum Of Five Years Union Government Amended And Published The New Seniority Rules, 1987, After Considering The Suggestions From The State Governments The First Amendment Rules Was Published In The Gazette Of India On 32 1989 Which Was Give

11 November, 1992·PETITIONER:BASANAGOUDA Vs. RESPONDENT:DR. S. B. AMARKHED AND ORS. DATE OF JUDGMENT31/03/1992 BENCH:RAMASWAMY, K. BENCH:RAMASWAMY, K. KULDIP SINGH (J) CITATION:1992 AIR 1163 1992 SCR (2) 397 1992 SCC (2) 612 JT 1992 (2) 484 1992 SCALE (1)770 ACT:Election:Representation of the People Act, 1951...