Supreme Court Decisions/Judgements Directory

Judges: Act Criminal Procedure Code 1973 Sections 468 473 Limitation Applicability Of Matrimonial Offences Like Cruelty, The Non Obstante Clause Of Section 473 And Its Over Riding Effect Explained Criminal Procedure Code 1973 Section 482 Quashing Of Pro Ceedings Before Magistrate By The High Court No Cognizance Of Offence Section 498 A I P C After Expiry Of Three Years Validity Of Maxim Vigilantibus It Non Dormientibus, Jura Subveniunt Applicability Of In Cases Of Matrimonial Offences Like Cruelty Basic Difference Between The Limitation Under Section 473 And Section 5 Of The Limitation Act Explained Headnote A Complaint Petition Was Filed Before The Magistrate By The Appellant That She Was Ill Treated And Subjected To Cruelty By Husband The Accused Respondent And Her In Laws, And That During The Subsistence Of Their Marriage He Married Again And Got A Second, Wife The High Court On An Application Filed By The Accused Respondent Under Section 482 Of Cr P C Quashed The Criminal Proceedings, Holding That It Was Time Barred Since After Three Years Cognizance Cannot Be Taken Of An Offence Under Section 498 A Of The Penal Code, 2188 In View Of The Section 468 Of The Criminal Procedure Code Allowing The Appeal, The Court, To Take Cognizance Even Of He Offence Under Section 498 A Of The Penal Code Ignoring The Bar Of Section 468 Of The Cr P C 295 C 2 In View Of The Allegation Of Second Marriage During

20 April, 1990·PETITIONER:DR. P.N. PURI & ORS.Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF U.P. & ORS.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 29/01/1996 BENCH:RAMASWAMY, K. BENCH:RAMASWAMY, K.G.B. PATTANAIK (J) CITATION:JT 1996 (2) 472 1996 SCALE (2)210 ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:O R D E R The petitioner filed a writ petition in the High Court for directi...

Judges: Act Criminal Procedure Code 1973 Sections 468 473 Limitation Applicability Of Matrimonial Offences Like Cruelty, The Non Obstante Clause Of Section 473 And Its Over Riding Effect Explained Criminal Procedure Code 1973 Section 482 Quashing Of Pro Ceedings Before Magistrate By The High Court No Cognizance Of Offence Section 498 A I P C After Expiry Of Three Years Validity Of Maxim Vigilantibus It Non Dormientibus, Jura Subveniunt Applicability Of In Cases Of Matrimonial Offences Like Cruelty Basic Difference Between The Limitation Under Section 473 And Section 5 Of The Limitation Act Explained Headnote A Complaint Petition Was Filed Before The Magistrate By The Appellant That She Was Ill Treated And Subjected To Cruelty By Husband The Accused Respondent And Her In Laws, And That During The Subsistence Of Their Marriage He Married Again And Got A Second, Wife The High Court On An Application Filed By The Accused Respondent Under Section 482 Of Cr P C Quashed The Criminal Proceedings, Holding That It Was Time Barred Since After Three Years Cognizance Cannot Be Taken Of An Offence Under Section 498 A Of The Penal Code, 2188 In View Of The Section 468 Of The Criminal Procedure Code Allowing The Appeal, The Court, To Take Cognizance Even Of He Offence Under Section 498 A Of The Penal Code Ignoring The Bar Of Section 468 Of The Cr P C 295 C 2 In View Of The Allegation Of Second Marriage During

20 April, 1990·PETITIONER:SATISH KUMAR Vs. RESPONDENT:THE JALANDHAR IMPROVEMENTTRUST, JALANDHAR & ANR. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 29/01/1996 BENCH:RAMASWAMY, K. BENCH:RAMASWAMY, K.G.B. PATTANAIK (J) CITATION:1996 SCC (7) 277 1996 SCALE (2)13 ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:O R D E R Though the learned counsel has tried his best...

Judges: Act Criminal Procedure Code 1973 Sections 468 473 Limitation Applicability Of Matrimonial Offences Like Cruelty, The Non Obstante Clause Of Section 473 And Its Over Riding Effect Explained Criminal Procedure Code 1973 Section 482 Quashing Of Pro Ceedings Before Magistrate By The High Court No Cognizance Of Offence Section 498 A I P C After Expiry Of Three Years Validity Of Maxim Vigilantibus It Non Dormientibus, Jura Subveniunt Applicability Of In Cases Of Matrimonial Offences Like Cruelty Basic Difference Between The Limitation Under Section 473 And Section 5 Of The Limitation Act Explained Headnote A Complaint Petition Was Filed Before The Magistrate By The Appellant That She Was Ill Treated And Subjected To Cruelty By Husband The Accused Respondent And Her In Laws, And That During The Subsistence Of Their Marriage He Married Again And Got A Second, Wife The High Court On An Application Filed By The Accused Respondent Under Section 482 Of Cr P C Quashed The Criminal Proceedings, Holding That It Was Time Barred Since After Three Years Cognizance Cannot Be Taken Of An Offence Under Section 498 A Of The Penal Code, 2188 In View Of The Section 468 Of The Criminal Procedure Code Allowing The Appeal, The Court, To Take Cognizance Even Of He Offence Under Section 498 A Of The Penal Code Ignoring The Bar Of Section 468 Of The Cr P C 295 C 2 In View Of The Allegation Of Second Marriage During

20 April, 1990·PETITIONER:STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR.Vs. RESPONDENT:POOJA BREW-CHEM INDUSTRIES P. LTD. & ANR. DATE OF JUDGMENT15/09/1995 BENCH:RAMASWAMY, K. BENCH:RAMASWAMY, K. HANSARIA B.L. (J) CITATION:1996 AIR 219 1995 SCC Supl. (4) 179 JT 1995 (7) 39 1995 SCALE (5)537 ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:Leave grant...

Judges: Act Criminal Procedure Code 1973 Sections 468 473 Limitation Applicability Of Matrimonial Offences Like Cruelty, The Non Obstante Clause Of Section 473 And Its Over Riding Effect Explained Criminal Procedure Code 1973 Section 482 Quashing Of Pro Ceedings Before Magistrate By The High Court No Cognizance Of Offence Section 498 A I P C After Expiry Of Three Years Validity Of Maxim Vigilantibus It Non Dormientibus, Jura Subveniunt Applicability Of In Cases Of Matrimonial Offences Like Cruelty Basic Difference Between The Limitation Under Section 473 And Section 5 Of The Limitation Act Explained Headnote A Complaint Petition Was Filed Before The Magistrate By The Appellant That She Was Ill Treated And Subjected To Cruelty By Husband The Accused Respondent And Her In Laws, And That During The Subsistence Of Their Marriage He Married Again And Got A Second, Wife The High Court On An Application Filed By The Accused Respondent Under Section 482 Of Cr P C Quashed The Criminal Proceedings, Holding That It Was Time Barred Since After Three Years Cognizance Cannot Be Taken Of An Offence Under Section 498 A Of The Penal Code, 2188 In View Of The Section 468 Of The Criminal Procedure Code Allowing The Appeal, The Court, To Take Cognizance Even Of He Offence Under Section 498 A Of The Penal Code Ignoring The Bar Of Section 468 Of The Cr P C 295 C 2 In View Of The Allegation Of Second Marriage During

20 April, 1990·PETITIONER:V. KRISHNA MUDALIAR Vs. RESPONDENT:LAKSHMI AMMAL DATE OF JUDGMENT18/09/1995 BENCH:KULDIP SINGH (J) BENCH:KULDIP SINGH (J) AHMAD SAGHIR S. (J) CITATION:1996 AIR 129 1995 SCC (5) 689 1995 SCALE (5)398 ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:O R D E R This is tenant’s appeal. Respondent-landlord filed ev...

Judges: Act Criminal Procedure Code 1973 Sections 468 473 Limitation Applicability Of Matrimonial Offences Like Cruelty, The Non Obstante Clause Of Section 473 And Its Over Riding Effect Explained Criminal Procedure Code 1973 Section 482 Quashing Of Pro Ceedings Before Magistrate By The High Court No Cognizance Of Offence Section 498 A I P C After Expiry Of Three Years Validity Of Maxim Vigilantibus It Non Dormientibus, Jura Subveniunt Applicability Of In Cases Of Matrimonial Offences Like Cruelty Basic Difference Between The Limitation Under Section 473 And Section 5 Of The Limitation Act Explained Headnote A Complaint Petition Was Filed Before The Magistrate By The Appellant That She Was Ill Treated And Subjected To Cruelty By Husband The Accused Respondent And Her In Laws, And That During The Subsistence Of Their Marriage He Married Again And Got A Second, Wife The High Court On An Application Filed By The Accused Respondent Under Section 482 Of Cr P C Quashed The Criminal Proceedings, Holding That It Was Time Barred Since After Three Years Cognizance Cannot Be Taken Of An Offence Under Section 498 A Of The Penal Code, 2188 In View Of The Section 468 Of The Criminal Procedure Code Allowing The Appeal, The Court, To Take Cognizance Even Of He Offence Under Section 498 A Of The Penal Code Ignoring The Bar Of Section 468 Of The Cr P C 295 C 2 In View Of The Allegation Of Second Marriage During

20 April, 1990·PETITIONER:V.M. MATHEW Vs. RESPONDENT:V.S. SHARMA AND OTHERS DATE OF JUDGMENT29/08/1995 BENCH:RAMASWAMY, K. BENCH:RAMASWAMY, K. HANSARIA B.L. (J) CITATION:1996 AIR 109 1995 SCC (6) 122 JT 1995 (6) 318 1995 SCALE (5)111 ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:K. RAMASWAMY, J.Special leave granted.J U D G M E ...

Judges: Act Criminal Procedure Code 1973 Sections 468 473 Limitation Applicability Of Matrimonial Offences Like Cruelty, The Non Obstante Clause Of Section 473 And Its Over Riding Effect Explained Criminal Procedure Code 1973 Section 482 Quashing Of Pro Ceedings Before Magistrate By The High Court No Cognizance Of Offence Section 498 A I P C After Expiry Of Three Years Validity Of Maxim Vigilantibus It Non Dormientibus, Jura Subveniunt Applicability Of In Cases Of Matrimonial Offences Like Cruelty Basic Difference Between The Limitation Under Section 473 And Section 5 Of The Limitation Act Explained Headnote A Complaint Petition Was Filed Before The Magistrate By The Appellant That She Was Ill Treated And Subjected To Cruelty By Husband The Accused Respondent And Her In Laws, And That During The Subsistence Of Their Marriage He Married Again And Got A Second, Wife The High Court On An Application Filed By The Accused Respondent Under Section 482 Of Cr P C Quashed The Criminal Proceedings, Holding That It Was Time Barred Since After Three Years Cognizance Cannot Be Taken Of An Offence Under Section 498 A Of The Penal Code, 2188 In View Of The Section 468 Of The Criminal Procedure Code Allowing The Appeal, The Court, To Take Cognizance Even Of He Offence Under Section 498 A Of The Penal Code Ignoring The Bar Of Section 468 Of The Cr P C 295 C 2 In View Of The Allegation Of Second Marriage During

20 April, 1990·PETITIONER:INDIAN CEMENT AND ORS.Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ORS. DATE OF JUDGMENT12/01/1988 BENCH:MISRA RANGNATH BENCH:MISRA RANGNATH DUTT, M.M. (J) CITATION:1988 AIR 567 1988 SCR (2) 574 1988 SCC (1) 743 JT 1988 (1) 84 1988 SCALE (1)43 CITATOR INFO :R 1988 SC1814 (6) R ...

Judges: Act Criminal Procedure Code 1973 Sections 468 473 Limitation Applicability Of Matrimonial Offences Like Cruelty, The Non Obstante Clause Of Section 473 And Its Over Riding Effect Explained Criminal Procedure Code 1973 Section 482 Quashing Of Pro Ceedings Before Magistrate By The High Court No Cognizance Of Offence Section 498 A I P C After Expiry Of Three Years Validity Of Maxim Vigilantibus It Non Dormientibus, Jura Subveniunt Applicability Of In Cases Of Matrimonial Offences Like Cruelty Basic Difference Between The Limitation Under Section 473 And Section 5 Of The Limitation Act Explained Headnote A Complaint Petition Was Filed Before The Magistrate By The Appellant That She Was Ill Treated And Subjected To Cruelty By Husband The Accused Respondent And Her In Laws, And That During The Subsistence Of Their Marriage He Married Again And Got A Second, Wife The High Court On An Application Filed By The Accused Respondent Under Section 482 Of Cr P C Quashed The Criminal Proceedings, Holding That It Was Time Barred Since After Three Years Cognizance Cannot Be Taken Of An Offence Under Section 498 A Of The Penal Code, 2188 In View Of The Section 468 Of The Criminal Procedure Code Allowing The Appeal, The Court, To Take Cognizance Even Of He Offence Under Section 498 A Of The Penal Code Ignoring The Bar Of Section 468 Of The Cr P C 295 C 2 In View Of The Allegation Of Second Marriage During

20 April, 1990·PETITIONER:K.I. SHEPHARD & ORS. ETC. ETC.Vs. RESPONDENT:UNION OF INDIA & ORS.DATE OF JUDGMENT18/09/1987 BENCH:MISRA RANGNATH BENCH:MISRA RANGNATH DUTT, M.M. (J) CITATION:1988 AIR 686 1988 SCR (1) 188 1987 SCC (4) 431 JT 1987 (3) 600 1987 SCALE (2)599 CITATOR INFO :F 1989 SC 568 (12) RF ...

Judges: Act Criminal Procedure Code 1973 Sections 468 473 Limitation Applicability Of Matrimonial Offences Like Cruelty, The Non Obstante Clause Of Section 473 And Its Over Riding Effect Explained Criminal Procedure Code 1973 Section 482 Quashing Of Pro Ceedings Before Magistrate By The High Court No Cognizance Of Offence Section 498 A I P C After Expiry Of Three Years Validity Of Maxim Vigilantibus It Non Dormientibus, Jura Subveniunt Applicability Of In Cases Of Matrimonial Offences Like Cruelty Basic Difference Between The Limitation Under Section 473 And Section 5 Of The Limitation Act Explained Headnote A Complaint Petition Was Filed Before The Magistrate By The Appellant That She Was Ill Treated And Subjected To Cruelty By Husband The Accused Respondent And Her In Laws, And That During The Subsistence Of Their Marriage He Married Again And Got A Second, Wife The High Court On An Application Filed By The Accused Respondent Under Section 482 Of Cr P C Quashed The Criminal Proceedings, Holding That It Was Time Barred Since After Three Years Cognizance Cannot Be Taken Of An Offence Under Section 498 A Of The Penal Code, 2188 In View Of The Section 468 Of The Criminal Procedure Code Allowing The Appeal, The Court, To Take Cognizance Even Of He Offence Under Section 498 A Of The Penal Code Ignoring The Bar Of Section 468 Of The Cr P C 295 C 2 In View Of The Allegation Of Second Marriage During

20 April, 1990·PETITIONER:COMMISSIONER, SALES TAX, U.P.Vs. RESPONDENT:AGRA BELTING WORKS, AGRA DATE OF JUDGMENT29/04/1987 BENCH:MISRA RANGNATH BENCH:MISRA RANGNATH PATHAK, R.S. (CJ) RAY, B.C. (J) CITATION:1987 SCR (3) 93 1987 SCC (3) 140 JT 1987 (2) 514 1987 SCALE (1)1061 ACT:U.P. Sales Tax Act, 1948--Secti...

Judges: Act Criminal Procedure Code 1973 Sections 468 473 Limitation Applicability Of Matrimonial Offences Like Cruelty, The Non Obstante Clause Of Section 473 And Its Over Riding Effect Explained Criminal Procedure Code 1973 Section 482 Quashing Of Pro Ceedings Before Magistrate By The High Court No Cognizance Of Offence Section 498 A I P C After Expiry Of Three Years Validity Of Maxim Vigilantibus It Non Dormientibus, Jura Subveniunt Applicability Of In Cases Of Matrimonial Offences Like Cruelty Basic Difference Between The Limitation Under Section 473 And Section 5 Of The Limitation Act Explained Headnote A Complaint Petition Was Filed Before The Magistrate By The Appellant That She Was Ill Treated And Subjected To Cruelty By Husband The Accused Respondent And Her In Laws, And That During The Subsistence Of Their Marriage He Married Again And Got A Second, Wife The High Court On An Application Filed By The Accused Respondent Under Section 482 Of Cr P C Quashed The Criminal Proceedings, Holding That It Was Time Barred Since After Three Years Cognizance Cannot Be Taken Of An Offence Under Section 498 A Of The Penal Code, 2188 In View Of The Section 468 Of The Criminal Procedure Code Allowing The Appeal, The Court, To Take Cognizance Even Of He Offence Under Section 498 A Of The Penal Code Ignoring The Bar Of Section 468 Of The Cr P C 295 C 2 In View Of The Allegation Of Second Marriage During

20 April, 1990·PETITIONER:FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA Vs. RESPONDENT:SURENDRA, DEVENDRA & MOHENDRA TRANSPORT CO. DATE OF JUDGMENT10/12/1987 BENCH:MUKHARJI, SABYASACHI (J) BENCH:MUKHARJI, SABYASACHI (J) RANGNATHAN, S.CITATION:1988 AIR 734 1988 SCR (2) 327 1988 SCC (1) 547 JT 1988 (1) 57 1988 SCALE (1)21 CITA...

Judges: Act Criminal Procedure Code 1973 Sections 468 473 Limitation Applicability Of Matrimonial Offences Like Cruelty, The Non Obstante Clause Of Section 473 And Its Over Riding Effect Explained Criminal Procedure Code 1973 Section 482 Quashing Of Pro Ceedings Before Magistrate By The High Court No Cognizance Of Offence Section 498 A I P C After Expiry Of Three Years Validity Of Maxim Vigilantibus It Non Dormientibus, Jura Subveniunt Applicability Of In Cases Of Matrimonial Offences Like Cruelty Basic Difference Between The Limitation Under Section 473 And Section 5 Of The Limitation Act Explained Headnote A Complaint Petition Was Filed Before The Magistrate By The Appellant That She Was Ill Treated And Subjected To Cruelty By Husband The Accused Respondent And Her In Laws, And That During The Subsistence Of Their Marriage He Married Again And Got A Second, Wife The High Court On An Application Filed By The Accused Respondent Under Section 482 Of Cr P C Quashed The Criminal Proceedings, Holding That It Was Time Barred Since After Three Years Cognizance Cannot Be Taken Of An Offence Under Section 498 A Of The Penal Code, 2188 In View Of The Section 468 Of The Criminal Procedure Code Allowing The Appeal, The Court, To Take Cognizance Even Of He Offence Under Section 498 A Of The Penal Code Ignoring The Bar Of Section 468 Of The Cr P C 295 C 2 In View Of The Allegation Of Second Marriage During

20 April, 1990·PETITIONER:U.P. INCOME-TAX DEPARTMENT CONTINGENT PAID STATEWELFARE ASSO Vs. RESPONDENT:UNION OF INDIA & ORS.DATE OF JUDGMENT04/12/1987 BENCH:VENKATARAMIAH, E.S. (J) BENCH:VENKATARAMIAH, E.S. (J) SINGH, K.N. (J) CITATION:1988 AIR 517 1988 SCR (2) 170 1987 SCC Supl. 658 JT 1987 (4) 585 1987 SC...