Supreme Court Decisions/Judgements Directory

Judges: Act Criminal Procedure Code 1973 Sections 468 473 Limitation Applicability Of Matrimonial Offences Like Cruelty, The Non Obstante Clause Of Section 473 And Its Over Riding Effect Explained Criminal Procedure Code 1973 Section 482 Quashing Of Pro Ceedings Before Magistrate By The High Court No Cognizance Of Offence Section 498 A I P C After Expiry Of Three Years Validity Of Maxim Vigilantibus It Non Dormientibus, Jura Subveniunt Applicability Of In Cases Of Matrimonial Offences Like Cruelty Basic Difference Between The Limitation Under Section 473 And Section 5 Of The Limitation Act Explained Headnote A Complaint Petition Was Filed Before The Magistrate By The Appellant That She Was Ill Treated And Subjected To Cruelty By Husband The Accused Respondent And Her In Laws, And That During The Subsistence Of Their Marriage He Married Again And Got A Second, Wife The High Court On An Application Filed By The Accused Respondent Under Section 482 Of Cr P C Quashed The Criminal Proceedings, Holding That It Was Time Barred Since After Three Years Cognizance Cannot Be Taken Of An Offence Under Section 498 A Of The Penal Code, 2188 In View Of The Section 468 Of The Criminal Procedure Code Allowing The Appeal, The Court, To Take Cognizance Even Of He Offence Under Section 498 A Of The Penal Code Ignoring The Bar Of Section 468 Of The Cr P C 295 C 2 In View Of The Allegation Of Second Marriage During

20 April, 1990·PETITIONER:V. PARUKUTTY MANNADISSIAR & ANR.Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF KERALA & ORS. DATE OF JUDGMENT05/09/1989 BENCH:MISRA RANGNATH BENCH:MISRA RANGNATH VENKATACHALLIAH, M.N. (J) CITATION:1990 AIR 817 1989 SCR Supl. (1) 37 1990 SCC Supl. 245 JT 1989 (3) 572 1989 SCALE (2)529 ACT:Kerala Private ...

Judges: Pandian, S R J

19 April, 1990·CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 1924 of 1990.From the Judgment and Order dated 6.8.1986 of the Kerala High Court in E.S.A. No. 15 of 1979.K.K. Venugopa|, M.K. Sasidharan and P.K. Pillai for the Appellants.T.S. Krishnamoorthy Iyer, P.S. Poti, S. Balakrishnan, Deepak Nargoalkar, E.M.S. ...

Judges: Sharma, L M J

19 April, 1990·CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 870 of 1975.From the Judgment and Order dated 24.1.1975 of the Bombay High Court in Special Civil Application No. 963 of 1973.V.V. Vaze, V.N. Patil and A.S. Bhasme for the Appellant. V.M. Tarkunde, V.N. Ganpule, Ms. Punam Kumari, Suman B. Rastogi, Ms. J...

Judges: Kasliwal, N M J

19 April, 1990·CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal Nos. 1894, 1895 & 1896 of 1990.From the Judgment and Order dated 9.2.1989 of the Punjab & Haryana High Court in Civil W.P. Nos. 1778, 1776 & 1777 of 1989.Balbir Singh Wasu, N.S. Das Bahl for the Appellant. Har Dev Singh and Ms. Madhu Moolchandani for the Re...

Judges: R Misra, K Singh

17 April, 1990·1. This matter had been sent to the Lok Adalat held in this Court on 31st March, 1990 but the parties did not come to any settlement. Therefore, the matter has been heard today.2. We have looked into the records and have considered submissions advanced before us. The Presiding Officer, Labour Court ...

Judges: Reddy, K Jayachandra J

17 April, 1990·CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Criminal Appeal No. 27 1 of 1990.From the Judgment and Order dated 16.1.1989 of the Delhi High Court in Criminal Writ No. 34 of 1989.K.V. Vishwanathan and S.R. Setia for the Appellant. T.T. Kunhikanna, Udai Lalit and P. Parmeshwaran for the Respondents.The Judgment o...

Judges: Kasliwal, N M J

17 April, 1990·CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 673 of 1986.From the Judgment & Order dated 17.2.1986 of the Madhya Pradesh High Court in Election Petition No. 41 of 1985. S.S. Khanduja, Y.P. Dhingra and B .K. Satija for the Appel- lant.Mrs. J. Wad for the Respondent.The Judgment of the Court was del...

Judges: S Pandian, K J Reddy

17 April, 1990·ORDER K. Jayachandra Reddy, J.1. This appeal on special leave being granted by this Court is directed against the judgment of Punjab & Haryana High Court acquitting the accused, the respondents herein.2. The accused were tried for offences punishable under Sections 302/34, 120B and 506 I.P.C. The le...

Judges: Rangnathan, S

16 April, 1990·ORIGINAL JURISDICTION: Writ Petition (Civil) Nos. 507 and 1260 of 1989.(Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India).M.K. Ramamurthy, Rajinder Sachhar, Dr. Francis Julion, Ms. Aruna Mathur, A. Mariarputham, Ms. S. Dikshit, S. Va- sudevan and Pradeep Misra for the Petitioners. For the Respondents--...

Judges: K J Shetty, M F Beevi

12 April, 1990·ORDER K. Jagannatha Shetty, J.1. The Staff Artists of Doordarshan are again before this Court. This Writ Petition under Article 32 of the Constitution has been filed by the Union representing the members of the staff working in the Camera Section of the Doordarshan Kendra. The Camera Section is said...