Gutham Singh vs State Of Punjab And Anr.
Judges: R Misra, N Ojha
11 May, 1988·JUDGMENT R. Misra and N.D. Ojha, JJ.1. Special leave granted.2. The appellant was Nazir in the court of Sub-Divisional Officer, Nabha.3. He was prosecuted for criminal misappropriation punishable under Section 409 of I.P.C. on the allegation that he had failed to account for a sum of Rs. 4,941.47 en...
Supreme Court Of India
Coffee Board, Karnataka, ... vs Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes
Judges: Mukharji, Sabyasachi J
11 May, 1988·CIVIL APPELLATE/ORIGINAL JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal Nos. 4522-4529 of 1985 etc. etc From the Judgment and order dated 16.8.1985 of the Karnataka High Court in W P. Nos t5536-40/1982 and W P. Nos. 13981, 17071, . 17072. 19118 and 19285/ 1983.G. Ramaswami. Additional Solicitor General, R J Babu, R.F N...
Supreme Court Of India
Bharat Petroleum (Erstwhile ... vs Bharat Petroleum Corporation ...
Judges: Misra Rangnath
11 May, 1988·ORIGINAL JURISDICTION: Writ Petition (Civil) No. 590 of (Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India) B.B. Sawhney for the Petitioners.G.B. Pai, O.C. Mathur, Ms. Meera Mathur, Ms. Deepa Chhabra and N. Misra for the Respondents.The Judgment of the Court was delivered by RANGANATH MISRA, J. Under th...
Supreme Court Of India
Registrar. High Court Of Madras ... vs R. Rajiah And K. Rajeswaran
Judges: Dutt, M M J
11 May, 1988·CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 367 & 368 of 1984 From the Judgment and order dated 17.5.1983 of the Madras High Court in W.P. No. 5008 of 1980 and 5304 of 1982 Rajendra Choudhary for the Appellant.G.N. Rao and T. Sridharan for the respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered ...
Supreme Court Of India
D.K. Agarwal vs High Court Of Judicature At ...
Judges: Dutt, M M J
11 May, 1988·CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 1875 of 1988.From the Judgment and order dated l0.12.1987 of the Allahabad High Court in Civil Misc. Writ No. 4434 of 1987.S N. Kacker, Gobind Dass, E.C. Agarwala, Ms. Purnima Bhatt and V.K. Pandita for the Appellant.K. Parasaran, Attorney General (Not ...
Supreme Court Of India
Jagan Nath (Deceased) Through ... vs Chander Bhan And Others
Judges: Mukharji, Sabyasachi J
11 May, 1988·CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 1127 of 1985.From the Judgment and order dated 29.8.84 of the Delhi High Court in S.A.O. No. 40 of 1984.Rajinder Sachhar and Mrs. Rani Chhabra for the Appellants.A.K. Ganguli and E.M.S. Anam for the Respondents. The Judgement of the Court was delivered ...
Supreme Court Of India
State Cf Madhya Pradesh and Ors vs Ashok Deshmukh and Anr
Judges: Venkataramiah, E S J
11 May, 1988·CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 2756 of 1987.From the Judgment and Order dated 2.9.1986 of the Madhya Pradesh High Court in C.M.P. No. 742 of 1985.S.N. Khare and T.C. Sharma for the Appellants. S.K. Gambhir for the Respondents.The Judgment of the Court was delivered by VENKATARAMIAH, ...
Supreme Court Of India
Mehmood Alam Tariq And Ors. Etc vs State Of Rajasthan and Ors. Etc
Judges: Venkatachalliah, M N J
11 May, 1988·CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 741 of 1987.From the Judgment and order dated 6.2.1987 of the Rajasthan High Court in D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1632, 1758, 1826, 340, 1723, 344, 342, 343, 1755, 1756, 1757, 1982 of 1986, 170/87 and S.A. No. 341 of 1986 V.M. Tarkunde, Mrs. M. Karanja...
Supreme Court Of India
Rajendrakumar Natvarlal Shah vs State Of Gujarat and Ors
Judges: Sen, A P J
10 May, 1988·Delhi Administration, Crl. W. No. 43/84 dated 16.4.1984 and Cases taking the same view did not lay down good law and were overruled. In this case, the appellant was arrested on 2nd February, 1987. The order of detention of the appellant was passed on 28th May, 1987. Though there was no explanation f...
Supreme Court Of India
Dipti Narayan Srimani vs Controller Of Estate Duty, West ...
Judges: Venkatachalliah, M N J
09 May, 1988·The reservation "interest", so as to attract Section 12(1), must be in the property as such and that mere collateral benefits reserved by the settlor emanating from some other property or some other source, inde-pendent of the property so settled, will not attract the section. The distinction betwee...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.