A.R. Antulay vs R.S. Nayak and Anr
Judges: Mukharji, Sabyasachi J, Misra Rangnath, Oza, G L J, Ray, B C J Venkatachalliah, M N J, Venkatachalliah, M N J Rangnathan, S
29 April, 1988·Prem Chand Garg v. Excise Commissioner, U.P., Allahabad 1963 1 SCR 885 referred to.25. Apart from the fact that the petition of review had to be filed within 30 days-and here there has been inordinate delay-the petition for review had to be placed before the same Bench and now that two of the learne...
Supreme Court Of India
Weston Electroniks and Anr vs State Of Gujarat and Anr
Judges: Pathak, R S Cj
29 April, 1988·CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION: Writ Petition No. 1032 of 1986.(Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India). Soli J. Sorabjee, Ms. S. Ralhan, S.C. Dhande and Ms. Rekha Pandey for the petitioners.V.S. Desai, A.S. Bhasme and Khanwilkar for the respondents.The Judgment of the Court was delivered by PAT...
Supreme Court Of India
Mridula Avasthi and Ors. Etc vs University Of Delhi and Ors
Judges: Misra Rangnath
27 April, 1988·CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION: Writ Petition (Civil) NO. 194 of 1988. etc etc. 764 (Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India). D.D. Thakur, T.S. Krishnamurthi Iyer, Rajesh Mitra, Ms. Santosh Kalra, H.K. Puri, R.L. Roshan, S.S. Sabharwal, S.K. Sabharwal, and M.K.D. Namboodiri for the Petitioners.P...
Supreme Court Of India
Post Graduate Institute And Ors. vs Dr. J.B. Dilawari And Ors.
Judges: M Dutt, R Misra
26 April, 1988·1. The Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, abbreviated as PGI (hereafter referred to as 'the Institute') at Chandigarh is an institution of national importance created under a parliamentary legislation by that name under the Central Act 51 of 1966. It is a body corporate and i...
Supreme Court Of India
Laxmi Raj Shetty And Anr vs State Of Tamil Nadu
Judges: Sen, A P J
26 April, 1988·CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Criminal Appeal No. 36 of 1987.From the Judgment and Order dated 1.9.1986 of the High Court of Madras in Crl. Appeal No. 893 of 1985.N. Natarajan, V. Krishnamurthi and V. Balachandran for the Appellants.U.R. Lalit, A.V. Rangam, V.R. Venkataswami and L. Rajendran for ...
Supreme Court Of India
P.M. Nalini vs K.M. Mathew
Judges: A Sen, L Sharma
26 April, 1988·1. Leave granted. Arguments heard.2. We fail to appreciate the legality and propriety of the order passed by the learned Single Judge invoking the inherent powers of the High Court under Section 482 of the CrPC, 1973 with a view to quash the complaint filed by the appellant against the respondent K....
Supreme Court Of India
Surajmal vs Radheyshyam
Judges: A Sen, L Sharma
26 April, 1988·JUDGMENT Lalit Mohan Sharma, J.1. The present appeal arises out of a suit filed by the respondent Radheyshyam for eviction of the original appellant Surajmal from the demised premises comprised of a shop described in the plaint. The premises was in possession of Surajmal in the capacity of a tenant ...
Supreme Court Of India
Smt. Sudha Devi vs M.P. Narayanan and Ors
Judges: Sharma, L M J
26 April, 1988·CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal Nos. 4145-46 of 1986.From the Judgment and order dated 10.7.85 and 11.11.85 of the High Court of Calcutta in Appeal No. 477 of 1984.Tapas Ray and B.R. Agarwal for the Appellant.V.A. Bobde, Rajiv Dutta and Ms. Mridula Ray for the Respondents.The Judgment of ...
Supreme Court Of India
Anil Kumar Neotia And Ors vs Union Of India and Ors
Judges: Mukharji, Sabyasachi J
26 April, 1988·ORIGINAL JURISDICTION: Writ Petition (Civil) No. 305 of 1988.(Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India). Soli J. Sorabjee, Harish, N. Salve, Vasant Mehta, Atul Tewari and Miss Bina Gupta for the Petitioners.Satish Chandra, Anil B. Divan, Dr. Y.S. Chitale, P.V. Kapur, Anil Kumar Sharma, P.P. Mal...
Supreme Court Of India
Thacker Hariram Motiram vs Balkrishan Chatrabhu Thacker And ...
Judges: S Ranganathan, S Mukharji
25 April, 1988·ORDER Sabyasachi Mukharji, J.1. Interim order staying dispossession was granted by this Court on 24.1.1986. It appears that before the learned Judge of the High Court the learned advocate who appeared for the petitioner, requested that in view of the fact that the decree for actual possession was be...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.