Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Supreme Court Of India
  4. /
  5. 2011
  6. /
  7. January

Ram Sawrup vs State Of Haryana & Anr

Supreme Court Of India|05 August, 2011
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Summary

Issue: Compromise entered into after the order had already been made by the High Court
Rule: Section 320 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC)
Application: The High Court declined to accept the compromise entered into between the parties after the order had already been made.
Conclusion: The refusal to accept the compromise has resulted in the continuation of the proceedings against the appellant, despite the fact that the amount due to the complainant has been received by him.
1. Leave granted.
2. The respondent-complainant has been served but has not put in appearance.
3. The learned counsel for the appellant has drawn our attention to Annexures P6 and P7 to contend that the amount due to the complainant had been received by him and that he would have no objection if the complaint was dismissed. The High Court has, however, by the impugned order, declined to accept the compromise in the light of the fact that it had been entered into after the order had already been made by the High Court. Be that as it may, as of today nothing is due to the complainant from the appellant.
4. We, accordingly, feel that the ends of justice would be met if the proceedings against the appellant are quashed, the High Court order is set aside, and the appellant is acquitted.
5. The appeal stands disposed of in the above terms.
. J [HARJIT SINGH BEDI] . J [GYAN SUDHA MISRA] NEW DELHI AUGUST 05, 2011.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ram Sawrup vs State Of Haryana & Anr

Court

Supreme Court Of India

JudgmentDate
05 August, 2011
Judges
  • Harjit Singh Bedi
  • Gyan Sudha Misra