Leave granted.
We have read and considered the order of the High Court impugned in the present appeals.
We have heard learned counsels for the parties.
On due consideration, we find that the High Court in coming to the impugned conclusions and in directing for eviction of the appellants/removal of alleged encroachments, had arrived at conclusions not supported by the documents on record. Merely because the report of the Advocate-Commissioners appointed by the Court had indicated that the appellants had raised unauthorised construction, the High Court could not have come to the Signature Not Verifiedimpugned conclusions and issued directions as stated Digitally signed by DEEPAK GUGLANI Date: 2019.08.29 above. We are equally surprised that the Municipal 16:39:09 IST Reason:
Corporation, which now support the order of the High Court, did not take any action in the matter and did not exericse its power under the Statutes.
SLP(C) 2685-2686/2015 etc. 2 In the above circumstances, we allow the appeals set aside the order of the High Court and grant liberty to the Municipal Corporation to proceed in accordance with law, if so advised.
....................CJI [Ranjan Gogoi] .....................J. [Deepak Gupta] .....................J. [Aniruddha Bose] New Delhi;
July 19, 2019.
SLP(C) 2685-2686/2015 etc. 3 ITEM NO.60 COURT NO.1 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Nos. 2685-2686/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 15-01-2015 in CLMA Nos. 11205/2014 and 11206/2014 and CWP No. 31/2012 passed by the High Court Of Uttarakhand At Nainital) PRADEEP SINGH BISHT & ANR. Petitioners VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY & ORS. Respondents (IA No. 3/2015 - INTERVENTION APPLICATION) WITH SLP(C) Nos. 2733-2734/2015 (X) SLP(C) Nos. 2751-2752/2015 (X) (APP FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS ON IA 3/2015) Date : 19-07-2019 This matter was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE For Petitioner Ms. Ruchira Gupta, Adv. Ms. Mona Sinha, Adv.
Mr. Shishir Deshpande, AOR Ms. Shashi Kiran, AOR Dr. Satish Chandra, Adv. Mr. Arjun Sain, Adv.
Mr. Manoj Jain, Adv.
Mr. Prabhoo Dayal Tiwari, Adv.
Ms. Surbhi Mehta, AOR For Respondent Mr. Bahar U. Barqui, Adv.
Mr. Aftab Ali Khan, AOR Mr. M.Z. Chaudhary, Adv.
Mr. Arvind Kumar Kanva, Adv. Mr. Syed Mohammed Aatif, Adv. Mr. Ali Safeer Farooqi, Adv. SLP(C) 2685-2686/2015 etc. 4 Mr. Syed Imtiaz Ali, Adv.
Mr. Gopal Jha, Adv.
Mr. M. Rambabu, Adv.
Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR Mr. Manish Kumar, Adv.
Ms. Divya Roy, AOR Mr. Abhishek Atrey, AOR Mr. Jatinder Kumar Bhatia, AOR Mr. Tanmaya Agarwal, Adv.
Mr. Rahul Kaushik, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Leave granted.
The appeals are allowed in terms of the signed order.
Pending interlocutory applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.
(Deepak Guglani) (Anand Prakash) Court Master Court Master (signed order is placed on the file)