Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Supreme Court Of India
  4. /
  5. 1995
  6. /
  7. January

Kuldeep Singh vs Ganpat Lal & Anr

Supreme Court Of India|05 December, 1995
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Summary

Issue: Whether the appellant (M/S. National Aluminium Co. Ltd.) can be impleaded as a party in the pending proceedings in the court of Subordinate Judge, Angul
Rule: The judgment of this Court in U.P. Avas Vikas Evam Parishad v. Gyan Devi [Dead] by Lrs. & Ors. [JT 1994 (7) SC 304]
Application: The appellant is entitled to be impleaded as a party in the pending proceedings based on the principle established in U.P. Avas Vikas Evam Parishad v. Gyan Devi [Dead] by Lrs. & Ors. [JT 1994 (7) SC 304]
Conclusion: The appellant (M/S. National Aluminium Co. Ltd.) is entitled to be impleaded as a party in the pending proceedings in the court of Subordinate Judge, Angul
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 1 PETITIONER:
M/S. NATIONAL ALUMINIUM CO. LTD.
Vs. RESPONDENT:
RAJ KISHORE @ SAHU JENA & ANR. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/01/1996 BENCH:
RAMASWAMY, K. BENCH:
RAMASWAMY, K.
G.B. PATTANAIK (J) CITATION:
1996 SCC (3) 44 JT 1996 (1) 617 1996 SCALE (1)SP34 ACT:
HEADNOTE:
JUDGMENT:
Leave granted.
O R D E R Though notice was served on the respondents, no one has appeared for the first respondent-claimant. The controversy is no longer res integra. They are covered by the judgment of this Court in U.P. Avas Vikas Evam Parishad v. Gyan Devi [Dead] by Lrs. & Ors. [JT 1994 (7) SC 304]. In that view, the appellant being beneficiary is entitled to be impleaded as a party in the pending proceedings in the court of Subordinate Judge, Angul.
The appeal is accordingly allowed. No costs.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Kuldeep Singh vs Ganpat Lal & Anr

Court

Supreme Court Of India

JudgmentDate
05 December, 1995
Judges
  • Kuldip Singh
  • S Saghir Ahmad Act Headnote