http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 1 CASE NO.:
Appeal (civil) 3193 of 2008 PETITIONER:
M/S. NEW KRISHNA TENT STORE RESPONDENT:
BHAJAN KAUR DATE OF JUDGMENT: 29/04/2008 BENCH:
TARUN CHATTERJEE & HARJIT SINGH BEDI JUDGMENT:
JUDGMENT O R D E R CIVIL APPEAL NO.3193 OF 2008 (Arising out of SLP(C)No.4876 of 2007) ers Leave granted.
This is an appeal at the instance of the tenant-appellant against the concurrent ord passed on an application for eviction which was filed on the ground that the respondent-land lady required the suit premises for her bona fide use to start business in the same. The High Co urt as well as the courts below held that in fact, the respondent required the suit premises for he r use to start business in the same. Nothing could be shown by the learned senior counsel appearing for the appellant to satisfy us for the purpose of setting aside such concurrent findings of fac t.
Accordingly, there is no merit in this appeal. The appeal is thus dismissed.
However, the appellant is granted nine months’ time i.e. till 31st of January, 2009 to vacate the premises in question subject to filing a usual undertaking in this Court within four wee ks from this date.