ITEM NO.103 COURT NO.8 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7986 OF 2002 GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Appellant (s) VERSUS RISHI LAL CHAWLA Respondent(s) WITH Civil Appeal NO. 7983-7984 of 2002 (With office report) Date: 30/04/2009 This Appeal was called on for hearing today. CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA For Appellant(s) Mr. Devesh Kumar, Adv.for Ms. Reena Singh, Adv.(NP) Mr. Rakesh Uttamchandra Upadhyay,Adv.(NP) Mr. Sudhir Kulshreshtha, Adv. (NP) For Respondent(s) Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta,Adv.(NP) Rr-Ex-Parte UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The appeals are dismissed for non-prosecution.
[ Usha Bhardwaj ] [ Vijay Dhawan] Court Master Court Master Signed order is placed on the file.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.7986 OF 2002 Ghaziabad Development Authority ...Appellant(s) Versus Rishi Lal Chawla ...Respondent(s) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NOS.7983-7984 OF 2002 Ghaziabad Development Authority ...Appellant(s) Versus Kanti Prasad Rajvanshi Respondent(s) O R D E R The matters were called out for hearing yesterday when a request for adjournment was made by the counsel appearing for Ms. Reena Singh, Advocate on the ground that she was in personal difficulty. The request for adjournment was declined but the matter was passed over to enable the counsel to inform Ms. Singh about our order. Somehow the matters could not be taken up yesterday and have now been called out for hearing. Again the same counsel makes prayer for adjournment. We have declined the prayer. We have requested the counsel to argue, but he has expressed his ..2/-
:2:
inability to do so. Under the circumstances we have no option but to dismiss the appeals for non-prosecution.
Ordered accordingly.
New Delhi, APRIL 30, 2009.
. J.
(D.K. JAIN) . J.
(R.M. LODHA)