Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Supreme Court Of India
  4. /
  5. 2016
  6. /
  7. January

Delhi Development Authority vs Veena Mahajan And Ors

Supreme Court Of India|16 August, 2016
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

1 NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 8147 OF 2016 [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 18200 OF 2015] DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Appellant(s) VERSUS VEENA MAHAJAN AND ORS. Respondent(s) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO. 8148 OF 2016 [@SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 32641 OF 2015] CIVIL APPEAL NO. 8149 OF 2016 [@SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 7011 OF 2016] CIVIL APPEAL NO. 8150 OF 2016 [@SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 7014 OF 2016] CIVIL APPEAL NO. 8151 OF 2016 [@SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 9899 OF 2016] CIVIL APPEAL NO. 8152 OF 2016 [@SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 10189 OF 2016] CIVIL APPEAL NO. 8153 OF 2016 [@SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 9898 OF 2016] J U D G M E N T KURIAN, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. It is not in dispute that in all these appeals, the awards are passed five years prior to 01.01.2014, the date of coming into force of The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 is dated Page 1 2 01.01.2014 and that there was no stay operating in any of the cases of the respondents and yet, possession has not been taken. Therefore, Section 24(2) of the Act has to apply and the acquisitions are to be declared as lapsed.
3. In that view of the matter, the appeals are dismissed.
No costs.
. J.
[ KURIAN JOSEPH ] . J.
[ SHIVA KIRTI SINGH] New Delhi; August 16, 2016.
Page 2
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Delhi Development Authority vs Veena Mahajan And Ors

Court

Supreme Court Of India

JudgmentDate
16 August, 2016
Judges
  • Kurian Joseph
  • Shiva Kirti Singh